Opinion of our space program and funding.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:09:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of our space program and funding.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: How important to you is NASA funding for space exploration and research?
#1
Democrat: NASA funding should be given highest priority.
 
#2
Democrat: moderate priority.
 
#3
Democrat: low priority.
 
#4
Republican: NASA funding should be given highest priority.
 
#5
Republican: moderate priority.
 
#6
Republican: low priority.
 
#7
No Opinion
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 40

Author Topic: Opinion of our space program and funding.  (Read 3744 times)
cannonia
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 960
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.42, S: -1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 04, 2008, 01:56:43 PM »

Privatization is the way of the future, but we need to keep NASA or a successor agency around for military purposes.
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 05, 2008, 11:36:32 PM »

Moderate Priority.

Whilst I do support the funding of NASA and her many pet projects, such as exploring different worlds, there are numerous of other programs that the Government of the United States should invest her funds too. However, NASA should be a higher priority than some pet projects conceived by the US Government such as the wasteful War on Drugs.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 06, 2008, 08:39:59 AM »

I think NASA needs to go away completely....with the exception of mission relating to orbital satellites for weather, communication, etc..

I don't give a phuck if there is water on Mars or if there was life there.

CUT MY GASOLINE PRICES with the savings.

LOL, I doubt there'd be enough to cut your gas prices by any noticeable amount by just gutting NASA.
Logged
Albus Dumbledore
Havelock Vetinari
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,917
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the


Political Matrix
E: -0.71, S: -2.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 06, 2008, 10:38:54 AM »

Privatization is the way of the future, but we need to keep NASA or a successor agency around for military purposes.
The 1980s called. They want you back.
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 06, 2008, 10:42:15 AM »

Agree with Ernest on this one...

There is a huge amount of science that can be done in space with a relatively minimal amount of funding.  For the cost of fixing the toilets on the ISS, we could have had a few good unmanned science projects.

If we want to do something serious with manned spaceflight (permanent base on the Moon, for example), sure, we can talk again.  But otherwise, NASA is wasting most of its money right now.
Logged
Albus Dumbledore
Havelock Vetinari
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,917
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the


Political Matrix
E: -0.71, S: -2.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: June 06, 2008, 10:43:24 AM »

We need to make the space/tech budget be self-financing and indexed to inflation so congress can't cut it or dismantle programs.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: June 07, 2008, 01:29:26 AM »

Moderate priority. Certainly important, though not as much as things like health care, infrastructure, education, etc.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: June 13, 2008, 04:02:40 PM »

Well, we should consider privatising low-eath orbit operations, because private companies are growing reliable in providing low-earth orbit transportation and infrastructure, manned and unmanned. This includes space to ground infrastructure (sattelites) and space to space infrastructure (habitations and manned and unmanned vehicles). However, Military applications should be taken over by the Air Force (which already has a space program two-thirds the size of NASA's). NASA's deep space, higher earth orbit, interplanetary and interstellar unmanned science projects should be contracted out to Universities. NASA should be maintained as a national research center for space-based purpulsion systems and manned earth departure vehicles. I would say that this is a high priority in funding and law. This opens the possibility of increase economic growth in the present and future.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.24 seconds with 14 queries.