Official West Virginia Democratic Primary Discussion Thread...

[Sam Spade]

It also was the electorate with the highest proportion - just about seven in 10 - of people who lack a college degree thus far this primary season. The same held true for whites without a college degree - again, historically a strong Clinton group.

[/quote]

And still a lot of them are lying...

[Sam Spade]

Very true.  In most states, it's mostly Republicans trying to muck with the results.  In West Virginia, it's oftentimes the Democrats themselves

I didn't know that there were Republicans in West Virginia (it's a joke ok )

[Sam Spade]

CNN's exit poll reporting among Clinton supporters say that 75% would be dissatisfied if Obama won, 23% would be satisfied, and, uh...2% not "neither," but "other."  What's "other"?

"I would be neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, but I would be hungry"?

Ready for a lynching?

[Sam Spade]

The college-educated is, as usual, hilarious.

[Sam Spade]

lol, new exit revisions show Edwards gaining.

[Sam Spade]

Why would people throw away their vote on a candidate who is NOT RUNNING!!?!?!?!?!!

I really am starting to become convinced that you're a fake poster whose never lived in Oklahoma in his life.

[Sam Spade]

Randolph County @ 74% now looks normal.

[Sam Spade]

Cabell is now at 60-35 Hillary with 28%.

Logan is about where I expected it.

[Sam Spade]

I supposed half of the anti-wimmin vote would go to Obama as the "supposed nominee".  That was wrong. 

Other than that, not too bad of a prediction, really.

[Sam Spade]

I overestimated Obama's "presumptive nominee" bounce as well. But most of all underestimated Edwards.

Well, that was who the anti-wimmin vote should have supported after the "supposed nominee" thingy. (b/c they tend to be anti-black too). 

Hillary may yet fall back down to 66%, which would make my prediction of her number correct.

I know that WV-02 and WV-01 will be 4-2 Hillary.  Is WV-03 possibly 5-1?

So, it'll either be 20-8 Hillary (if 5-1) or 19-9 Hillary. (if 4-2)

[Sam Spade]

Montana and South Dakota will be interesting, actually.

[Sam Spade]

Montana and South Dakota will be interesting, actually.

Yes they will be provided they campaign there. I am guessing they will but OR could change that.

Hillary Clinton leaving after Oregon?  You're not being serious, are you?

[Sam Spade]

Montana and South Dakota will be interesting, actually.

Isn't every state "interesting" except for the ones where all you need is racial demographics and you can already draw the entire county map?

Those states are interesting too.

[Sam Spade]

Montana and South Dakota will be interesting, actually.

Isn't every state "interesting" except for the ones where all you need is racial demographics and you can already draw the entire county map?

Those states are interesting too.

So then what states aren't interesting?

Minnesota and North Dakota.

[Sam Spade]

Montana and South Dakota will be interesting, actually.

Yes they will be provided they campaign there. I am guessing they will but OR could change that.

Hillary Clinton leaving after Oregon?  You're not being serious, are you?

I was just hoping LOL. But what if she loses by 15 points? Is it onwards to lose in Montana and South Dakota? Or is she going to become puerto rican for a while?

She may lose Oregon by 15 points, but she'll probably win Kentucky by 30.

I don't know what's going to happen in Montana and South Dakota and neither do you... (especially Montana) 

Besides, if there's one thing we've learned about this campaign, it's that the right wing was wrong about many things Clinton and right about many things Clinton.  One of the things they were right on was that this woman will never quit or give in.  Ever.  Same with her husband.

[Sam Spade]

Has anyone been paying attention to what superdelegates are doing the last few days at all?

Of course, who hasn't.  Doesn't seem to affect the bitch much.