AP "Source": GOP considers Pataki for US Senate run
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 06:02:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  AP "Source": GOP considers Pataki for US Senate run
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AP "Source": GOP considers Pataki for US Senate run  (Read 1337 times)
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 19, 2009, 02:29:01 PM »
« edited: February 19, 2009, 02:30:50 PM by Lunar »

AP "Source": GOP considers Pataki for US Senate run

I have to make this thread so that someone doesn't create a stupid misleading title on this story and have the idea be permanently ingrained as a fact Smiley but seriously

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/6270975.html

ALBANY, N.Y. — The head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee approached former Gov. George Pataki this week about running for the U.S. Senate in 2010, according to a person who spoke to Pataki about the private meeting.

The person confirmed Tuesday's meeting in New York City between Pataki and Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican who heads the party's national senate campaign committee. The person spoke on the condition of anonymity because he isn't authorized to comment.

Pataki, now in private law practice, hasn't yet accepted or rejected the idea, the person said. The race would be against Kirsten Gillibrand, who was recently appointed to succeed Hillary Rodham Clinton when she became Barack Obama's secretary of state.

Pataki didn't immediately respond to a request for comment at his law office.

Cornyn's office referred questions to the committee, which didn't immediately comment.

Gillibrand was appointed Jan. 23 by Democratic Gov. David Paterson after a selection process that was sharply criticized for its secrecy and mixed signals. The process included a public view that Caroline Kennedy, daughter of President Kennedy, was Paterson's first choice until she abruptly withdrew. Paterson later said he had long favored Gillibrand.

After Kennedy withdrew, a person close to Paterson leaked to the media information that was critical of the daughter of slain President John F. Kennedy, including that she had tax and nanny problems and her marriage was in trouble. There was no evidence to support the allegations.

Gillibrand, who was a relatively unknown second-term congresswoman from upstate Columbia County, will face a 2010 special election for the remainder of Clinton's term then a general election in 2012 for a full, six-year term. She has said she intends to run both years, a commitment that Paterson sought.

Rep. Peter King, a Long Island Republican, has already said he's interested in facing Gillibrand in 2010.

The 63-year-old Pataki is a Republican who won three terms in the blue state, beating Democratic icon Mario Cuomo in 1994, still considered one of the nation's biggest GOP upsets. Pataki served as a moderate Republican, strong on environmental policy and who was credited early in his tenure for turning around state finances and the economy.

He grew up in the lower Hudson Valley, lived in Manhattan as a young lawyer, and bought a home in the Adirondacks.

He never lost a race for elected office and was skilled at beating incumbents.

"You're talking about a Republican who has won statewide in New York three times and in the last 30 years, only (Sen.) Al D'Amato and George Pataki can say that," said Steven Greenberg of the Siena College poll. "Given that there are so many statewide offices up next year, and not a lot of Republicans who have the stature, the fundraising ability and the prominence statewide, certainly George Pataki would be a formidable candidate."


scorecard
Cornyn's overtures to Pataki also would indicate that Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) is inclined to remain in the House.  Recent polling has shown the Long Island-area congressman trailing Gillibrand by double-digits.

UPDATE: From National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman Brian Walsh: "As a general rule, we don't comment on private conversations the Senator has. As NRSC Chairman of course he is speaking with top Republicans in states with potentially competitive seats.

"Frankly, it would be a surprise if he was not doing that because that's a key part of the job and one he takes seriously."
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,453


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2009, 03:17:32 PM »

A big reason why Pataki never lost a race in NY is he knew he had no chance in hell of winning re-election in 06 so he declined to run.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2009, 03:26:01 PM »

A big reason why Pataki never lost a race in NY is he knew he had no chance in hell of winning re-election in 06 so he declined to run.

But he is still about the only NY GOPer we have to fear nonetheless.  The legend may allow a victory for the man.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,754
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2009, 03:31:00 PM »

I hope King still runs though. House pick up. Smiley
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2009, 04:12:46 PM »

A big reason why Pataki never lost a race in NY is he knew he had no chance in hell of winning re-election in 06 so he declined to run.

But he is still about the only NY GOPer we have to fear nonetheless.  The legend may allow a victory for the man.

Err... what? No one wins [general] elections on their mystique of being unbeatable. Unless you meant a victory in the GOP primary.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2009, 04:25:42 PM »
« Edited: February 19, 2009, 04:30:08 PM by Lunar »

Well, Pataki's advantages are obvious: very high name recognition against an incumbent that nobody voted for and nobody knows.  Gilly does bad in polls right now because polls right now are name recognition polls.  I assume Gillibrand can raise the $25-35 million she'll need to get her name recognition and biography out there in order to beat Pataki, but think it's fair to assume the name "Pataki" will conjure better memories than "the years between 2008 and 2010"

But the fact that Cornyn met with Pataki is not especially newsworthy.  He's going to meet with a lot of people whom he's going to unsuccessfully attempt to convince them to run for Senate.  Hell, he's going to meet with people whom he's going to unsuccessfully attempt convince them to NOT run as well, haha.  Some number of the people he meets with will run, and of course, meeting with Cornyn is a almost certainly a prerequisite to running a Senate campaign.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 19, 2009, 06:02:36 PM »

I like Pataki but he is very bland and would probably end up being a huge disappointment.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2009, 06:13:40 PM »

At best this would probably be the mirror image of the Musgrove/Wicker race in MS. 
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 19, 2009, 06:42:02 PM »

At best this would probably be the mirror image of the Musgrove/Wicker race in MS. 

Pretty much, yeah. I'd still get more amusement out of watching a semi-competitive race than a complete blowout though.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 19, 2009, 07:06:16 PM »

A big reason why Pataki never lost a race in NY is he knew he had no chance in hell of winning re-election in 06 so he declined to run.

But he is still about the only NY GOPer we have to fear nonetheless.  The legend may allow a victory for the man.

Err... what? No one wins [general] elections on their mystique of being unbeatable. Unless you meant a victory in the GOP primary.

I'm not saying the mystique of being unbeatable.  I mean that alot of people talk about how great he is whether they know his accomplishments or not.  People think hes great because people say his great and most people are too stupid to do research.  I'm not saying that hes going to win but only that he is the closest thing to a threat...
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2009, 07:54:58 PM »

good luck with that
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 11 queries.