Then you believe the U.S. should not have a passenger rail system? Because we wouldn't today if Amtrak were not government funded.
Geesh, putting words into my mouth is an epidemic this week. I believe the US should have a PRIVATE train system as it did before Amtrak was created. Since the creation of Amtrak in 1971 they have not showed a profit and only have been a LAG on the US Govt. And if you've ever ridden on Amtrak you'd quickly see how crappy of a system it is. The best thing to do would be for the government to subsidize RAILS and open up the market for competition similar to but less restricted then the current airline system.
Wouldn't the fair thing be to privatize the road system, too?
I never said to privatize either the rails or the road system. I believe the RAILS are an extension of the roads and therefore fall under the Constitution.
Some of the tracks that Amtrak are used are private and don't belong to them. This is a problem for Amtrak, because priority is given to freight. Anyways, to give Amtrak a level playing field, I think that more tracks need to be constructed, and belong to the government, particularly ones that are good for high speed.