Dependent Child and Income Tax Credit (Law'd) (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 27, 2024, 11:54:47 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Atlas Fantasy Elections

Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)

Dependent Child and Income Tax Credit (Law'd) (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Author

Topic: Dependent Child and Income Tax Credit (Law'd) (Read 10698 times)

Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp

Posts: 8,705

Re: Welfare Reform (Placeholder) Act (Debate Open)

« on: October 12, 2008, 06:54:35 AM »

Aye

Logged

Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp

Posts: 8,705

Re: Welfare Reform Act (Debate Open)

« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2008, 06:04:25 AM »

Aye x 2

Logged

Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp

Posts: 8,705

	Re: Welfare Reform Act (Debate Open) « Reply #2 on: October 20, 2008, 05:32:32 PM »
	« Edited: October 21, 2008, 05:02:39 PM by Jas »

I have issue with section 4, in that potentially it rewards people to fall just short of earning $35k, to the benefit of $6,968 - which I think is unfair on those people who would be earning in the $35k-$42k bracket.

I'd look for an amendment to deal with this. I'll put forward the following, though am happy to discuss alterations to it as may be appropriate.

Amendment:
That the following be added to section 4:
"Persons benefiting under this section, shall be limited in their entitlements such that their total annual household income may not be exceed $35,000."

Logged

Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp

Posts: 8,705

Re: Welfare Reform Act (Debate Open)

« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2008, 05:02:49 PM »

Quote from: vom Brenner der Großvater on October 21, 2008, 02:56:40 PM

Quote from: Jas on October 20, 2008, 05:32:32 PM

I have issue with section 4, in that potentially it rewards people to fall just short of earning $35k, to the benefit of $6,968 - which I think is unfair on those people who would be earning in the $35k-$42k bracket.

I'd look for an amendment to deal with this. I'll put forward the following, though am happy to discuss alterations to it as may be appropriate.

Amendment:
1. Section 4 to be renamed Section 4a.
2. Section 4b to be added as follows:
"Persons benefiting under section 4a of this Act, shall be limited in their entitlements such that their total annual household income may not be exceed $35,000."

I don't like your numbering scheme. Angry