"Living standards" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:57:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  "Living standards" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: "Living standards"  (Read 1523 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: February 23, 2009, 10:46:36 PM »

It varies based on who you're asking. Conservatives will focus more on household appliances, since they are more prevalent for any given income (particularly lower incomes) since the 1990s than the 1970s. But this ignores the ways that technology makes things cheaper. Those that argue that costs of living have increased, like Elizabeth Warren, will focus on things such as education, health and housing costs. But none of these things have a widely accepted quantitative measure of well-being.

When people give a particular percentage they are probably talking about real median income or real average income. They may also be talking about average wages. A strong argument can be made that much of the wage growth since the 1970s was due to women entering the workforce. If you just look at men, there was hardly any growth.

The ultimate dumbass conservative comment is to rhetorically ask "How many people had a gigaflops computer in 1968?"
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.