Official South Dakota and Montana Democratic Primary Results Discussion Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 03:20:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Official South Dakota and Montana Democratic Primary Results Discussion Thread
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 19
Author Topic: Official South Dakota and Montana Democratic Primary Results Discussion Thread  (Read 28180 times)
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 03, 2008, 01:14:13 PM »

I combined the two states, because its easier for me to keep up with it.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2008, 01:25:13 PM »

Might as well, honestly.

A note about South Dakota:  they have an unusual counting method.  Ballots are not tabulated at the polling places in any way.  They are driven to the county seat where they are counted up as optical scan ballots.  The lack of a verification process at the polls speeds things up slightly, I'd think, but this year the news outlets are implying this method slows stuff down.

Also, Shannon and Todd Counties do not have county seats and must drive their ballots to Hot Springs (90 miles from Batesland) and Winner (65 miles from Parmelee), respectively.  In other words, their results are going to be really late.  If anyone remembers Tim Johnson's win in 2002(?), that was what happened.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2008, 01:27:43 PM »

Also, Shannon and Todd Counties do not have county seats and must drive their ballots to Hot Springs (90 miles from Batesland) and Winner (65 miles from Parmelee), respectively.  In other words, their results are going to be really late.  If anyone remembers Tim Johnson's win in 2002(?), that was what happened.

Further evidence that Indians should not be allowed to vote.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2008, 03:18:37 PM »

When should we expect the pointless exit poll numbers to start leaking? 5 PM?
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2008, 03:21:25 PM »

When should we expect the pointless exit poll numbers to start leaking? 5 PM?

I'm assuming.  Hey, remember, there are only two more rounds of exit polls in this federal election cycle, today and November 4.  The National Network News don't cover state primaries that much, which I guess is kind of a blessing.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2008, 03:24:03 PM »
« Edited: June 03, 2008, 04:06:50 PM by Mr. Morden »

When should we expect the pointless exit poll numbers to start leaking? 5 PM?

From the May 6th primary discussion:

This is how it tends to go:

5pm ET: The exit polling consortium releases their numbers to the networks and other media outlets, but the networks won't publicly reveal who's leading or anything like that.

~5:10pm ET: An AP story is released, which provides some fairly useless demographic info about who voted.  Over the course of the next hour, additional stories are written with some slightly less useless demographic info, along with "voters who care about X voted for candidate Y by a 72-28% margin".

~5:30pm ET: The cable networks start to drip, drip, drip with nuggets like "voters over 65 voted for Clinton 61-38", which tells you *a little*, but it's never enough to deduce the overall numbers.  (Fox News Channel tends to give away more of this stuff than the others do.)

~5:45pm ET: Websites like Drudge leak the early overall exit poll numbers that the networks won't tell you.  Who is leading, and by how much.  Of course, those leaked numbers have typically been too Obama-friendly this cycle, so who knows what you can deduce from it anyway.

That last part....leaks of the overall numbers.....doesn't always happen.  On "bigger" primary nights, like Indiana / North Carolina, there were leaks of overall numbers.  With West Virginia, no one bothered to leak overall numbers.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2008, 03:28:11 PM »

Drudge has this:

"HILLARY CAMPAIGN EXPECTS 25-POINT WIN IN S DAKOTA, TOP SOURCES TELL DRUDGE..." DEVELOPING...

hmm... I hope that's based on internal polling and not the ARG poll for their sake. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little concerned now.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2008, 03:33:09 PM »

They had that up before polls opened this morning, too. *Yawn*
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2008, 03:34:45 PM »

Drudge has this:

"HILLARY CAMPAIGN EXPECTS 25-POINT WIN IN S DAKOTA, TOP SOURCES TELL DRUDGE..." DEVELOPING...

hmm... I hope that's based on internal polling and not the ARG poll for their sake. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little concerned now.

I'm not worried.  That would only give her a net gain of roughly 3 delegates, likely to be negated by Montana, where I expect an 8-9 point win for Obama.  Plus, he is only 26-30 delegates away depending on who you look at.  Even if he loses South Dakota, he will still probably get 6 delegates, bringing it down to 20-24 delegates (if no more supers come out in the next 330 minutes).  So, don't worry, my friend.  Obama will get the nomination, most likely tonight and we will be able to start going after John McBush.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 03, 2008, 03:37:03 PM »

Drudge has this:

"HILLARY CAMPAIGN EXPECTS 25-POINT WIN IN S DAKOTA, TOP SOURCES TELL DRUDGE..." DEVELOPING...

hmm... I hope that's based on internal polling and not the ARG poll for their sake. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little concerned now.

I'm not worried.  That would only give her a net gain of roughly 3 delegates, likely to be negated by Montana, where I expect an 8-9 point win for Obama.  Plus, he is only 26-30 delegates away depending on who you look at.  Even if he loses South Dakota, he will still probably get 6 delegates, bringing it down to 20-24 delegates (if no more supers come out in the next 330 minutes).  So, don't worry, my friend.  Obama will get the nomination, most likely tonight and we will be able to start going after John McBush.

She may win, but 25 points are absolutely absurd.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 03, 2008, 03:38:58 PM »

Drudge has this:

"HILLARY CAMPAIGN EXPECTS 25-POINT WIN IN S DAKOTA, TOP SOURCES TELL DRUDGE..." DEVELOPING...

hmm... I hope that's based on internal polling and not the ARG poll for their sake. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little concerned now.

I'm not worried.  That would only give her a net gain of roughly 3 delegates, likely to be negated by Montana, where I expect an 8-9 point win for Obama.  Plus, he is only 26-30 delegates away depending on who you look at.  Even if he loses South Dakota, he will still probably get 6 delegates, bringing it down to 20-24 delegates (if no more supers come out in the next 330 minutes).  So, don't worry, my friend.  Obama will get the nomination, most likely tonight and we will be able to start going after John McBush.

You don't think losing South Dakota by 25 points would be embarrassing?  There's no excuse for that. He's swept all of the other states in that part of the country.  That would be beyond pathetic.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 03, 2008, 03:39:54 PM »

Drudge has this:

"HILLARY CAMPAIGN EXPECTS 25-POINT WIN IN S DAKOTA, TOP SOURCES TELL DRUDGE..." DEVELOPING...

hmm... I hope that's based on internal polling and not the ARG poll for their sake. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little concerned now.

I'm not worried.  That would only give her a net gain of roughly 3 delegates, likely to be negated by Montana, where I expect an 8-9 point win for Obama.  Plus, he is only 26-30 delegates away depending on who you look at.  Even if he loses South Dakota, he will still probably get 6 delegates, bringing it down to 20-24 delegates (if no more supers come out in the next 330 minutes).  So, don't worry, my friend.  Obama will get the nomination, most likely tonight and we will be able to start going after John McBush.

She may win, but 25 points are absolutely absurd.

There is no excuse for her winning, even by a point.  It would look very bad for Obama.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 03, 2008, 03:40:28 PM »

Let's not forget that, faced with the opportunity to stir up bad news for Clinton and good news for Obama, Drudge going to jump at it.  He's clearly not un-fond of Obama, and we all know what he thinks of Clinton.
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 03, 2008, 03:42:41 PM »

Any exit polling data yet?
Logged
Aizen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,510


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -9.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 03, 2008, 03:43:25 PM »

Drudge has this:

"HILLARY CAMPAIGN EXPECTS 25-POINT WIN IN S DAKOTA, TOP SOURCES TELL DRUDGE..." DEVELOPING...

hmm... I hope that's based on internal polling and not the ARG poll for their sake. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little concerned now.

I'm not worried.  That would only give her a net gain of roughly 3 delegates, likely to be negated by Montana, where I expect an 8-9 point win for Obama.  Plus, he is only 26-30 delegates away depending on who you look at.  Even if he loses South Dakota, he will still probably get 6 delegates, bringing it down to 20-24 delegates (if no more supers come out in the next 330 minutes).  So, don't worry, my friend.  Obama will get the nomination, most likely tonight and we will be able to start going after John McBush.

She may win, but 25 points are absolutely absurd.

There is no excuse for her winning, even by a point.  It would look very bad for Obama.


Agreed. I have faith SD will go Obama though.
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 03, 2008, 03:45:02 PM »

Drudge has this:

"HILLARY CAMPAIGN EXPECTS 25-POINT WIN IN S DAKOTA, TOP SOURCES TELL DRUDGE..." DEVELOPING...

hmm... I hope that's based on internal polling and not the ARG poll for their sake. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little concerned now.

I'm not worried.  That would only give her a net gain of roughly 3 delegates, likely to be negated by Montana, where I expect an 8-9 point win for Obama.  Plus, he is only 26-30 delegates away depending on who you look at.  Even if he loses South Dakota, he will still probably get 6 delegates, bringing it down to 20-24 delegates (if no more supers come out in the next 330 minutes).  So, don't worry, my friend.  Obama will get the nomination, most likely tonight and we will be able to start going after John McBush.

She may win, but 25 points are absolutely absurd.

There is no excuse for her winning, even by a point.  It would look very bad for Obama.


Agreed. I have faith SD will go Obama though.

Me too.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 03, 2008, 03:54:18 PM »


The news organizations themselves don't even have any exit polling data yet.  They won't get it until after 5pm.
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 03, 2008, 03:54:54 PM »


The news organizations themselves don't even have any exit polling data yet.  They won't get it until after 5pm.


Gotcha, thanks Mr. M
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 03, 2008, 03:58:57 PM »

I would like to be the first to give a pre-lol to ARG.
Logged
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: June 03, 2008, 04:00:20 PM »

I would like to be the first to give a pre-lol to ARG.

seconded.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: June 03, 2008, 04:00:32 PM »

I would like to be the first to give a pre-lol to ARG.

A lot of people already gave "pre-lols" in thread for the poll already.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 03, 2008, 04:04:04 PM »

I would like to be the first to give a pre-lol to ARG.

Wait, are you saying this Hil-mentum isn't real?:


Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: June 03, 2008, 04:10:49 PM »

Fittingly, on the last primary day, round 1 of useless exit mania reaches new heights in useless-ness.  Here is the first exit poll info:

link

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: June 03, 2008, 04:12:42 PM »

Fittingly, on the last primary day, round 1 of useless exit mania reaches new heights in useless-ness.  Here is the first exit poll info:

link

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


OMG IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: June 03, 2008, 04:14:56 PM »

South Dakota:

Should Obama pick Clinton as VP?
Yes 55%
No 41%

Among Obama supporters:
Yes 40%
No 56%

"fascinating"
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 19  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 12 queries.