NY-20 Special Election
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:13:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NY-20 Special Election
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 ... 41
Author Topic: NY-20 Special Election  (Read 179070 times)
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #600 on: March 31, 2009, 10:23:37 PM »
« edited: March 31, 2009, 10:26:18 PM by cinyc »

You know that if Tedisco was leading by 65 votes, the media would just declare it for him now.

Nonsense.  It may be 59 votes, if you believe the CBS 6 Albany and WNYT Albany counts.

Why are the absentees expected to favor Murphy?

We don't know, Torie.  Anyone who claims they do is lying.  If the absentees more or less follow the actual vote and they're disproportionately from Greene or Saratoga counties, they probably favor Tedisco.  If they're disproportionately from Columbia, Essex, Warren or Washington counties, they probably favor Murphy.  

Bizarrely, Delaware and Greene Counties went different ways -  Murphy outperformed 2006 Gillibrand  in Delaware County but lagged in Greene.   Delaware County is in the Binghamton DMA while Greene is in the Albany DMA.  Maybe that had something to do with it?

Greene is in Tedisco's AD, I believe.

If you notice, Tedisco overperformed in his AD and underperformed worse the further you get away.  Murphy underperformed in Warren for some reason (home county).

Good point about Greene.

Underperformed versus what is the question.  Murphy did 1.95 points better in Warren County than Gillibrand in 2006 (which is what I've been using as a baseline).  Unless you have the County-by-CD stats, you can't directly compare Obama's performance in most counties because only parts of most counties are in the district (I'm not sure about Warren).  The worthless New York State Board of Elections site doesn't have that information.

Edit:  Tedisco's AD doesn't include any of Greene, just parts of Schenectady and Saratoga counties.
Logged
SamInTheSouth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 389


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #601 on: March 31, 2009, 10:26:02 PM »

All in but the absentees, recount and lawsuits:

Murphy 77,344   (50.02%)
Tedesco 77,279 (49.98%)

Murphy +65


Yes, that must be it for now. Hopefully the absentee ballots will favor Murphy, but it's not a done deal.

There can't be more than 200 overseas military voters ...

Why are the absentees expected to favor Murphy?

They are assuming they are military ballots, which typically lean heavily Republican.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #602 on: March 31, 2009, 10:26:25 PM »

You know that if Tedisco was leading by 65 votes, the media would just declare it for him now.

Nonsense.  It may be 59 votes, if you believe the CBS 6 Albany and WNYT Albany counts.

Why are the absentees expected to favor Murphy?

We don't know, Torie.  Anyone who claims they do is lying.  If the absentees more or less follow the actual vote and they're disproportionately from Greene or Saratoga counties, they probably favor Tedisco.  If they're disproportionately from Columbia, Essex, Warren or Washington counties, they probably favor Murphy.  

Bizarrely, Delaware and Greene Counties went different ways -  Murphy outperformed 2006 Gillibrand  in Delaware County but lagged in Greene.   Delaware County is in the Binghamton DMA while Greene is in the Albany DMA.  Maybe that had something to do with it?

Greene is in Tedisco's AD, I believe.

If you notice, Tedisco overperformed in his AD and underperformed worse the further you get away.  Murphy underperformed in Warren for some reason (home county).

Good point about Greene.

Underperformed versus what is the question.  Murphy did 1.95 points better in Warren County than Gillibrand in 2006 (which is what I've been using as a baseline).  Unless you have the County-by-CD stats, you can't directly compare Obama's performance in most counties because only parts of most counties are in the district (I'm not sure about Warren).  The worthless New York State Board of Elections site doesn't have that information.

Warren is Murphy's home county - henceforth my point that I'm surprised he didn't perform better there.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #603 on: March 31, 2009, 10:39:23 PM »

All in but the absentees, recount and lawsuits:

Murphy 77,344   (50.02%)
Tedesco 77,279 (49.98%)

Murphy +65


Yes, that must be it for now. Hopefully the absentee ballots will favor Murphy, but it's not a done deal.

There can't be more than 200 overseas military voters ...

Why are the absentees expected to favor Murphy?

They are assuming they are military ballots, which typically lean heavily Republican.

200 military ballots- that would mean that Tedesco would need to win by a margin of about 66-33. That's a tall order- even from the military. I am guessing it will be more like a 40 vote gain for Tedesco....making him 20 votes short..
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #604 on: March 31, 2009, 10:49:42 PM »

Provisionals, too.  I imagine that provisionals will essentially cancel out military absentees, and we'll be left at square one.
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #605 on: March 31, 2009, 10:50:42 PM »
« Edited: March 31, 2009, 11:02:59 PM by CARLHAYDEN »

All in but the absentees, recount and lawsuits:

Murphy 77,344   (50.02%)
Tedesco 77,279 (49.98%)

Murphy +65


Yes, that must be it for now. Hopefully the absentee ballots will favor Murphy, but it's not a done deal.

There can't be more than 200 overseas military voters ...

Why are the absentees expected to favor Murphy?

They are assuming they are military ballots, which typically lean heavily Republican.

200 military ballots- that would mean that Tedesco would need to win by a margin of about 66-33. That's a tall order- even from the military. I am guessing it will be more like a 40 vote gain for Tedesco....making him 20 votes short..

Sorry Weasel, but,

To his credit, Lunar correctly noted that 5,907 absentee votes have already been received, and a few more (primarily military) should be added.

So, approximately 6,000 absentee votes yet to be counted.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #606 on: March 31, 2009, 10:53:48 PM »

Right, there is about 6,000 received. At the same, there is potential for another 4,000 votes that may or may not have been sent.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #607 on: March 31, 2009, 11:11:14 PM »

A chart:

CountyMurphy %      2006  D% Change        County Turnout vs 2006
Columbia
56.31%
-2.01%
64.49%
Delaware
49.81%
3.74%
53.12%
Dutchess
51.57%
-3.58%
58.06%
Essex
55.29%
1.75%
50.77%
Greene
44.68%
-3.22%
60.10%
Ostego
48.76%
-3.80%
52.33%
Rensselaer
48.53%
-4.83%
63.96%
Saratoga
46.07%
-6.53%
72.71%
Warren
55.75%
1.92%
67.68%
Washington
56.03%
2.88%
69.86%
Total
50.02%
-3.08%
65.60%

Before counting absentees, the greatest percentage of ballots cast versus the 2006 off-year election number was in Saratoga County, home to part of Tedisco's Assembly district.  It was one of Tedisco's best counties (along with Greene), and the one with the most improvement from Sweeney in 2006.

Turnout was lowest, relatively speaking, in rural Essex, Ostego, Delaware and Dutchess counties.  The lowest turnout tended to be in pro-Murphy or marginal counties.   If the absentees are from there, Murphy should pull this out. 
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,490
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #608 on: March 31, 2009, 11:11:36 PM »

This is going to go on forever. Get ready.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #609 on: March 31, 2009, 11:13:08 PM »

The lowest turnout tended to be in pro-Murphy or marginal counties.

Well isn't that suspicious.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,044
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #610 on: March 31, 2009, 11:22:07 PM »

This is going to go on forever. Get ready.

Me and you will have something in common!
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,490
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #611 on: March 31, 2009, 11:25:03 PM »

This is going to go on forever. Get ready.

Me and you will have something in common!

Haha, we already have a few things in common but that's true.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #612 on: March 31, 2009, 11:32:35 PM »

The lowest turnout tended to be in pro-Murphy or marginal counties.

Well isn't that suspicious.

Not really.  All 4 of those counties are at the fringes of NY-20, with 3 of the 4 lowest-turnout counties (Delaware, Dutchess, Essex) actually outside of the Albany DMA (TV market), and Ostego only marginally inside it.  They may not have been as innundated with ads were they watching New York, Binghamton, Utica, Syracuse or Burlington/Plattsburgh TV stations instead of the network stations from Albany.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #613 on: March 31, 2009, 11:35:05 PM »

This is going to go on forever. Get ready.

Me and you will have something in common!

You have 6 years left for a fight.  This can go on for a maximum of 21 months until the next general election.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #614 on: March 31, 2009, 11:38:14 PM »

This is going to go on forever. Get ready.

Me and you will have something in common!

You have 6 years left for a fight.  This can go on for a maximum of 21 months until the next general election.

Which would give the Republicans a very easy way to freeze a Democrat out until the 2010 elections should Murphy look like he's going to win.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,453


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #615 on: March 31, 2009, 11:45:01 PM »

This is going to go on forever. Get ready.

Me and you will have something in common!

You have 6 years left for a fight.  This can go on for a maximum of 21 months until the next general election.

Which would give the Republicans a very easy way to freeze a Democrat out until the 2010 elections should Murphy look like he's going to win.

The difference is the lack of filibuster in this case.  The GOP doesn't get much out of holding this seat up, the Dems majority in the House is large enough that really nothing will come down to one vote.  On the other hand with the Minnesota seat, Fraken being seated makes it easier for the Dems to get past any filibuster attempts by the GOP.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #616 on: March 31, 2009, 11:48:27 PM »
« Edited: March 31, 2009, 11:50:57 PM by cinyc »

This is going to go on forever. Get ready.

Me and you will have something in common!

You have 6 years left for a fight.  This can go on for a maximum of 21 months until the next general election.

Which would give the Republicans a very easy way to freeze a Democrat out until the 2010 elections should Murphy look like he's going to win.

Downstate, we still voted on the 50-year-old mechanical lever machines in the 2008 elections.  There are no hanging chads or dangling chads or half-filled circles to interpret. 

New York was supposed to replace those machines soon.  Did they by this election?   I don't know - but Eraserhead should, since he voted.  If they didn't, there won't be as much to argue over as there was in Minnesota.  Voter intent is clear with the lever machines.  They either registered a vote or didn't.

I doubt this will drag on for more than a few months.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #617 on: March 31, 2009, 11:53:23 PM »

Good question - was it lever voting upstate?  Because there won't be much argument, if so - I'm with cinyc there.  It's pretty clear. 

I actually hope they never replace the things.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #618 on: March 31, 2009, 11:59:50 PM »

Good question - was it lever voting upstate?  Because there won't be much argument, if so - I'm with cinyc there.  It's pretty clear. 

I actually hope they never replace the things.

It looks like Murphy did:
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #619 on: April 01, 2009, 12:03:29 AM »

All in but the absentees, recount and lawsuits:

Murphy 77,344   (50.02%)
Tedesco 77,279 (49.98%)

Murphy +65


Yes, that must be it for now. Hopefully the absentee ballots will favor Murphy, but it's not a done deal.

There can't be more than 200 overseas military voters ...

Why are the absentees expected to favor Murphy?

They are assuming they are military ballots, which typically lean heavily Republican.

200 military ballots- that would mean that Tedesco would need to win by a margin of about 66-33. That's a tall order- even from the military. I am guessing it will be more like a 40 vote gain for Tedesco....making him 20 votes short..

a) I didn't say that absentee ballots will favor Murphy, I hope they do.

b) 200 overseas ballots is a rough guess, unless there's a military base in NY-20. Considering that about 300.000-400.000 US soldiers are currently overseas, it'd be 1/1000 of all NY-20 voters, which of course would be around 200 overseas voters in a 160.000 turnout.
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #620 on: April 01, 2009, 12:17:16 AM »

Does anyone know the breakdown between precinct and absentee voters in 2008 in the 20th Congressional District for President?

That should give us an approximation of the breakout of the absentee vote.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #621 on: April 01, 2009, 12:26:36 AM »
« Edited: April 01, 2009, 12:32:32 AM by cinyc »

Does anyone know the breakdown between precinct and absentee voters in 2008 in the 20th Congressional District for President?

That should give us an approximation of the breakout of the absentee vote.

I don't think New York keeps that data.  I looked at the 2006 and 2008 official Saratoga County results, and there are no special precincts for absentees.  The best you could do is to try to compare the election day and final official tallies, if you can find the former somewhere. 

We do know that there are at least 6,000 and up to 10,000 outstanding absentees.  We don't have a county-by-county breakdown - yet.

Because the NY-20 boundaries don't match county lines (and New York doesn't keep Presidential election by county by CD data), direct comparisons to the 2008 Presidential results in those counties would be difficult - and perhaps misleading.  To be accurate, you'd have to recreate the CD data from precinct level data.  We may have that here somewhere.  I've been comparing results to the close 2006 NY-20 off-year election, since turnout was about half of the 2008 election so far (without absentees).
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #622 on: April 01, 2009, 01:10:01 AM »

Newsmax notes that out of the 10.055 absentee ballots that were issued, 1.800 went to "military service personnel and other citizens living abroad".

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/tedisco_challenge_race/2009/03/31/198170.html
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #623 on: April 01, 2009, 01:23:22 AM »

Newsmax notes that out of the 10.055 absentee ballots that were issued, 1.800 went to "military service personnel and other citizens living abroad".

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/tedisco_challenge_race/2009/03/31/198170.html

Thanks - but consider the source.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #624 on: April 01, 2009, 03:56:27 AM »

Entertaining. Grin
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 ... 41  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.072 seconds with 11 queries.