Dems embrace dynasty politics (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:10:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Dems embrace dynasty politics (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Dems embrace dynasty politics  (Read 19742 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,916


« on: December 17, 2008, 06:12:29 PM »

Barack Obama's path to the presidency included beating what had been one of the nation's most powerful families. But, in an unusual twist, his election last month is helping accelerate the trend toward dynasty politics.

His secretary of state will be Hillary Clinton, the wife of the former president. The Senate seat she’ll vacate is being pursued by Caroline Kennedy, the daughter of a president and the niece of two senators. Joe Biden’s Senate seat may go to his son Beau. Colorado Sen. Ken Salazar, Obama’s pick for interior secretary, could end up being replaced by his brother, Rep. John Salazar.

And Obama’s own seat could go to the son of the Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. – less likely now in light of developments in the Rod Blagojevich scandal – or to the daughter of Illinois’ current House speaker.

The U.S. Senate could end up looking like an American version of the House of Lords – and Republicans have begun to take notice.

“Democrats seem to lack a common man who can just win a good, old-fashioned election,” said Rep. Tom Reynolds (R-N.Y.), the former chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee. “They’ve got seat-warmers, seat-sellers and the making of pillows for the seats of royalty. No wonder the public wonders what’s going on in Washington.”

While Obama’s election and subsequent Cabinet appointments may have accelerated the trend toward dynasty, he’s hardly responsible for it. There is a rich bipartisan history of dynasty in American politics that dates all the way back to the Founding Fathers; Obama-Biden actually represents the first winning ticket since 1976 without a son or a grandson of a U.S. senator on it.

In 2008, the storied Udall clan, sometimes referred to as the Western Kennedys, saw two members elected to the Senate— Mark from Colorado and Tom from New Mexico. In 2010, they could be joined in the Senate by Florida’s Jeb Bush, the son and brother of presidents and the grandson of a senator.

All told, it’s entirely possible that the Senate will be comprised of nearly a dozen congressional offspring by the end of Obama’s first term as president.

“It’s a very interesting American phenomenon, even though there is a line in the Constitution that says no title of nobility may be granted by the United States,” says Stephen Hess, a senior fellow emeritus at the Brookings Institution and the author of “America’s Political Dynasties.” “Given where we started, it’s interesting that this has developed.”

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16664.html
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,916


« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2008, 06:24:37 PM »

I have no problem with political dynasties.  If they are competent, then they should serve.

Like Bush was competent? Without dynasty we would probably be coming off 8 years of President McCain. That in itself should be enough to say that political dynasties have cost this country more than they are worth.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,916


« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2008, 06:27:48 PM »

I have no problem with political dynasties.  If they are competent, then they should serve.

Political dynasties are inherently incompetent.

Not always.  Bush is just one example; the Udalls have been competent, for example.

Oh sure dynasties can produce competent people, but so can families that have never had political officers serving in previous generations. Dynasty distorts the process in favor of those families even if someone else is more competent. That is the point. It's effect is inherently beneficial towards incompetence.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,916


« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2008, 12:08:44 AM »

At least Obama himself is the exact opposite of a political dynasty or royalty (well, at least about as close to it as anyone can be and still be elected President realistically).

He was groomed by chief of staff to Tom Daschle, who was one of the top players in the Senate, from his first day. He might not be political dynasty, but Al is right in that he doesn't match in his socio-economic status with any disadvantaged group, minority or not. He is a Harvard-educated, Hyde Park-supported candidate who was always sponsored by someone higher than him to feed his large ambitions.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.