2008- Kerry/Bayh vs. Huckabee/Pawlenty
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:38:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  2008- Kerry/Bayh vs. Huckabee/Pawlenty
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2008- Kerry/Bayh vs. Huckabee/Pawlenty  (Read 2459 times)
RRusso1982
Rookie
**
Posts: 207
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 01, 2008, 02:00:37 PM »

In 2004, the Kerry/Edwards ticket wins Ohio, and edges out President Bush 50-49 in the popular vote and 272-266 in the Electoral College.  John Kerry takes office in 2005.  Iraq is still a disaster and Katrina is still a disaster on Kerry's watch.  In 2006, the Republicans win all the senate races they lost, except for Santorum, and pick up seats in NJ and MD.  In 2008, Kerry is running for reelection.  The week before the Democratic National Convention, the news about Vice President Edwards's affair comes out.  Edwards quits the ticket and President Kerry chooses Evan Bayh to replace him.  On the Republican ticket is former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee and he chooses Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty as his running mate.  In the middle of President Kerry's reelection campaign, the financial meltdown happens.  What does the electoral map look like?
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2008, 03:06:54 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2008, 03:14:44 PM »

I think Edwards affair was related to making videos for his presidential run and might not have occurred.
Logged
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,294
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2008, 11:04:11 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

That map strangely, but predictably, gives me a boner.

Pretty accurate map.
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2008, 03:36:27 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

That map strangely, but predictably, gives me a boner.

Pretty accurate map.

Well...that's more information than I needed.
Logged
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,294
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2008, 12:58:06 AM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

That map strangely, but predictably, gives me a boner.

Pretty accurate map.

Well...that's more information than I needed.

If that was too much info ... Excuse my language and I apologize sir.
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2008, 06:25:21 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.
Logged
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,294
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2008, 06:31:11 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2008, 06:42:09 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.
Logged
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,294
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2008, 07:00:02 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.

True, it depends how truly sucky Kerry is. Also another question, if PA swings to Huckabee, is there a possibility that he also wins NJ? Those 2 states often vote the same way.
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2008, 07:07:13 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.

True, it depends how truly sucky Kerry is. Also another question, if PA swings to Huckabee, is there a possibility that he also wins NJ? Those 2 states often vote the same way.

I suppose it's possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.
Logged
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,294
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2008, 07:09:22 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.

True, it depends how truly sucky Kerry is. Also another question, if PA swings to Huckabee, is there a possibility that he also wins NJ? Those 2 states often vote the same way.

I suppose it's possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.

I know this friend from NJ called Uncle Mike, he says that wherever PA goes, NJ probably goes as well, he also said that was the same with NY, but with a lesser extent.
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2008, 07:19:21 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.

True, it depends how truly sucky Kerry is. Also another question, if PA swings to Huckabee, is there a possibility that he also wins NJ? Those 2 states often vote the same way.

I suppose it's possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.

I know this friend from NJ called Uncle Mike, he says that wherever PA goes, NJ probably goes as well, he also said that was the same with NY, but with a lesser extent.

Well considering Michigan is going to Huckabee in this scenario, NJ would definitely be in contention. I think the real factor would be how the economic crisis would be perceived in this world, whether it would be blamed on Regan/Bush deregulation, failure of the Kerry administration to adequately regulate the financial sector, or if Kerry would be blamed simply because he was in office. My guess would be a mixture of all three, in which case Huckabee's campaign for "Governor of America" would definitely appeal to workers in Michigan and Pennsylvania, while New Jersey's combo of blue collar workers and New York commuters could really send the state either way. My gut says NJ would stay in Kerry's column, but I have of course been wrong in the past, and will continue to be.
Logged
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,294
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2008, 07:22:09 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.

True, it depends how truly sucky Kerry is. Also another question, if PA swings to Huckabee, is there a possibility that he also wins NJ? Those 2 states often vote the same way.

I suppose it's possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.

I know this friend from NJ called Uncle Mike, he says that wherever PA goes, NJ probably goes as well, he also said that was the same with NY, but with a lesser extent.

Well considering Michigan is going to Huckabee in this scenario, NJ would definitely be in contention. I think the real factor would be how the economic crisis would be perceived in this world, whether it would be blamed on Regan/Bush deregulation, failure of the Kerry administration to adequately regulate the financial sector, or if Kerry would be blamed simply because he was in office. My guess would be a mixture of all three, in which case Huckabee's campaign for "Governor of America" would definitely appeal to workers in Michigan and Pennsylvania, while New Jersey's combo of blue collar workers and New York commuters could really send the state either way. My gut says NJ would stay in Kerry's column, but I have of course been wrong in the past, and will continue to be.

True, I also wonder how WA and OR would react in this scenario, as they were close for a very short amount of time in OTL.
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2008, 07:30:18 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.

True, it depends how truly sucky Kerry is. Also another question, if PA swings to Huckabee, is there a possibility that he also wins NJ? Those 2 states often vote the same way.

I suppose it's possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.

I know this friend from NJ called Uncle Mike, he says that wherever PA goes, NJ probably goes as well, he also said that was the same with NY, but with a lesser extent.

Well considering Michigan is going to Huckabee in this scenario, NJ would definitely be in contention. I think the real factor would be how the economic crisis would be perceived in this world, whether it would be blamed on Regan/Bush deregulation, failure of the Kerry administration to adequately regulate the financial sector, or if Kerry would be blamed simply because he was in office. My guess would be a mixture of all three, in which case Huckabee's campaign for "Governor of America" would definitely appeal to workers in Michigan and Pennsylvania, while New Jersey's combo of blue collar workers and New York commuters could really send the state either way. My gut says NJ would stay in Kerry's column, but I have of course been wrong in the past, and will continue to be.

True, I also wonder how WA and OR would react in this scenario, as they were close for a very short amount of time in OTL.

I feel that Oregon and Washington's brief closeness in this election can be attributed to McCain's appeal to independents and his environmental record, both of which Huckabee lacks. These blue states go to Kerry.
Logged
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,294
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 11, 2008, 07:32:17 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.

True, it depends how truly sucky Kerry is. Also another question, if PA swings to Huckabee, is there a possibility that he also wins NJ? Those 2 states often vote the same way.

I suppose it's possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.

I know this friend from NJ called Uncle Mike, he says that wherever PA goes, NJ probably goes as well, he also said that was the same with NY, but with a lesser extent.

Well considering Michigan is going to Huckabee in this scenario, NJ would definitely be in contention. I think the real factor would be how the economic crisis would be perceived in this world, whether it would be blamed on Regan/Bush deregulation, failure of the Kerry administration to adequately regulate the financial sector, or if Kerry would be blamed simply because he was in office. My guess would be a mixture of all three, in which case Huckabee's campaign for "Governor of America" would definitely appeal to workers in Michigan and Pennsylvania, while New Jersey's combo of blue collar workers and New York commuters could really send the state either way. My gut says NJ would stay in Kerry's column, but I have of course been wrong in the past, and will continue to be.

True, I also wonder how WA and OR would react in this scenario, as they were close for a very short amount of time in OTL.

I feel that Oregon and Washington's brief closeness in this election can be attributed to McCain's appeal to independents and his environmental record, both of which Huckabee lacks. These blue states go to Kerry.

I see, so, is there anything else needed to be discussed?
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 11, 2008, 07:37:41 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.

True, it depends how truly sucky Kerry is. Also another question, if PA swings to Huckabee, is there a possibility that he also wins NJ? Those 2 states often vote the same way.

I suppose it's possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.

I know this friend from NJ called Uncle Mike, he says that wherever PA goes, NJ probably goes as well, he also said that was the same with NY, but with a lesser extent.

Well considering Michigan is going to Huckabee in this scenario, NJ would definitely be in contention. I think the real factor would be how the economic crisis would be perceived in this world, whether it would be blamed on Regan/Bush deregulation, failure of the Kerry administration to adequately regulate the financial sector, or if Kerry would be blamed simply because he was in office. My guess would be a mixture of all three, in which case Huckabee's campaign for "Governor of America" would definitely appeal to workers in Michigan and Pennsylvania, while New Jersey's combo of blue collar workers and New York commuters could really send the state either way. My gut says NJ would stay in Kerry's column, but I have of course been wrong in the past, and will continue to be.

True, I also wonder how WA and OR would react in this scenario, as they were close for a very short amount of time in OTL.

I feel that Oregon and Washington's brief closeness in this election can be attributed to McCain's appeal to independents and his environmental record, both of which Huckabee lacks. These blue states go to Kerry.

I see, so, is there anything else needed to be discussed?

Well, if New Jersey does go to Huckabee, does Deleware?
Logged
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,294
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 11, 2008, 07:39:38 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.

True, it depends how truly sucky Kerry is. Also another question, if PA swings to Huckabee, is there a possibility that he also wins NJ? Those 2 states often vote the same way.

I suppose it's possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.

I know this friend from NJ called Uncle Mike, he says that wherever PA goes, NJ probably goes as well, he also said that was the same with NY, but with a lesser extent.

Well considering Michigan is going to Huckabee in this scenario, NJ would definitely be in contention. I think the real factor would be how the economic crisis would be perceived in this world, whether it would be blamed on Regan/Bush deregulation, failure of the Kerry administration to adequately regulate the financial sector, or if Kerry would be blamed simply because he was in office. My guess would be a mixture of all three, in which case Huckabee's campaign for "Governor of America" would definitely appeal to workers in Michigan and Pennsylvania, while New Jersey's combo of blue collar workers and New York commuters could really send the state either way. My gut says NJ would stay in Kerry's column, but I have of course been wrong in the past, and will continue to be.

True, I also wonder how WA and OR would react in this scenario, as they were close for a very short amount of time in OTL.

I feel that Oregon and Washington's brief closeness in this election can be attributed to McCain's appeal to independents and his environmental record, both of which Huckabee lacks. These blue states go to Kerry.

I see, so, is there anything else needed to be discussed?

Well, if New Jersey does go to Huckabee, does Deleware?

Maybe, but I am not completely sure. Are those 2 states similar in voting trend?
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 11, 2008, 07:56:19 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.

True, it depends how truly sucky Kerry is. Also another question, if PA swings to Huckabee, is there a possibility that he also wins NJ? Those 2 states often vote the same way.

I suppose it's possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.

I know this friend from NJ called Uncle Mike, he says that wherever PA goes, NJ probably goes as well, he also said that was the same with NY, but with a lesser extent.

Well considering Michigan is going to Huckabee in this scenario, NJ would definitely be in contention. I think the real factor would be how the economic crisis would be perceived in this world, whether it would be blamed on Regan/Bush deregulation, failure of the Kerry administration to adequately regulate the financial sector, or if Kerry would be blamed simply because he was in office. My guess would be a mixture of all three, in which case Huckabee's campaign for "Governor of America" would definitely appeal to workers in Michigan and Pennsylvania, while New Jersey's combo of blue collar workers and New York commuters could really send the state either way. My gut says NJ would stay in Kerry's column, but I have of course been wrong in the past, and will continue to be.

True, I also wonder how WA and OR would react in this scenario, as they were close for a very short amount of time in OTL.

I feel that Oregon and Washington's brief closeness in this election can be attributed to McCain's appeal to independents and his environmental record, both of which Huckabee lacks. These blue states go to Kerry.

I see, so, is there anything else needed to be discussed?

Well, if New Jersey does go to Huckabee, does Deleware?

Maybe, but I am not completely sure. Are those 2 states similar in voting trend?

They've voted together since 1980, and had similar percentages in '04. DE and PA have voted together since '72. I have no reason to believe DE would vote for Huckabee, simply conjecture.
Logged
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,294
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 11, 2008, 07:57:53 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.

True, it depends how truly sucky Kerry is. Also another question, if PA swings to Huckabee, is there a possibility that he also wins NJ? Those 2 states often vote the same way.

I suppose it's possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.

I know this friend from NJ called Uncle Mike, he says that wherever PA goes, NJ probably goes as well, he also said that was the same with NY, but with a lesser extent.

Well considering Michigan is going to Huckabee in this scenario, NJ would definitely be in contention. I think the real factor would be how the economic crisis would be perceived in this world, whether it would be blamed on Regan/Bush deregulation, failure of the Kerry administration to adequately regulate the financial sector, or if Kerry would be blamed simply because he was in office. My guess would be a mixture of all three, in which case Huckabee's campaign for "Governor of America" would definitely appeal to workers in Michigan and Pennsylvania, while New Jersey's combo of blue collar workers and New York commuters could really send the state either way. My gut says NJ would stay in Kerry's column, but I have of course been wrong in the past, and will continue to be.

True, I also wonder how WA and OR would react in this scenario, as they were close for a very short amount of time in OTL.

I feel that Oregon and Washington's brief closeness in this election can be attributed to McCain's appeal to independents and his environmental record, both of which Huckabee lacks. These blue states go to Kerry.

I see, so, is there anything else needed to be discussed?

Well, if New Jersey does go to Huckabee, does Deleware?

Maybe, but I am not completely sure. Are those 2 states similar in voting trend?

They've voted together since 1980, and had similar percentages in '04. DE and PA have voted together since '72. I have no reason to believe DE would vote for Huckabee, simply conjecture.

I guess that it is a good possibility then. What about Maryland?
Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,091


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 11, 2008, 08:12:22 PM »

rly? srsly?
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 11, 2008, 08:26:05 PM »



Something like that. Sounds like a pretty miserable first term for Kerry.

I would flip New Hampshire and Minnesota, but that's just me.

Minnesota should be fillped, but not New Hampshire, NH is too Libertine.

Generally I agree with you, the idea of NH voting for Huckabee is a stretch, but given the landslide proportions of this election, I think Huck would pull it out. Just my opinion.

True, it depends how truly sucky Kerry is. Also another question, if PA swings to Huckabee, is there a possibility that he also wins NJ? Those 2 states often vote the same way.

I suppose it's possible, but I wouldn't put money on it.

I know this friend from NJ called Uncle Mike, he says that wherever PA goes, NJ probably goes as well, he also said that was the same with NY, but with a lesser extent.

Well considering Michigan is going to Huckabee in this scenario, NJ would definitely be in contention. I think the real factor would be how the economic crisis would be perceived in this world, whether it would be blamed on Regan/Bush deregulation, failure of the Kerry administration to adequately regulate the financial sector, or if Kerry would be blamed simply because he was in office. My guess would be a mixture of all three, in which case Huckabee's campaign for "Governor of America" would definitely appeal to workers in Michigan and Pennsylvania, while New Jersey's combo of blue collar workers and New York commuters could really send the state either way. My gut says NJ would stay in Kerry's column, but I have of course been wrong in the past, and will continue to be.

True, I also wonder how WA and OR would react in this scenario, as they were close for a very short amount of time in OTL.

I feel that Oregon and Washington's brief closeness in this election can be attributed to McCain's appeal to independents and his environmental record, both of which Huckabee lacks. These blue states go to Kerry.

I see, so, is there anything else needed to be discussed?

Well, if New Jersey does go to Huckabee, does Deleware?

Maybe, but I am not completely sure. Are those 2 states similar in voting trend?

They've voted together since 1980, and had similar percentages in '04. DE and PA have voted together since '72. I have no reason to believe DE would vote for Huckabee, simply conjecture.

I guess that it is a good possibility then. What about Maryland?

I would put Maryland, Deleware, and New Jersey in Kerry's category... and in that order, if you catch my meaning.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.33 seconds with 12 queries.