IA Rasmussen: Obama leads by 10
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 12:31:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  IA Rasmussen: Obama leads by 10
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IA Rasmussen: Obama leads by 10  (Read 1704 times)
ChrisFromNJ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,742


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -8.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 14, 2008, 03:52:50 PM »
« edited: July 14, 2008, 04:00:51 PM by New Deal Democrat »

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/iowa/election_2008_iowa_presidential_election

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2008, 04:00:40 PM »

Added (with leaners).
Logged
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2008, 04:04:40 PM »

Good. McCain hasn't lead in one Iowa poll.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2008, 04:19:04 PM »

I don't get why Obama is kicking ass in all these states today (MI, IA, MN, SD) yet he's only leading in the Rasmussen national poll by 1% or 2%?
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,072


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2008, 04:20:28 PM »

I don't get why Obama is kicking ass in all these states today (MI, IA, MN, SD) yet he's only leading in the Rasmussen national poll by 1% or 2%?

Summer polling.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2008, 04:22:06 PM »

I don't get why Obama is kicking ass in all these states today (MI, IA, MN, SD) yet he's only leading in the Rasmussen national poll by 1% or 2%?

To be fair to Rasmussen, these polls are all from data collected on Thursday or Friday while the tracking poll covers Friday through Sunday. Although Obama's lead in the tracking poll on Friday was quite small as well (1 point w/o leaners, 2 points with).
Logged
Aizen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,510


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -9.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2008, 04:55:06 PM »

Iowa is a lost cause for the Republicans.
Logged
ChrisFromNJ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,742


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -8.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2008, 04:57:45 PM »

I don't get why Obama is kicking ass in all these states today (MI, IA, MN, SD) yet he's only leading in the Rasmussen national poll by 1% or 2%?

Summer polling.

Or strength in the Midwest states.
Logged
auburntiger
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,233
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.61, S: 0.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 14, 2008, 04:59:45 PM »

I'm very surprised McCain hasn't led in one poll here, yet
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 14, 2008, 05:00:28 PM »

I don't get why Obama is kicking ass in all these states today (MI, IA, MN, SD) yet he's only leading in the Rasmussen national poll by 1% or 2%?

Summer polling.

Or strength in the Midwest states.

no, that's not possible, and anyone that thinks that is drinking Obama kool-aid!
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 14, 2008, 05:37:21 PM »

Iowa is a lost cause for the Republicans.

Don't tell them that.  If they can spend money there, hoping to swing MN and IA, they won't be spending as much in VA, MI, PA, NM, and CO.
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 14, 2008, 06:28:27 PM »

Remember, McCain skipped the Iowa caucuses because he was doing so badly in Iowa.

Obama won the Democrat caucus in Iowa, while McCain came in fourth.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 14, 2008, 08:14:26 PM »

Smiley
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 14, 2008, 09:09:19 PM »

Remember, McCain skipped the Iowa caucuses because he was doing so badly in Iowa.

Obama won the Democratic caucus in Iowa, while McCain came in fourth.


Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 15, 2008, 12:11:29 AM »

It would be a miracle if McCain could turn around IA in the next 3 months. Now poll Indiana ...
Logged
Vsanto5
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 290
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: 3.23

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 15, 2008, 01:28:59 AM »

Good numbers so far, although I do agree that states like indiana, virginia, north carolina, Mississippi, Oregon, Arizona are not polled more frequently.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 15, 2008, 02:14:27 AM »
« Edited: July 15, 2008, 02:16:57 AM by Lunar »

There's no way that Arizona's demographic growth (which has been a lot of OLD PEOPLE!) in the Democratic direction outweighs McCain's home-state advantage enough that the state could be 'in play' in 2008.  I disagree on that state needing more polling.

If the state was remotely interesting Obama would be including it in his, what, 17-19 state ad buy that included like 3 Kerry states from '04.  If North Dakota, Virginia, Alaska, Iowa, Colorado, Virginia, New Mexico, Montana, Nevada, Georgia, Ohio, Missouri, and Missouri are worthy of ads, I'm pretty sure Arizona would be included too if his people thought they had a chance of winning it.
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 15, 2008, 09:55:08 AM »

There's no way that Arizona's demographic growth (which has been a lot of OLD PEOPLE!) in the Democratic direction outweighs McCain's home-state advantage enough that the state could be 'in play' in 2008.  I disagree on that state needing more polling.

If the state was remotely interesting Obama would be including it in his, what, 17-19 state ad buy that included like 3 Kerry states from '04.  If North Dakota, Virginia, Alaska, Iowa, Colorado, Virginia, New Mexico, Montana, Nevada, Georgia, Ohio, Missouri, and Missouri are worthy of ads, I'm pretty sure Arizona would be included too if his people thought they had a chance of winning it.

Sorry Lunar, but the "old people" relocating to Arizona are largely above average income Republicans.

Look at places like Green Valley and Leisure World (McCain actually had a good joke about it a few years ago when he called it "seizure world").

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 14 queries.