RNC campaign literature says liberals want to ban the Bible
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 05:28:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  RNC campaign literature says liberals want to ban the Bible
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: RNC campaign literature says liberals want to ban the Bible  (Read 5462 times)
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 26, 2004, 04:20:37 PM »

Well, do they not want to remove "Under God" from the Pledge?

Do they not want to allow Gay marriage?

I see no issue here.

What about DCN claims about Bush "lying to get us to go to war"?

What about Kerry saying that the Iraqi President is a liar?
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 26, 2004, 04:28:49 PM »

Liberals can be as much Christian as a conservatives can.

Dave



John Kerry is such a great catholic.

Being pro-abortion and pro-stem cell research is really Catholic.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 26, 2004, 04:46:11 PM »

I did not mean that libs can't be Christians. I just meant that Christians tend to be more right-wing, sorry. Smiley

Actually, it's 50% true.

They want to pass "hate speech" laws that would be contrary to the Bible, ban certain kinds of preaching, and in theory, would require the Bible to be made politically correct.

It's a serious movement inside the party. They consider it protecting gay people (plus other alternative lifestyles) and their "civil rights." Sexism, anti-gay, you name it.

Some of the Bible can be interpreted into hate speech.  

No, we don't want to ban it, but get it out of my face.  

So you're saying ban it from public places only or what?

Yes, only public places
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 26, 2004, 05:07:24 PM »

We all know the DNC is the anti-Christian party of the two. A third of them would gladly take "under God" out of the pledge and make it illegal to try to convert homosexuals in public.

I'm curious as to where you got the figure that 33% of the Democratic Party wants to do those things.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 26, 2004, 05:12:11 PM »

Actually, it's 50% true.

They want to pass "hate speech" laws that would be contrary to the Bible, ban certain kinds of preaching, and in theory, would require the Bible to be made politically correct.

It's a serious movement inside the party. They consider it protecting gay people (plus other alternative lifestyles) and their "civil rights." Sexism, anti-gay, you name it.

Some of the Bible can be interpreted into hate speech.  

No, we don't want to ban it, but get it out of my face.  

Most of the Quran can be interpreted into hate speech.  

No, we don't want to ban it, but get it out of my face.  

I couldn't agree more.  Lets all just leave these absurd historical artifacts from our brutal and senseless past behind us.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: September 26, 2004, 05:49:23 PM »

I did not mean that libs can't be Christians. I just meant that Christians tend to be more right-wing, sorry. Smiley

Actually, it's 50% true.

They want to pass "hate speech" laws that would be contrary to the Bible, ban certain kinds of preaching, and in theory, would require the Bible to be made politically correct.

It's a serious movement inside the party. They consider it protecting gay people (plus other alternative lifestyles) and their "civil rights." Sexism, anti-gay, you name it.

Some of the Bible can be interpreted into hate speech.  

No, we don't want to ban it, but get it out of my face.  

So you're saying ban it from public places only or what?

Yes, only public places

Banning the Bible from public places? I rest my case.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: September 26, 2004, 05:52:20 PM »

I did not mean that libs can't be Christians. I just meant that Christians tend to be more right-wing, sorry. Smiley

Actually, it's 50% true.

They want to pass "hate speech" laws that would be contrary to the Bible, ban certain kinds of preaching, and in theory, would require the Bible to be made politically correct.

It's a serious movement inside the party. They consider it protecting gay people (plus other alternative lifestyles) and their "civil rights." Sexism, anti-gay, you name it.

Some of the Bible can be interpreted into hate speech.  

No, we don't want to ban it, but get it out of my face.  

So you're saying ban it from public places only or what?

Yes, only public places

Banning the Bible from public places? I rest my case.

I rest my case.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: September 26, 2004, 05:57:22 PM »

You had a case?
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: September 27, 2004, 09:53:30 AM »

Everything about liberalism conflicts with the Bible
Logged
nomorelies
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 739


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: September 27, 2004, 10:16:39 AM »

Everything that Bush does as President conflicts Conservatism
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: September 27, 2004, 12:38:40 PM »

Literalism = being literate
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: September 27, 2004, 12:53:29 PM »

Everything about liberalism conflicts with the Bible

"But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good in them which despitefully use you and persecute you." - Matthew 5:44

"Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy." - Matthew 5:7

"Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God." - Matthew 5:9

"But whoever has the world's goods, and beholds his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him?" - 1 John 3:17

That doesn't sound very conservative in nature...
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: September 27, 2004, 12:55:09 PM »

Doesn't sound very liberal in nature
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: September 27, 2004, 12:57:52 PM »

Everything about liberalism conflicts with the Bible

Everything about *literalism* conflicts with the Bible





Aaaaaagghhh!
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: September 27, 2004, 01:00:33 PM »

Doesn't sound very liberal in nature

What is "liberal in nature", in that case?
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: September 27, 2004, 02:47:11 PM »

I did not mean that libs can't be Christians. I just meant that Christians tend to be more right-wing, sorry. Smiley

Actually, it's 50% true.

They want to pass "hate speech" laws that would be contrary to the Bible, ban certain kinds of preaching, and in theory, would require the Bible to be made politically correct.

It's a serious movement inside the party. They consider it protecting gay people (plus other alternative lifestyles) and their "civil rights." Sexism, anti-gay, you name it.

Some of the Bible can be interpreted into hate speech.  

No, we don't want to ban it, but get it out of my face.  

So you're saying ban it from public places only or what?

Yes, only public places

Banning the Bible from public places? I rest my case.

Public places like church?
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: September 27, 2004, 02:54:23 PM »


I believe that "public places" is meant to mean "places owned by the government", not "places where lots of people are".
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: September 27, 2004, 06:52:05 PM »

Oh, let's ban the Bible. Great idea! In fact, let's ban everything offensive and hateful, because we dislike it. Well, Mark Twain's work contains the 'N' word, so let's ban it in public places. In fact, to avoid offending everyone, we are banning all written, spoken, and gestured language within public property. Let's also urinate on the Bill of Rights and wipe our arses with the Declaration of Independence. You see where I'm going with this, don't you?

Liberty comes at many prices - one of them is dealing with other people who also must be free. Not everyone will get along, and just because you dislike what someone else says or believes that does not give you the right to censor them. JUST IGNORE IT. Tolerance is a virtue of liberalism - but tolerance does not mean the same thing as acceptance. I accept gays, I tolerate Nazis and Communists. There's a big difference. Even if I think Nazis and Communists are morons with dangerous philosophies(which thankfully have been castrated by history) I don't advocate banning them.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: September 27, 2004, 08:12:44 PM »

Oh, let's ban the Bible. Great idea! In fact, let's ban everything offensive and hateful, because we dislike it. Well, Mark Twain's work contains the 'N' word, so let's ban it in public places. In fact, to avoid offending everyone, we are banning all written, spoken, and gestured language within public property. Let's also urinate on the Bill of Rights and wipe our arses with the Declaration of Independence. You see where I'm going with this, don't you?

Liberty comes at many prices - one of them is dealing with other people who also must be free. Not everyone will get along, and just because you dislike what someone else says or believes that does not give you the right to censor them. JUST IGNORE IT. Tolerance is a virtue of liberalism - but tolerance does not mean the same thing as acceptance. I accept gays, I tolerate Nazis and Communists. There's a big difference. Even if I think Nazis and Communists are morons with dangerous philosophies(which thankfully have been castrated by history) I don't advocate banning them.

Yes, I agree fully.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: September 27, 2004, 08:17:57 PM »

Good. Then you disagree with the leftist line of thinking.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: September 27, 2004, 08:34:46 PM »

I'm beginning to see why some people are starting to call you a troll.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: September 28, 2004, 06:42:17 AM »
« Edited: September 28, 2004, 06:43:38 AM by John Dibble »

Good. Then you disagree with the leftist line of thinking.

I disagree with 'leftist' thinking, but leftism is more about economics than anything else. What I disagree with here is intolerance - something not exclusive to the left.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.24 seconds with 14 queries.