Should "judicial review" be abolished? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 09:37:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Should "judicial review" be abolished? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should "judicial review," in the form of binding court pronouncements on the constitutionality of legislation, be done away with?
#1
Yes		  
#2
No		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Should "judicial review" be abolished?  (Read 11945 times)
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


« on: May 11, 2009, 03:09:32 AM »
No.
What should be done is to find a way consistent with federalism to make the federal judiciary elected.

This is easy to do for district courts, but less easy for upper courts. I'd like to hear some suggestions.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.