Purple States
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:48:16 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Purple States
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Purple States  (Read 5355 times)
palinode
Rookie
**
Posts: 57
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 13, 2008, 01:57:33 AM »
« edited: November 13, 2008, 02:21:34 AM by palinode »

Barack Obama has re-created an old breed on the electoral map. Purple states are states with split electoral votes. Nebraska 2008: 4 electoral votes for McCain, 1 electoral vote for Obama. Current tally: 365-162. (Missouri hasn't been projected yet... still... The trifecta of indecision: Florida, Ohio, Missouri. So, what do you guys think? I call this a certain kind of "reaching across the aisle."
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,182
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2008, 11:53:35 AM »

Are they still counting votes in Missouri?
which votes? absentee? or other votes also?
in other words why hasn't it been projected into McCain's column?
interesting since it is the bellweather state.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2008, 12:10:17 PM »

Some networks have called MO for McCain. Others haven't. In any case, it seems extremely unlikely that Obama will win here. Claming MO had bellweather status was kind of ridiculous given recent elections. It was more Republican than the national popular vote in 2004, 2000 and 1996.
Logged
elcorazon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,402


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2008, 12:12:13 PM »

Barack Obama has re-created an old breed on the electoral map. Purple states are states with split electoral votes. Nebraska 2008: 4 electoral votes for McCain, 1 electoral vote for Obama. Current tally: 365-162. (Missouri hasn't been projected yet... still... The trifecta of indecision: Florida, Ohio, Missouri. So, what do you guys think? I call this a certain kind of "reaching across the aisle."
incomprehensible post
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,182
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2008, 12:20:43 PM »
« Edited: November 13, 2008, 12:29:28 PM by MacFarlan »

technically the second square should be red and not the third
This map shows results without percentages except for Missouri:

Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,182
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2008, 12:21:59 PM »

Missouri light blue to suggest it is so close not to suggest a certain percent (i.e. 30%)
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,182
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2008, 12:33:48 PM »

Actually, even better:

Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2008, 12:35:41 PM »

That's ugly.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,182
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2008, 01:30:16 PM »

maybe so, but it is the way elections are talked about nowadays
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 13, 2008, 05:30:20 PM »


Doesn't make it better.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 13, 2008, 05:38:58 PM »


Disgusting. Remove that disgrace immediately.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,358
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2008, 09:58:16 AM »

That's beautiful. I so wish this site would switch to the colors everybody else uses now. It's especially confusing when you look at past elections.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2008, 10:30:03 AM »

That's beautiful. I so wish this site would switch to the colors everybody else uses now. It's especially confusing when you look at past elections.

Go away, heathen.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2008, 12:36:09 PM »

It looks really, really weird and that's nothing to do with my Atlasian parochial pride in our use of the other scheme. It probably wouldn't look nearly as bad with other shades of red and blue, or simply in the shaded version.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,358
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2008, 01:51:16 PM »

Theoretically, that could have been the actual map you know.

It very well could be the actually map in the future, as Republican and Democratic strongholds have switched in the past and could again at some point.

You're just not used to seeing it that way.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2008, 02:16:41 PM »

Theoretically, that could have been the actual map you know.
I'm well aware of that.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Nope, that's not it.
I'll tell you what it is - the blue, on these purely 50 shades maps in the Atlas color scheme, looks sort of like it's "behing" the red. Which is more apparent when it's not in the center of the map, and looks especially strange around Colorado and New Mexico.
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,344
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2008, 04:39:08 PM »

Tories are in blue, the UMP is in blue....
Aren't Canada's conservatives and Australia's National Party in blue ?
CDU-CSU is in black (a dark blue, sort of...).

Do US MSM even know why they have chosen red for GOP and blue for Dems ?
Because of rednecks ?
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2008, 06:10:37 PM »

Tories are in blue, the UMP is in blue....
Aren't Canada's conservatives and Australia's National Party in blue ?
CDU-CSU is in black (a dark blue, sort of...).

Do US MSM even know why they have chosen red for GOP and blue for Dems ?
Because of rednecks ?

Because the United States needs to do everything strangely.

Actually, the CDU uses black and the CSU blue, and the Australian Liberals (the right-wing party) are blue, not the Nationals.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,358
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2008, 07:03:57 PM »

Do US MSM even know why they have chosen red for GOP and blue for Dems ?
Because of rednecks ?

The colors have varied in the past and even been the opposite before. The choice was random and stuck because of the recount stuff in 2000. It's not going to go away now. It's ingrained. We may as well adapt.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 14, 2008, 07:40:30 PM »

Tories are in blue, the UMP is in blue....
Aren't Canada's conservatives and Australia's National Party in blue ?
CDU-CSU is in black (a dark blue, sort of...).

Do US MSM even know why they have chosen red for GOP and blue for Dems ?
Because of rednecks ?

Because the United States needs to do everything strangely.

Actually, the CDU uses black and the CSU blue, and the Australian Liberals (the right-wing party) are blue, not the Nationals.

Nats use darker greener that many often confuse with the Greenies. SaskParty uses green too.
Logged
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,294
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 14, 2008, 07:41:48 PM »

Tories are in blue, the UMP is in blue....
Aren't Canada's conservatives and Australia's National Party in blue ?
CDU-CSU is in black (a dark blue, sort of...).

Do US MSM even know why they have chosen red for GOP and blue for Dems ?
Because of rednecks ?

Because the United States needs to do everything strangely.

Actually, the CDU uses black and the CSU blue, and the Australian Liberals (the right-wing party) are blue, not the Nationals.

Are the CDU Anarchists or Fascists then?
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 14, 2008, 07:48:02 PM »

Tories are in blue, the UMP is in blue....
Aren't Canada's conservatives and Australia's National Party in blue ?
CDU-CSU is in black (a dark blue, sort of...).

Do US MSM even know why they have chosen red for GOP and blue for Dems ?
Because of rednecks ?

Because the United States needs to do everything strangely.

Actually, the CDU uses black and the CSU blue, and the Australian Liberals (the right-wing party) are blue, not the Nationals.

Are the CDU Anarchists or Fascists then?

LOL
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 15, 2008, 05:19:42 AM »

Tories are in blue, the UMP is in blue....
Aren't Canada's conservatives and Australia's National Party in blue ?
CDU-CSU is in black (a dark blue, sort of...).

Do US MSM even know why they have chosen red for GOP and blue for Dems ?
Because of rednecks ?

Because the United States needs to do everything strangely.

Actually, the CDU uses black and the CSU blue, and the Australian Liberals (the right-wing party) are blue, not the Nationals.

Are the CDU Anarchists or Fascists then?
Black in Germany was traditionally the color of political catholicism.

Although the ÖVP embraces black, the CDU and CSU have always had slight hangups about it. The term's ingrained in popular usage though (although maps more typically use blue - understandably given that black's not shadeable.)
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 15, 2008, 05:28:47 AM »

That's beautiful. I so wish this site would switch to the colors everybody else uses now. It's especially confusing when you look at past elections.

You are immoral.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 17, 2008, 11:17:52 AM »

Yeah. You are going to hell.

Just because everyone else does it, doesn't make it right. Like being an Epee fencer, for example.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 12 queries.