Why is ''(former) bellweather'' Missouri so Conservative? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 08:42:14 am
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Why is ''(former) bellweather'' Missouri so Conservative? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why is ''(former) bellweather'' Missouri so Conservative?  (Read 2604 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,757


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
« on: November 05, 2008, 04:44:57 am »
Yes, it needs to lose its bellweather status. Other contenders before this election included New Mexico and Delaware, and yes, they failed, too.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,757


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2008, 05:07:43 am »
Quote from: PiT (The Physicist) on November 05, 2008, 04:47:24 am
     OH & VA were the real bellwethers here. They voted almost exactly the national average.

Virginia wasn't a bellwether for Clinton's elections.
Ohio has a better track record, but they're just too Republican in some elections, like 1960 and 2000.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.