If Obama Had Picked Hillary Clinton
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 03:52:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  If Obama Had Picked Hillary Clinton
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If Obama Had Picked Hillary Clinton  (Read 3003 times)
humder
Rookie
**
Posts: 223


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 14, 2008, 10:00:27 AM »

 If Obama had picked Hillary Clinton for his running mate, how do you think the results would have been different.
 
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2008, 10:07:12 AM »

Hmm.

Maybe he would have won MO, but lost IN & NC ...
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2008, 04:00:05 PM »

Hmm.

Maybe he would have won MO, but lost IN & NC ...

This, and he'd have come within five in Arkansas. It's probably for the better he didn't.
Logged
humder
Rookie
**
Posts: 223


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2008, 04:06:09 PM »

 Do you really think she could have lost Obama states? I'm not sure if people in Indiana and North Carolina are that anti-Clinton.
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2008, 04:08:04 PM »

Do you really think she could have lost Obama states? I'm not sure if people in Indiana and North Carolina are that anti-Clinton.

It's not so much that they're anti-Clinton as it is that Obama attracted a certain type of Republican: socially moderate, fiscally responsible Republicans in the Midwest and Upper South who, while 'traditionalist' in a vague sense, feel alienated by the rightward lurch of the G.O.P. on social policy. Picking a Clinton may have undermined his perceived earnestness towards this group.
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2008, 04:47:53 PM »

Same results, but doing a little better in the apps.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,168
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 14, 2008, 06:52:35 PM »

Do you really think she could have lost Obama states? I'm not sure if people in Indiana and North Carolina are that anti-Clinton.

It's not so much that they're anti-Clinton as it is that Obama attracted a certain type of Republican: socially moderate, fiscally responsible Republicans in the Midwest and Upper South who, while 'traditionalist' in a vague sense, feel alienated by the rightward lurch of the G.O.P. on social policy. Picking a Clinton may have undermined his perceived earnestness towards this group.

true. For the same reason he might have done a point or two worse in Colorado, Nevada, and New Mexico, but ultimately still would have won those states
Logged
panda_priest
Rookie
**
Posts: 98
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 14, 2008, 10:11:41 PM »

He might has well have picked her now that she's in his adminstration.
Logged
Nixon in '80
nixon1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,308
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2008, 01:12:42 AM »

He might has well have picked her now that she's in his adminstration.

...except if he dies/resigns, she won't become President... big difference.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 15, 2008, 02:47:33 AM »

He might has well have picked her now that she's in his adminstration.

...except if he dies/resigns, she won't become President... big difference.

Also, he didn't have to run with her for 3 months.  If people grumbled about how choosing Biden wasn't exactly "change worthy" just think about what people would have said about Clinton.  I think having Clinton as the VP would have made more Obama supporters angry than Clinton supporters happy.  The net result would have been a closer election IMO.  I don't think having Clinton on the ticket would have done Obama any favors.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 15, 2008, 03:14:45 AM »

He would've been able to win women, Jews and Hispanics.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,634
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2008, 06:36:45 AM »

It would have been a bad idea, even though Clinton is one of my favorite politicians, because of two things:

1.Hillary, who will (i think) turn 70 in 2016, would probably still be scheming for 2012 and might try to ruin the election for him.

2.Given her ambitious nature, once Obama is in office he might end up like Vince Foster.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,519


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 15, 2008, 01:28:16 PM »

Roll Eyes why does everybody think Clinton would have hurt obama when exit polls showed her winning by 10+ points over mclame
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 15, 2008, 01:29:32 PM »

Roll Eyes why does everybody think Clinton would have hurt obama when exit polls showed her winning by 10+ points over mclame

I honestly think there's a difference between being on the top or the bottom of the ticket.

Hillary may have (probably) performed better as the actual candidate, but I think she might indeed have been a liability in Obama v. Mac as VP nominee.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,519


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 15, 2008, 02:55:19 PM »

Roll Eyes why does everybody think Clinton would have hurt obama when exit polls showed her winning by 10+ points over mclame

I honestly think there's a difference between being on the top or the bottom of the ticket.

Hillary may have (probably) performed better as the actual candidate, but I think she might indeed have been a liability in Obama v. Mac as VP nominee.


What would you have thought of a Hillary-Obama ticket?

I would have loved it! But I am not sure how it would have done. However Clinton would have almost had to chose Obama as her running mate if she won the nomination.

However, I doubt there would have been an anti-clinton rebellion in Indiana if it were Obama-Hillary..
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 15, 2008, 03:00:38 PM »
« Edited: December 15, 2008, 03:02:19 PM by Einzige »

However, I doubt there would have been an anti-clinton rebellion in Indiana if it were Obama-Hillary..

You have to realize that there is a very large, very vocal contingent of right-wingers of an intellectually inferior caliber who have been groomed for a decade and a half to await the day that Hillary stepped into the role of Democratic nominee for President. Entire books have been written on and about the subject; all of this nonsense regarding her role in nontroversies like Whitewater and Vince Foster's suicide was a long-winded dog-whistle for that day.

For this reason, among others, Hillary has a definite 'ceiling' of support, with passionate zealots on both sides. Obama had a great advantage over her in that respect; few knew who he was prior to his Iowa victory, and the right-wing machine had less than a year to nail him with something that would stick to him the way those faux-scandals did to Hillary.

(That said, of course, I personally despise the woman for very different reasons - she's a half-hearted triangulator par excellence; she, like Bill, has utterly no principles.)
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,519


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 15, 2008, 03:04:09 PM »

However, I doubt there would have been an anti-clinton rebellion in Indiana if it were Obama-Hillary..

You have to realize that there is a very large, very vocal contingent of right-wingers of an intellectually inferior caliber who have been groomed for a decade and a half to await the day that Hillary stepped into the role of Democratic nominee for President. Entire books have been written on and about the subject; all of this nonsense regarding her role in nontroversies like Whitewater and Vince Foster's suicide was a long-winded dog-whistle for that day.

For this reason, among others, Hillary has a definite 'ceiling' of support, with passionate zealots on both sides. Obama had a great advantage over her in that respect; few knew who he was prior to his Iowa victory, and the right-wing machine had less than a year to nail him with something that would stick to him the way those faux-scandals did to Hillary.

(That said, of course, I personally despise the woman for very different reasons - she's a half-hearted triangulator par excellence; she, like Bill, has utterly no principles.)

While the far right wing hates her as much, and probably more, as ever; overall her perception among moderate conservatives is much higher today then it was before this year.
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 15, 2008, 03:06:12 PM »

While the far right wing hates her as much, and probably more, as ever; overall her perception among moderate conservatives is much higher today then it was before this year.

Of course, because they're either just as lacking in any real principle as she is or they're too stupid to realize that she intentionally ran to the (far) right of Obama in the primaries to pull in the "'Scoop' Jackson" Democrats to her camp. If they're dumb enough to fall for her incessant triangulation, though, maybe we can make leftists out of them yet.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 12 queries.