Dems embrace dynasty politics
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 06:38:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Dems embrace dynasty politics
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Dems embrace dynasty politics  (Read 19608 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,802


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 17, 2008, 06:12:29 PM »

Barack Obama's path to the presidency included beating what had been one of the nation's most powerful families. But, in an unusual twist, his election last month is helping accelerate the trend toward dynasty politics.

His secretary of state will be Hillary Clinton, the wife of the former president. The Senate seat she’ll vacate is being pursued by Caroline Kennedy, the daughter of a president and the niece of two senators. Joe Biden’s Senate seat may go to his son Beau. Colorado Sen. Ken Salazar, Obama’s pick for interior secretary, could end up being replaced by his brother, Rep. John Salazar.

And Obama’s own seat could go to the son of the Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. – less likely now in light of developments in the Rod Blagojevich scandal – or to the daughter of Illinois’ current House speaker.

The U.S. Senate could end up looking like an American version of the House of Lords – and Republicans have begun to take notice.

“Democrats seem to lack a common man who can just win a good, old-fashioned election,” said Rep. Tom Reynolds (R-N.Y.), the former chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee. “They’ve got seat-warmers, seat-sellers and the making of pillows for the seats of royalty. No wonder the public wonders what’s going on in Washington.”

While Obama’s election and subsequent Cabinet appointments may have accelerated the trend toward dynasty, he’s hardly responsible for it. There is a rich bipartisan history of dynasty in American politics that dates all the way back to the Founding Fathers; Obama-Biden actually represents the first winning ticket since 1976 without a son or a grandson of a U.S. senator on it.

In 2008, the storied Udall clan, sometimes referred to as the Western Kennedys, saw two members elected to the Senate— Mark from Colorado and Tom from New Mexico. In 2010, they could be joined in the Senate by Florida’s Jeb Bush, the son and brother of presidents and the grandson of a senator.

All told, it’s entirely possible that the Senate will be comprised of nearly a dozen congressional offspring by the end of Obama’s first term as president.

“It’s a very interesting American phenomenon, even though there is a line in the Constitution that says no title of nobility may be granted by the United States,” says Stephen Hess, a senior fellow emeritus at the Brookings Institution and the author of “America’s Political Dynasties.” “Given where we started, it’s interesting that this has developed.”

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16664.html
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,719
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2008, 06:22:17 PM »

From the people who brought you "No Southerners in Obama's Cabinet" bring you...
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2008, 06:22:56 PM »

I have no problem with political dynasties.  If they are competent, then they should serve.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2008, 06:24:21 PM »

I have no problem with political dynasties.  If they are competent, then they should serve.

Political dynasties are inherently incompetent.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,802


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2008, 06:24:37 PM »

I have no problem with political dynasties.  If they are competent, then they should serve.

Like Bush was competent? Without dynasty we would probably be coming off 8 years of President McCain. That in itself should be enough to say that political dynasties have cost this country more than they are worth.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2008, 06:26:11 PM »

Kind of funny that the country voted in two Democratic Udalls but voted out the Republican Udall this year.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2008, 06:26:26 PM »

I have no problem with political dynasties.  If they are competent, then they should serve.

Political dynasties are inherently incompetent.

Not always.  Bush is just one example; the Udalls have been competent, for example.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,802


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2008, 06:27:48 PM »

I have no problem with political dynasties.  If they are competent, then they should serve.

Political dynasties are inherently incompetent.

Not always.  Bush is just one example; the Udalls have been competent, for example.

Oh sure dynasties can produce competent people, but so can families that have never had political officers serving in previous generations. Dynasty distorts the process in favor of those families even if someone else is more competent. That is the point. It's effect is inherently beneficial towards incompetence.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 17, 2008, 06:31:23 PM »

I oppose dynastic politics.
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 17, 2008, 06:40:09 PM »

I have a problem with dynastic appointments (ex: Caroline Kennedy), moreso than dynastic electoral victories (ex: the Udalls).  If they're elected then the onus is on the people to have made the right choice.
Logged
LanceMcSteel
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 357


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 17, 2008, 06:41:24 PM »

Democratic Dynaties:

Kennedy's
Clinton's
Udall's

Republican Dynasites:

Dole's
Bush's

I'm sensing a pattern here.

General incompetence among the Republican party extends to their dynasties, while the Democratic dynaties have been quite effective.
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 17, 2008, 06:43:39 PM »
« Edited: December 17, 2008, 06:45:35 PM by paul718 »

Democratic Dynaties:

Kennedy's
Clinton's
Udall's

Republican Dynasites:

Dole's
Bush's

I'm sensing a pattern here.

General incompetence among the Republican party extends to their dynasties, while the Democratic dynaties have been quite effective.

There is a Bush dynasty and a Kennedy dynasty.  The others are not dynasties.

Edit:  The Udalls too, but as was mentioned earlier, Gordon Smith is a Republican.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 17, 2008, 07:23:14 PM »

Edit:  The Udalls too, but as was mentioned earlier, Gordon Smith is a Republican.

The presence of a D-WV doesn't make the Rockefellers any less Republican, does it?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 17, 2008, 07:30:51 PM »

They always have and always will.

Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 17, 2008, 07:40:17 PM »



Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 17, 2008, 09:16:43 PM »

how are the Clintons a 'dynasty'?  they are one generation, and probably won't extend beyond that.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 17, 2008, 09:46:56 PM »


The love affair with and domination of the Kennedy family doesn't even begin to compare to the Bush family.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 17, 2008, 09:52:08 PM »

Barack Obama's path to the presidency included beating what had been one of the nation's most powerful families. But, in an unusual twist, his election last month is helping accelerate the trend toward dynasty politics.

You're watching too much cable TV news.  Seriously.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 17, 2008, 10:02:48 PM »

I can see Chelsea jumping in when she gets a little older. She has proven pretty adept at campaigning for her mother and popular with voters.

that's still theoretical, and I personally don't think she's ever going to run for anything, but neither of us can be correct, obviously
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 17, 2008, 10:24:13 PM »


Dynasties have been good (see: Roosevelts, Clintons, Kennedys) and bad (see: Bushes, Doles).


How are the Doles a political dynasty?  Isn't it just Bob and Elizabeth?  And how are they "bad"?
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 17, 2008, 10:30:40 PM »

Both parties have lots of political families. Regrettable, for sure, but in no way limited to either party.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 17, 2008, 10:31:06 PM »


The love affair with and domination of the Kennedy family doesn't even begin to compare to the Bush family.
Total years spent in the White House by a guy with Kennedy for his last name: 3
Total years spent in the White House by a guy with Bush for his late name: 12
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 17, 2008, 10:32:12 PM »


The love affair with and domination of the Kennedy family doesn't even begin to compare to the Bush family.
Total years spent in the White House by a guy with Kennedy for his last name: 3
Total years spent in the White House by a guy with Bush for his late name: 12

1) That doesn't negate anything that I said.
2) Total years in the White House isn't the only criteria for being a dynasty.
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 17, 2008, 10:35:53 PM »

how are the Clintons a 'dynasty'?  they are one generation, and probably won't extend beyond that.

I hope not. The very thought of Chelsea Clinton of entering politics, in particular doing a Caroline Kennedy, which is her most likely route into the wonderful world of politics is one of repulsion.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 17, 2008, 11:02:32 PM »

Edit:  The Udalls too, but as was mentioned earlier, Gordon Smith is a Republican.

The presence of a D-WV doesn't make the Rockefellers any less Republican, does it?

Oh yes, the Rockefeller political family as well. Jay Rockefeller (senator from WV), Nelson Rockefeller (vice president under Ford), Winthrop Paul Rockefeller (lieutenant governor of AR under Huckabee), and plenty of others.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 14 queries.