Official DNC RBC Committee Discussion over MI and FL
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 02:13:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Official DNC RBC Committee Discussion over MI and FL
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10
Author Topic: Official DNC RBC Committee Discussion over MI and FL  (Read 11548 times)
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: May 31, 2008, 01:30:57 PM »

It's going to be really hard to find a compromise that both Obama and Hillary would feel comfortable with.  It will be very interesting to see how this plays out.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,355
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: May 31, 2008, 01:31:30 PM »

Did he just say the Clinton campaign accepts a 73-55 split? Isnt that acceptable for Obama?
yep
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: May 31, 2008, 01:43:15 PM »

Did he just say the Clinton campaign accepts a 73-55 split? Isnt that acceptable for Obama?

No. Obama wants a 64-64 split
Logged
ChrisFromNJ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,742


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -8.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: May 31, 2008, 01:48:37 PM »

Let me ask a question: Why should non-voters have rights?
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: May 31, 2008, 01:50:02 PM »

Donna Brazile is a massive freedom fighter as well.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,309


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: May 31, 2008, 01:50:37 PM »

Did he just say the Clinton campaign accepts a 73-55 split? Isnt that acceptable for Obama?

No. Obama wants a 64-64 split

Like it really matters. He will win regardless and it doesnt hurt to show you are compromising.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: May 31, 2008, 01:50:57 PM »

Did he just say the Clinton campaign accepts a 73-55 split? Isnt that acceptable for Obama?

Yes, he did.  Obama is blowing it badly.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: May 31, 2008, 01:55:16 PM »

Donna Brazile is a massive freedom fighter as well.
If by freedom fighter you mean fighting against freedom then yes. She doesn't want Michigan's votes to count.
Logged
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: May 31, 2008, 01:59:38 PM »

Donna Brazile is a massive freedom fighter as well.
If by freedom fighter you mean fighting against freedom then yes. She doesn't want Michigan's votes to count.

Don't talk, please.
Logged
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: May 31, 2008, 02:02:28 PM »

These guys make me want to be sedated.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: May 31, 2008, 02:07:00 PM »

These guys make me want to be sedated.
Donna Brazile is a massive freedom fighter as well.
If by freedom fighter you mean fighting against freedom then yes. She doesn't want Michigan's votes to count.

Don't talk, please.
Would you care to explain how I am wrong? It appears you would like to disenfranchise the 2.3 million people who voted in both swing states important to democrats winning the white house?

Also, there is nothing to suggest that somehow a disproportionate amount of Obama supporters stayed home than did Clinton supporters. That point is ridiculous.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: May 31, 2008, 02:07:47 PM »

Why is it that all the Clinton call-in people have Russian accents?
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,355
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: May 31, 2008, 02:19:23 PM »

Why is it that all the Clinton call-in people have Russian accents?

Because Clinton is really the Manchurian candidate
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,178
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: May 31, 2008, 02:30:02 PM »

These guys make me want to be sedated.
Donna Brazile is a massive freedom fighter as well.
If by freedom fighter you mean fighting against freedom then yes. She doesn't want Michigan's votes to count.
Don't talk, please.
Would you care to explain how I am wrong? It appears you would like to disenfranchise the 2.3 million people who voted in both swing states important to democrats winning the white house?

Also, there is nothing to suggest that somehow a disproportionate amount of Obama supporters stayed home than did Clinton supporters. That point is ridiculous.

I don't know how anyone could consider Michigan to have been a legitimate election: Obama wasn't even on the ballot.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,410
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: May 31, 2008, 02:34:55 PM »


I don't know how anyone could consider Michigan to have been a legitimate election: Obama wasn't even on the ballot.

Because he willingly took his name off of course.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: May 31, 2008, 02:44:30 PM »

These guys make me want to be sedated.
Donna Brazile is a massive freedom fighter as well.
If by freedom fighter you mean fighting against freedom then yes. She doesn't want Michigan's votes to count.
Don't talk, please.
Would you care to explain how I am wrong? It appears you would like to disenfranchise the 2.3 million people who voted in both swing states important to democrats winning the white house?

Also, there is nothing to suggest that somehow a disproportionate amount of Obama supporters stayed home than did Clinton supporters. That point is ridiculous.

I don't know how anyone could consider Michigan to have been a legitimate election: Obama wasn't even on the ballot.
And they are considering giving him the uncommitteds. So he's gonna get extra votes, now. So I really don't see what you're complainging about.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: May 31, 2008, 03:25:20 PM »


I don't know how anyone could consider Michigan to have been a legitimate election: Obama wasn't even on the ballot.

Because he willingly took his name off of course.

Because it was a non-binding "beauty contest" not recognized as allocating delegates by the DNC.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,410
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: May 31, 2008, 03:30:59 PM »


I don't know how anyone could consider Michigan to have been a legitimate election: Obama wasn't even on the ballot.

Because he willingly took his name off of course.

Because it was a non-binding "beauty contest" not recognized as allocating delegates by the DNC.


That's fine, but the DNC doesn't run Michigan elections. It was a perfectly legitimate election--internal to Michigan--for determining delegates to the Michigan caucuses. Michigan let Obama on the ballot and never told him he had to take his name off.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: May 31, 2008, 03:46:12 PM »


I don't know how anyone could consider Michigan to have been a legitimate election: Obama wasn't even on the ballot.

Because he willingly took his name off of course.

Because it was a non-binding "beauty contest" not recognized as allocating delegates by the DNC.


That's fine, but the DNC doesn't run Michigan elections. It was a perfectly legitimate election--internal to Michigan--for determining delegates to the Michigan caucuses. Michigan let Obama on the ballot and never told him he had to take his name off.


It's not really internal to Michigan in this sense: The point of the primary is to allocate delegates to the Democratic National Convention (though yes, I'm aware there's also an intermediate step).  The DNC does in fact control how many delegates each state is allowed to send to the convention.  At the time this vote was held, the DNC maintained that Michigan would not be allowed to have any delegates at the convention.

So Obama can hardly be "faulted" for taking his name off the ballot.  It goes completely against all standards of a free and fair election to then retroactively say that the vote counted after it's already been held.  How would we react if Chavez held a nonbinding referendum on his rule in Venezuela, and then, after the result is known and he's won, say "Oh, I guess that actually did count after all"?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: May 31, 2008, 03:54:44 PM »

Why is it that all the Clinton call-in people have Russian accents?

Because Clinton is really the Manchurian candidate

Ah, wouldn't that be the Siberian cabinet.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: May 31, 2008, 04:16:42 PM »

Hey, remember when Hillary herself said that the elections in MI and FL weren't legitimate?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: May 31, 2008, 04:17:45 PM »

Hey, remember when Hillary herself said that the elections in MI and FL weren't legitimate?

Yes, but she must have had a change of heart Smiley
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: May 31, 2008, 04:44:12 PM »

Hey, remember when Hillary herself said that the elections in MI and FL weren't legitimate?

Yes, but she must have had a change of heart Smiley

No, she had a change of inevitability.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: May 31, 2008, 04:45:11 PM »

Hey, remember when Hillary herself said that the elections in MI and FL weren't legitimate?

Yes, but she must have had a change of heart Smiley

No, she had a change of inevitability.

No, she had a change of "the states that I had been pandering to have now already voted".
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: May 31, 2008, 04:59:02 PM »


I don't know how anyone could consider Michigan to have been a legitimate election: Obama wasn't even on the ballot.

Because he willingly took his name off of course.

Because it was a non-binding "beauty contest" not recognized as allocating delegates by the DNC.

This was a state sanctioned election. It was a race Obama conceded because he knew he had no chance of winning it either way.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 12 queries.