Should "judicial review" be abolished? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:49:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Should "judicial review" be abolished? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should "judicial review," in the form of binding court pronouncements on the constitutionality of legislation, be done away with?
#1
Yes		  
#2
No		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Should "judicial review" be abolished?  (Read 11979 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,723
United Kingdom


« on: November 27, 2008, 11:57:58 AM »
« edited: November 27, 2008, 12:00:58 PM by Sibboleth »
Never quite sure what to think about this issue, really. A limited amount of judicial review is probably a good thing, but where do you draw the line?

Quote from: Fmr Gov. Polnut on November 27, 2008, 06:28:40 AM
Judicial review protects against dictation by the majority.

...imposing, instead, dictation by unaccountable minorities...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 15 queries.