MT-Mason-Dixon: Obama defeats Clinton easily (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 03:28:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  MT-Mason-Dixon: Obama defeats Clinton easily (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MT-Mason-Dixon: Obama defeats Clinton easily  (Read 14271 times)
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

« on: May 25, 2008, 08:55:33 AM »

*yawn*

Anyone who didn't expect this is on something. Montana will be one of Obama's best states.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2008, 10:42:42 PM »

He should break 60%... makes you wonder how bad the slaughter would have been if it had been a caucus instead of a primary.

Now we just need a serious SD poll...
If it was a caucaus I would predict a margin that would almost threaten Idaho's margin. I think Obama 75% as a limit and 65% minnimum, but it is possible it would be less simply because Clinton has been campaiging more.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2008, 09:48:41 AM »

Does anyone know why the Midwest/Northwest likes Obama so much? That's been a real surprise for me in this campaign.

I mean, look at the Clinton favorability ratings in that poll.  29 - 50. Yikes.

It has to do with him being the best choice for President and her being a lying, deceptive banshee.

You can use that as a reason for any candidate winning any primary.

Seriously, why is it that the western states like Obama so much, or rather, why do they hate Hillary?
Western states tend to like Obama's message much more than Clinton. They are much more affluent on the whole and I don't think that lots of people connected at all with Clinton's recent message. Also Clinton looks like a lying, scumbag to many Democrats out east, and not to mention Bill Clinton was never really popular out west. Many western states also have lots of latte liberals as well.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.