Dems (and others on the left), do you prefer to "battle" Libertarians or Fundies (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:29:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Dems (and others on the left), do you prefer to "battle" Libertarians or Fundies (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who would you rather have as your political enemies?
#1
Fundies
 
#2
Libertarians
 
#3
Neo-Cons
 
#4
Other (explain)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 24

Author Topic: Dems (and others on the left), do you prefer to "battle" Libertarians or Fundies  (Read 7583 times)
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


« on: May 30, 2008, 06:54:21 AM »

Funnily enough none of those three ideologies have any credibility(? Perhaps the wrong word - followers maybe?) outside the United States.

Libertarianism is just a silly form of US nationalism, however it is silly enough to be attacked while maintaing some sort of credibility which the fundies don't have.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2008, 07:37:40 AM »

That's an awfully narrow definition of Libertarian.  I use it more in the "classical liberal" kind of way as, I think, most Libertarians do.  No sane Libertarian would put a yellow ribbon magnet on his/her car.

"Classical Liberal"? Interesting, what's your opinion on Locke's Tabula Rasa or on the Mazzinian notion of the Nation State?
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2008, 08:42:34 AM »

Funnily enough none of those three ideologies have any credibility(? Perhaps the wrong word - followers maybe?) outside the United States.

Libertarianism is just a silly form of US nationalism, however it is silly enough to be attacked while maintaing some sort of credibility which the fundies don't have.

Funny, given that we oppose nationalism. Also, Gully, how can you claim to be an anarchist when you defend the state at almost every opportunity?

Most libertarians tend to invoke the "founding fathers" and the "Constitution" as an arguement and believe that the US has been corrupted in recent times by "Big government" and often by association "Socialists". How is that not nationalism? Especially when considering that rugged individualism and hatred of central authority have always been "American" traits and that libertarianism has very little following outside the US.

Also I never claimed I was an Anarchist. Rather I am sympathetic towards certain branches of Anarchism. However, I don't think I have ever defended the state, at least not for the purposes of defending the state.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2008, 06:17:15 PM »

It's amazing how many people confused a sense of responsibility with being a spoiled rich poor hater
Having a sense of responsibility doesn't equate to favoring economic policies that were disproven by the 1930s. Yes, avoiding state over-regulation is important but so too is avoiding going too laissez faire/pro-corporate.

If one thing the last eight years have shown is that the super rich don't believe much in their own responibility.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2008, 07:38:50 PM »
« Edited: June 10, 2008, 07:47:43 PM by Frey seyn ist nichts; frey werden is der Himmel »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Dubious Claim. Do you know the level of Tax evasion corporations commit everywhere (or are they fighting for freedom)? Btw, Emsworth name me three corporations you consider to be good.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Not a good comparsion given the level of co-operation between Chevron, Halliburton & Co and the war effort. Though I guess that goes under cronyism.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

What if this "collective action" required as its idea giving power back to the state (on some level).

Mikado is right anyway, libertarians are promoting the idea, like conservatives, that there society is one which is both natural and orderly (and thus neo-ideological, as apparently only the government can be ideological), however in practice libertarianism would just give us jungle capitalism and neo-social darwinist approach to life. Soul destroying idea in practice. (I've often gotten across from Emsworth that he believes in the traditional liberal idea of the state, as a neutral arbiter of society's various interest groups, which he sees as bad as those interests are always likely to be against his idea of society. I wonder what is opinion on "natural monopolies" are and would should be done about public Transport. Because in America taking a private position basically means promoting the automobile and suburbization. Neutrality makes its own decisions.)

I also agree with the Mikado that libertarianism is possibly more dangerous than fundamentalism (at the present) because the former's humanist heritage and thus cultural respectibility and also how attaches itself to young "intellectuals". A position funnily enough taken up by forms of Trotskyism in Europe.

However that might change once the fundies start getting more sophisicated arguements.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.