Should "judicial review" be abolished?

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Absolutely not.

It is one of the fundamental protections against majority abuse of power. There should always be a fundamental objectivity to law. Judicial review protects against dictation by the majority.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Never quite sure what to think about this issue, really. A limited amount of judicial review is probably a good thing, but where do you draw the line?

Judicial review protects against dictation by the majority.

...imposing, instead, dictation by unaccountable minorities...

I think the risk of that is lesser in places where there isn't a direct connection between the judiciary and politics. I mean the idea of electing judges is horrific to me.