Opinion of Canadian "Equalization Payments"
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 01:16:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Opinion of Canadian "Equalization Payments"
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Opinion of Canadian "Equalization Payments"  (Read 2480 times)
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 20, 2008, 04:15:43 PM »
« edited: December 20, 2008, 04:19:42 PM by Supersoulty »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equalization_Payments#Canada

When I first heard about these, I actually thought they were a joke used to make fun of the Quebecois... I couldn't believe this was for real.  So basically, three of the provinces pay for all the other ones.  Great system... if you happen to live in a "distinct society".
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2008, 05:47:31 PM »

A very similar system called the "Länderfinanzausgleich" exists in Germany.

Rich states "donate" a share of their tax Euros to struggling states.

5 states wind up paying for the other 11.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2008, 05:53:12 PM »

What would happen if this were implemented in the US?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2008, 05:55:18 PM »

What would happen if this were implemented in the US?

civil war
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2008, 05:56:45 PM »

Ted Stevens and Robert Byrd approve.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2008, 05:56:54 PM »

We have states that pay $1.40 for every dollar they get back from the feds already. Why would equalization payments caused civil war?
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2008, 05:58:30 PM »

Newfies needed them, now Ontario needs them. Grin
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2008, 06:00:43 PM »

We have states that pay $1.40 for every dollar they get back from the feds already. Why would equalization payments caused civil war?

civil war was more of a joke...

But believe me, there would be a big uproar if any direct system of redistribution were implemented. Most people are simply too lazy to think about exactly where their tax dollars go right now. And of course...the whole concept of redistribution seems "un-American" Smiley
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 20, 2008, 06:01:40 PM »

Populism is in style right now, Franzl so it could be sold as an anti-recessionary measure. I'm not advocating it, just seeing how badly it'd muck up things.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,712
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2008, 06:02:48 PM »

Similar systems exist in most democracies and I'd argue that American politics would be a lot less corrupt if a formal system of regional redistribution existed there as well.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 20, 2008, 06:03:16 PM »

I'm curious. Why would formal regional redistribution make things less corrupt?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,712
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 20, 2008, 06:06:10 PM »

I'm curious. Why would formal regional redistribution make things less corrupt?

You know how things work at the moment, don't you?
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 20, 2008, 06:06:59 PM »

And even with formal redistribution payments how do you plan on stopping them from voting for pork anyways?
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 20, 2008, 06:34:20 PM »
« Edited: December 20, 2008, 06:36:40 PM by Supersoulty »

We have states that pay $1.40 for every dollar they get back from the feds already. Why would equalization payments caused civil war?

Equalization payments are handed out for the expressed purpose of aiding "less fortunate" provinces, and maintaining "distinct societies, not just in Quebec, but also in the Maritime Provinces, is often used as justification for doing it (We can't make these people move, their lifestyle would be lost forever!).  It would be almost as if we actually paid people to stay in Appalachia so that that way of life could be preserved.

The Federal monies in the U.S. are structured totally differently and just usually end up benefiting certain states accidentally (there just so happens to be more poverty, or more need for highway funds).

The irony is that Canada is supposed to be a Confederation.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 20, 2008, 06:41:40 PM »

Actually, in a way, Canada is still a Confederation, but a kinda Reverse Confederation.  The weaker provinces welch off the stronger ones, and in turn have zero responsibility to the rest of the country, because they are distinct provinces in a joke of a non-federal system.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,625
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 22, 2008, 11:42:37 PM »

Actually, in a way, Canada is still a Confederation, but a kinda Reverse Confederation.  The weaker provinces welch off the stronger ones, and in turn have zero responsibility to the rest of the country, because they are distinct provinces in a joke of a non-federal system.

Much of our Confederation is a joke. We have a constitution who is not signed by all the provinces.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 23, 2008, 12:04:39 AM »

Actually, in a way, Canada is still a Confederation, but a kinda Reverse Confederation.  The weaker provinces welch off the stronger ones, and in turn have zero responsibility to the rest of the country, because they are distinct provinces in a joke of a non-federal system.

Much of our Confederation is a joke. We have a constitution who is not signed by all the provinces.

pffft; Quebec doesn't count Wink
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,625
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 23, 2008, 03:03:54 AM »

Actually, in a way, Canada is still a Confederation, but a kinda Reverse Confederation.  The weaker provinces welch off the stronger ones, and in turn have zero responsibility to the rest of the country, because they are distinct provinces in a joke of a non-federal system.

Much of our Confederation is a joke. We have a constitution who is not signed by all the provinces.

pffft; Quebec doesn't count Wink

We are around 20% of Canada population. I know than they don't vote the good way, but I sense an improvement for that.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 23, 2008, 04:09:42 AM »

On the surface it seems ridiculous, but any grouping must have means to preserve unity if that grouping is worthwhile to all parties.

South Carolina might never have seceded if Massachusetts were writing it's legislature a check every month. Smiley
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 23, 2008, 03:08:45 PM »

Canada was designed from the start to be more centralized than the United States. The Fathers of Confederation gave everything they considered important to the federal government and left the unimportant things to the provinces. They were designed to be more or less equivalent to counties, not states.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 23, 2008, 03:39:03 PM »

Canada was designed from the start to be more centralized than the United States. The Fathers of Confederation gave everything they considered important to the federal government and left the unimportant things to the provinces. They were designed to be more or less equivalent to counties, not states.

Little did they know, education and health care would be as important as they are now Cheesy.
They wanted a centralized country to avoid what they saw in the U.S. with the civil war.
Logged
Jacobtm
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,216


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 23, 2008, 10:52:05 PM »

It's Canada, who's surprised?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,734


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 23, 2008, 11:00:47 PM »

In the US, the federal government happily gives California only 80 cents back on the dollar of taxes while the state of California is running a $40 billion deficit, and has the 3rd highest unemployment rate.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 23, 2008, 11:40:44 PM »

No, it's your guys fault for all the propositions that mandate spending but don't say a word about where to get it from.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 23, 2008, 11:42:04 PM »

Let's not forget mass immigration whether illegal or legal causing massive strains on social services while we're at it.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 11 queries.