Selection: Santorum? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 06:33:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Selection: Santorum? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Selection: Santorum?  (Read 3667 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: August 28, 2008, 08:16:53 PM »

Let me enjoy the final hours that I have left to float these rumors, guys.  Wink

Santorum matches Biden in every way - http://townhall.com/Columnists/RichardOlivastro/2008/08/27/selecting_rick_santorum_checkmates_biden
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2008, 08:46:05 PM »

phil, i thought you were a mccain supporter?

why do you want him to lose?

Haha, the dislike for this guy is really overstated.

By the way, for all the geniuses that make the jokes about him swinging PA, I've never argued that Santorum would even help him here, let alone be the deciding factor in McCain's favor.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: August 28, 2008, 08:53:48 PM »


He'd totally satisfy any wary conservatives. He's young. He's a tough, talented debater.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Well, his ideology is also misunderstood. He got booted in a bad year by a man with a legendary name. I don't doubt that he was personally unpopular that year regardless of national politics and whoever was running against him. Is he as unpopular as people think? No, I don't believe so.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

No because Daschle added hardly anything to the ticket.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2008, 09:05:11 PM »

phil, santorum compared homosexuality to having sex with dogs.

mccain doesnt want to go there.

In addition Santorum would by default unify the democratic and liberal base.

Santorum doesn't irritate the Democratic voters that McCain still has a chance with.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2008, 09:08:54 PM »

phil, santorum compared homosexuality to having sex with dogs.

mccain doesnt want to go there.

In addition Santorum would by default unify the democratic and liberal base.

Santorum doesn't irritate the Democratic voters that McCain still has a chance with.

Really?Huh? The only democratic voters Mccain has a chance with are older women and they are pro-abortion rights. Also Mccain has a chance to do relatively well with gays but yeah with Santorum..lololol

Uh, what? I'm talking about white, blue collar, Catholic voters.

And since when are older women "Pro Abortion rights?"

You really do fail to understand so many simple concepts.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #5 on: August 28, 2008, 09:19:53 PM »

phil, santorum compared homosexuality to having sex with dogs.

mccain doesnt want to go there.

In addition Santorum would by default unify the democratic and liberal base.

Santorum doesn't irritate the Democratic voters that McCain still has a chance with.

Really?Huh? The only democratic voters Mccain has a chance with are older women and they are pro-abortion rights. Also Mccain has a chance to do relatively well with gays but yeah with Santorum..lololol


And since when are older women "Pro Abortion rights?"



Trust me Hillary voters are pro-abortion/women's rights. Those who aren't already vote republican.

Yay for simplistic thinking! I'm sure every Hillary supporter especially in states like Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, etc. are 100% Pro Choice/"Women's rights."
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #6 on: August 28, 2008, 10:43:34 PM »


Uh, what? I'm talking about white, blue collar, Catholic voters.


You said it, not me. Exactly how did Ricky doo do amongst these voters in 06'?

Just because he didn't win them (again, consider his opponent) doesn't mean he doesn't have sway with them. McCain-Santorum vs. Obama-Biden would be nothing like Santorum vs. Casey. Obama-Biden doesn't have the type of appeal that the Casey name has with white, blue collar, Catholic voters.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #7 on: August 28, 2008, 10:59:43 PM »


While I disagree that this voting block we've argued over is as organized as you've made them out to be, when you lose an election by 17+ points, it stands to reason you've alienated just about every voting block there is. Don't get me wrong; I wouldn't have expected Rick to beat Casey but I would've figured he'd come closer than 17+points.

I think Santorum would be disaster for McCain amongst these voters.

I really have no idea how you can believe that "white, blue collar, Catholic voters" aren't a major, organized group especially in a state like PA. I really don't understand that. But, hey, whatever.



I never said they were 100% pro choice dumbass.

Oh, ok! So the comment about them being Pro Choice or actually voting Republican meant what exactly?

 
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'm not expecting to win Hillary's original base (her personal fan club). However, plenty of blue collar, populist types that would have been huge for Edwards ended up going for her over Obama. They might not be the Hillary fanatics but they consider themselves more loyal to Hillary than Obama. Right now, a lot of them don't have a candidate to back. Let's see what happens.



Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Ok, great!  Roll Eyes
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.