Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 25, 2020, 02:02:43 am
News: 2020 U.S. Senate Predictions are now active.

  Atlas Forum
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderators: The Chad Pygmy Marmosets, Apocrypha)
  Kennedy/Smathers vs. Rockefeller/Reagan vs. Wallace/LeMay-1968
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Kennedy/Smathers vs. Rockefeller/Reagan vs. Wallace/LeMay-1968  (Read 4784 times)
HappyWarrior
hannibal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,059


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: April 20, 2008, 09:16:59 pm »

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Why would he do that to the son of his running mate?



Mitt Romney is Ronald Reagan's son?

Whoops, thought it said Romney, well none the less, why would Rockefeller whup Mitt Romney?

You may want to consider registering for a remedial reading course.

The subject is Kennedy/Smathers vs. Rockefeller/Reagan.

The only arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts who ever ran for President in the history of the U.S. was one spoiled brat Robert F. Kennedy, given a plum cabinet job by big brother John F. Kennedy.

Mitt Romney didn't need a big brother handing him a plum political appointment on a silver platter, as Robert Kennedy evidently did. 



Edit

But yes, I do see your humor here.

Good job.

Actually I was sort of rooting for Mitt Romney in the primary.  If he had'nt been such a flip-flopper I might have supported him if he had stuck to who he was in Mass. considering he and Ted Kennedy brought universal health care to the state.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14,024


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: April 23, 2008, 08:31:22 pm »

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Rockefeller/Reagan                 353
Kennedy/Smathers                 119
Wallace/LeMay                          66



Winfield, back when I was young and naive, I used to believe you created good maps. This now proves that you don't, atleast in my mind. You are misunderestimating the power of a Kennedy, especially Bobby Kennedy. I highly doubt that he would do worse than what Old Hube did in RL (but that's another scenario and this is a different one). Please explain.

You still are.
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,133
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: April 24, 2008, 02:57:18 am »

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Rockefeller/Reagan                 353
Kennedy/Smathers                 119
Wallace/LeMay                          66



Winfield, back when I was young and naive, I used to believe you created good maps. This now proves that you don't, atleast in my mind. You are misunderestimating the power of a Kennedy, especially Bobby Kennedy. I highly doubt that he would do worse than what Old Hube did in RL (but that's another scenario and this is a different one). Please explain.

You still are.

How so? I admit I am young, considering I'm 15 now but I have gained a fair bit of experience on this forum.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14,024


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: April 24, 2008, 10:47:49 pm »

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Rockefeller/Reagan                 353
Kennedy/Smathers                 119
Wallace/LeMay                          66



Winfield, back when I was young and naive, I used to believe you created good maps. This now proves that you don't, atleast in my mind. You are misunderestimating the power of a Kennedy, especially Bobby Kennedy. I highly doubt that he would do worse than what Old Hube did in RL (but that's another scenario and this is a different one). Please explain.

You still are.

How so? I admit I am young, considering I'm 15 now but I have gained a fair bit of experience on this forum.

Let me alter my reply slightly. 

You still are.  Smiley
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,133
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: April 25, 2008, 05:04:32 am »

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Rockefeller/Reagan                 353
Kennedy/Smathers                 119
Wallace/LeMay                          66



Winfield, back when I was young and naive, I used to believe you created good maps. This now proves that you don't, atleast in my mind. You are misunderestimating the power of a Kennedy, especially Bobby Kennedy. I highly doubt that he would do worse than what Old Hube did in RL (but that's another scenario and this is a different one). Please explain.

You still are.

How so? I admit I am young, considering I'm 15 now but I have gained a fair bit of experience on this forum.

Let me alter my reply slightly. 

You still are.  Smiley

No Winfield, let me alter my reply. If I'm young and naive, you must be a Republican hack Wink.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14,024


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: April 25, 2008, 09:07:30 pm »

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Rockefeller/Reagan                 353
Kennedy/Smathers                 119
Wallace/LeMay                          66



Winfield, back when I was young and naive, I used to believe you created good maps. This now proves that you don't, atleast in my mind. You are misunderestimating the power of a Kennedy, especially Bobby Kennedy. I highly doubt that he would do worse than what Old Hube did in RL (but that's another scenario and this is a different one). Please explain.

You still are.

How so? I admit I am young, considering I'm 15 now but I have gained a fair bit of experience on this forum.

Let me alter my reply slightly. 

You still are.  Smiley

No Winfield, let me alter my reply. If I'm young and naive, you must be a Republican hack Wink.

But since you insist that you are not naive, then, by definition, I must not be a Republican hack.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC