President Forever results thread...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 18, 2024, 09:12:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Election and History Games (Moderator: Dereich)
  President Forever results thread...
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 ... 130
Author Topic: President Forever results thread...  (Read 876993 times)
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2300 on: November 10, 2010, 04:30:47 PM »
« edited: November 10, 2010, 04:44:53 PM by Jbrase »

1960: I played as Kennedy. I won 340 - 169



I had a healthy lead for the last half if the game leading about 46%-40%-.8% Nixon ended up winning most the undecideds on election night and came close to sweeping the south, luckily I held on to the deep south. Nixon won big in the plains states and the mountain west. 
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2301 on: November 12, 2010, 03:59:46 PM »

1860: I played as Sam Houston



Sewerd (R): PV - 30%; EV - 131
Houston (CU)Sad PV - 35%; EV - 114
Breckenridge (SD): PV - 22%; EV - 56
Douglas (D) - PV - 13%
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2302 on: November 13, 2010, 10:30:37 AM »

1860: I played as Sam Houston



Sewerd (R): PV - 30%; EV - 131
Houston (CU)Sad PV - 35%; EV - 114
Breckenridge (SD): PV - 22%; EV - 56
Douglas (D) - PV - 13%

This a scenario for the 2008 version? Where can I get it? Smiley
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2303 on: November 14, 2010, 01:45:56 AM »

1860: I played as Sam Houston



Sewerd (R): PV - 30%; EV - 131
Houston (CU)Sad PV - 35%; EV - 114
Breckenridge (SD): PV - 22%; EV - 56
Douglas (D) - PV - 13%

This a scenario for the 2008 version? Where can I get it? Smiley

The Theory sparks scenarios site
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2304 on: November 14, 2010, 02:23:13 AM »

1860: I played as Sam Houston



Sewerd (R): PV - 30%; EV - 131
Houston (CU)Sad PV - 35%; EV - 114
Breckenridge (SD): PV - 22%; EV - 56
Douglas (D) - PV - 13%

The scenario is very flawed. If you have Campaigns Forever you can edit it, but the author needs to re-edit the scenario.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2305 on: November 14, 2010, 10:06:51 PM »

My running in 2008 as an Independent, even though my weighted positions were 3.0 to Obama's 2.8 - I seemed to do more damage to McCain early on, and eventually started to take voters from both sides... please note I gave myself a LOT of money.



Obama/Biden - 322EV - 39.4% (Best state (not DC) - MA, 63.4%/ Worst state - WY, 20.7%)
McCain/Palin - 216EV - 37.6% (Best state - AL, 55.4%/ Worst state - HI, 16%)
Polnut/Hagel - 0EV - 22.1% (Best state - CT/NH, 32.3% / Worst state (that I was on the ballot) - AL, 14%)
Logged
MorningInAmerica
polijunkie3057
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 779
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2306 on: November 16, 2010, 06:08:46 PM »

An interesting little scenario involving Obama, Romney, and Bloomberg. Bloomberg proves to be a strong 3rd party challenger, despite not winning any states.


Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2307 on: November 19, 2010, 06:51:12 PM »

I created a new 2004 scenario where Dean runs as Independent after losing in the primaries. Once I began to rise in the polls the Map became almost all blue for a while until Edwards imploded. I was slightly behind Bush until the west coast began reporting results where I finnaly overtook bush in the PV and EV but was still short of the 270. Then a last minute upset of Edwards in Oregon put me over the top.



Howard Dean/Matt Gonzalez (I/G): PV - 36.2%; EV 271
Bush/Cheney (R): PV - 33.6%; EV - 248
Edwards/Richardson (D): PV - 29%; EV - 19
Peroutka/??? (C): PV - 1.2%
Logged
California8429
A-Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,785
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2308 on: November 19, 2010, 08:21:40 PM »

I created a new 2004 scenario where Dean runs as Independent after losing in the primaries. Once I began to rise in the polls the Map became almost all blue for a while until Edwards imploded. I was slightly behind Bush until the west coast began reporting results where I finnaly overtook bush in the PV and EV but was still short of the 270. Then a last minute upset of Edwards in Oregon put me over the top.



Howard Dean/Matt Gonzalez (I/G): PV - 36.2%; EV 271
Bush/Cheney (R): PV - 33.6%; EV - 248
Edwards/Richardson (D): PV - 29%; EV - 19
Peroutka/??? (C): PV - 1.2%

you seemed to have stolen a lot of Bush votes
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2309 on: November 19, 2010, 10:43:54 PM »

I created a new 2004 scenario where Dean runs as Independent after losing in the primaries. Once I began to rise in the polls the Map became almost all blue for a while until Edwards imploded. I was slightly behind Bush until the west coast began reporting results where I finnaly overtook bush in the PV and EV but was still short of the 270. Then a last minute upset of Edwards in Oregon put me over the top.



Howard Dean/Matt Gonzalez (I/G): PV - 36.2%; EV 271
Bush/Cheney (R): PV - 33.6%; EV - 248
Edwards/Richardson (D): PV - 29%; EV - 19
Peroutka/??? (C): PV - 1.2%

you seemed to have stolen a lot of Bush votes
Bush and Edwards both had Negative momentum pretty much the entire time during the general election so that helpes
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2310 on: November 20, 2010, 08:03:29 PM »

My worst P4ever results ever. 1984, I played as Jesse Jackson

(**WARNING** if you are a Democrat you may wish to look away)

Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2311 on: November 20, 2010, 08:10:55 PM »

My worst P4ever results ever. 1984, I played as Jesse Jackson

(**WARNING** if you are a Democrat you may wish to look away)



If you lost D.C., you're the worst campaigner EVER.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2312 on: November 22, 2010, 07:08:16 PM »

Best result ever as an independent Smiley

Obama and McCain got flogged through most of the campaign, I sailed through with positive momentum, while I still ran ads in every state, I focused on 11 states where I was behind by less than 25% at the start of the 4th week.
- NH
- ME
- VT
- CT
- CO
- NM
- VA
- FL
- WI
- CA
- TX

....



This was a doozy, with the election not being called until 4:24am - when CA was called for Obama, which he won by roughly 30,000 votes.

Key state results
Texas -  McCain: 40.4% - Obama: 32.4% Polnut: 25.8%
Vermont - Polnut: 41.4% - Obama: 29.6% - McCain: 28.2%
Florida -  McCain: 36.4% - Polnut: 34.1% - Obama: 28%

Totals
Obama - 287 EV - 35.5%
McCain - 216 EV - 34.8%
Polnut -    35 EV - 28.4%

The only states I didn't get over 20%, were the states I wasn't on the ballot - MA, OK, NC, DC, AZ, HI and IN

I got over 30% in
FL, WI, NH, ME, CO, VT, NV, NM, VA, CT

...and over 40% in
VT, WI
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2313 on: November 22, 2010, 10:44:13 PM »
« Edited: November 23, 2010, 01:59:17 AM by Jbrase »

2008: I played as Gore

Some how Romney was able to choose himself as Veep so lets just say it was

Gore/Warner vs 2008 Romney/1994 Romney

I won 56%-42%, 394-144

Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,398
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2314 on: November 28, 2010, 12:53:52 PM »
« Edited: November 28, 2010, 04:19:41 PM by Hashemite »

As part of my bizarre matchups spree:


Gael M. L'Hermine (D-ME)/Russ Feingold (D-WI) 75,229,465 (57.8%) and 465 EVs
Bristol Palin (R-AK)/Sarah Palin (R-AK) 54,888,867 (42.3%) and 73 EVs
Logged
MorningInAmerica
polijunkie3057
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 779
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2315 on: November 28, 2010, 10:28:29 PM »

A fun space-barred election between Al Gore and Fred Thompson (2008).

Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2316 on: December 02, 2010, 10:06:10 AM »

Illinois?!?
Logged
MorningInAmerica
polijunkie3057
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 779
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2317 on: December 03, 2010, 12:22:20 AM »

Agreed, very hard to believe.

Also, I'm not sure what Tennessee, NC, and Missouri are doing going Dem while Virginia is deep red. Also, given that Gore couldn't carry his homestate in 2000, I doubt he could carry it in 2008 when the Republican opponent is ALSO a Tennessean.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2318 on: December 03, 2010, 12:33:02 AM »

A fun space-barred election between Al Gore and Fred Thompson (2008).


How did you lose TN as Thompson??
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,398
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2319 on: December 03, 2010, 01:59:47 PM »
« Edited: December 03, 2010, 07:30:24 PM by Niki the Shiwawa »


Bristol Palin/Christine O'Donnell 51,423,030 (51.1%) - 270EV
John Edwards/Evan Bayh 48,650,382 (48.3%) - 268EV
Nader 653,587 (0.6%) - 0EV
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,401
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2320 on: December 05, 2010, 03:05:13 PM »

2008:




Mitt Romney/Joseph Lieberman - 55.9%, 374 EV's

Hillary Clinton/Mark Warner - 44.1%, 164 EV's

Some interesting percentages, to say the least. It's almost realistic, minus percentages in the South.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2321 on: December 05, 2010, 03:08:42 PM »

Massachusetts and Connecticut are what're most bizarre on that map.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,401
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2322 on: December 05, 2010, 03:11:05 PM »

Massachusetts and Connecticut are what're most bizarre on that map.
Well, I got bonuses in both states since that's where the candidates were from. I also advertised and campaigned in both states, which was a help. I'm sure both MA and CT would have been closer in RL if McCain had done likewise, especially if Lieberman was his VP.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2323 on: December 10, 2010, 03:03:35 AM »

2008:




Mitt Romney/Joseph Lieberman - 55.9%, 374 EV's

Hillary Clinton/Mark Warner - 44.1%, 164 EV's

Some interesting percentages, to say the least. It's almost realistic, minus percentages in the South.
I bolded the parts that conflict with each other Tongue
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2324 on: December 12, 2010, 12:58:14 PM »

2012:
I created a scenario with Sanders running as an indie



Obama: PV - 43%; EV - 382
Romney: PV - 42%; EB- 156
Sanders: PV - 15%
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 ... 130  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.068 seconds with 11 queries.