Can Obama "connect" his states?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 08:17:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Can Obama "connect" his states?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: except for Hawaii of course
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
#3
all other answers
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 11

Author Topic: Can Obama "connect" his states?  (Read 3012 times)
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,183
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 13, 2008, 12:49:57 PM »

if he adds AZ, GA, & NE the third being the most difficult all his states will connect.
if you add SC and look at NE as a bridge since it two colors all the red states and all the blue states connect
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,183
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2008, 12:54:01 PM »

Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,183
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2008, 12:58:39 PM »

Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2008, 01:09:54 PM »

1.) both maps are utterly crazy and absurd

2.) why does he need South Carolina in the first map?
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,183
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2008, 01:18:56 PM »

1.) both maps are utterly crazy and absurd

2.) why does he need South Carolina in the first map?

He doesn't need SC, but if he were to win then all the Republican states would connect also

You can say they are crazy and absurd... can you be specific as to why on the first map?
They aren't predictions so much as hypothetical 'what ifs'... 2012 is still a long way off.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,170
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2008, 01:20:53 PM »

To do so, he would have to either take Nebraska or crack the Mormon Belt, so no. The Mormon Belt is actually more likely, if Republicans nominate an openly Mormonphobic Evangelical.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,183
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2008, 01:24:09 PM »

To do so, he would have to either take Nebraska or crack the Mormon Belt, so no. The Mormon Belt is actually more likely, if Republicans nominate an openly Mormonphobic Evangelical.

Well, how do you color a state that is not one color or the other...Nebraska is not and in 08 was not a winner take all state
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,183
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2008, 01:25:52 PM »

what is wrong with the second map, btw?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2008, 01:51:56 PM »

what is wrong with the second map, btw?

Why on Earth would he win Arizona and lose New Mexico?

not to mention Nebraska being a toss-up...

and Indiana staying democratic while North Carolina and Virginia shift back....extremely unlikely, I believe.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 13, 2008, 02:54:39 PM »

What about KS-MO? As likely as Nebraska I think though that's really not saying anything.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 13, 2008, 05:31:07 PM »

I think Texas-Arkansas-Missouri is more likely than using Nebraska or Kansas...
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 13, 2008, 05:43:15 PM »

I think Texas-Arkansas-Missouri is more likely than using Nebraska or Kansas...
Nah. Obama ain't never winning Arkansas.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 13, 2008, 06:05:34 PM »

Actually: Correction, Obama's most likely way to connect would be to win ND, MN, AZ, and GA.


Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 13, 2008, 06:17:19 PM »

Actually: Correction, Obama's most likely way to connect would be to win ND, MN, AZ, and GA.




how would that be connected?
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 13, 2008, 06:18:04 PM »

To do so, he would have to either take Nebraska or crack the Mormon Belt, so no. The Mormon Belt is actually more likely, if Republicans nominate an openly Mormonphobic Evangelical.

Well, how do you color a state that is not one color or the other...Nebraska is not and in 08 was not a winner take all state

I color Omaha red and the rest of the state blue...so Obama has a foothold on the other side of the Missouri, and is nowhere near Colorado.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2008, 06:20:24 PM »

Actually: Correction, Obama's most likely way to connect would be to win ND, MN, AZ, and GA.




how would that be connected?

Ooops, damn you Idaho!
Logged
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 13, 2008, 07:17:36 PM »

Nein. Idaho, Wyoming, most of Nebraska, and Kansas will remain Republican walls, barring a true landslide.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.