Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2018, 06:21:18 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
| | |-+  Good banks bitter over bailout
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Good banks bitter over bailout  (Read 1413 times)
CARLHAYDEN
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,647


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 07, 2009, 12:31:24 pm »

Suggest reading the article in the following link concerning the understandable bitterness of the responsible banks for having to bear the costs for irresponsible banks as part of the bailout.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=anmrn4H8hXfw&refer=exclusive
Logged

Registered in Arizona for Fantasy election purposes.
Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14,405


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2009, 12:40:49 pm »

Very understandable. I do think these banks like Citigroup need to fail, but it needs to be done in a fashion that doesn't unravel our whole economy. Needless to say these banks that didn't make these sh**tty loans should definitely get an advantage from the government and as the article states, they are already getting a competitive advantage amongst consumers.
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 43,128


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2009, 02:33:10 pm »

Moral of the story, it pays to screw up if you're "too big to fail".  Of course if you don't screw up and you're not too big to fail, you get screwed. Something like 80% of small businesses fail within 5 years, but no one bails them out.
Logged

Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16,734


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2009, 03:29:59 pm »

The actual moral of the story is not to force big banks to give subprime loans.  These banks failed because they were bullied by the federal government into practicing poor banking.

"Offered financial incentives" is not bullying. Blame is on all sides.
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 43,128


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 07, 2009, 03:34:56 pm »

The actual moral of the story is not to force big banks to give subprime loans.  These banks failed because they were bullied by the federal government into practicing poor banking.

"Offered financial incentives" is not bullying. Blame is on all sides.

Exactly, no one forced the banks to be stupid. Not to say that some borrowers aren't to blame too, but the banks can stop trying to blame other people.
Logged

Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21,202


Political Matrix
E: -0.84, S: -3.04


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2009, 12:11:22 am »

Fezzy's right. It was the regulations implemented by the government that started this whole mess, put into place by past Democratic presidents. They felt it was a "right" to own a home and thus forced banks to lend to unqualified people. Now we're facing an economic meltdown and the Democrats want to place MORe regulations on the industry.
Logged
Mint
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,568
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2009, 12:34:48 am »

Fezzy's right. It was the regulations implemented by the government that started this whole mess, put into place by past Democratic presidents. They felt it was a "right" to own a home and thus forced banks to lend to unqualified people. Now we're facing an economic meltdown and the Democrats want to place MORe regulations on the industry.
The banks covered under the CRA were responsible for about 1 in 4 of sub-prime loans by the federal reserve's own admission, but the bulk of it occurred outside of government supervision. By contrast private institutions comprised about twice that much. Obviously that doesn't absolve the government of blame but saying they were responsible for the bulk of these loans is silly. If anything, the government is at fault for creating a moral hazard after the last bank related fiasco (the S&L crisis).
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines