Please don't get mad at me, but why did Gore lose Tennessee? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 10:05:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Please don't get mad at me, but why did Gore lose Tennessee? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Please don't get mad at me, but why did Gore lose Tennessee?  (Read 35851 times)
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,546


« on: June 09, 2008, 12:08:27 PM »

The conventional wisdom is that Perot took votes from Bush in the South, and from Clinton in the North.

I am wondering what would have happened without Perot on the ballot in 1992.  I think Clinton would have likely lost Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, and Tennessee in the South, Ohio and Wisconsin in the midwest, and Nevada, Colorado, and Montana in the West.  I think he also would have lost New Jersey.  This would have given Bush a 269-267 EV victory.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 14 queries.