Property rights
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 01:31:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Property rights
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should government have the power to do this?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 11

Author Topic: Property rights  (Read 1545 times)
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 30, 2004, 05:05:21 PM »

The following is from an article by Walter Williams that appeared in the Free Market news Network. Should Government have the power to do this?


 Mr. John A. Rapanos, a 68-year Michigan landowner faces a ten month federal imprisonment and up to $10 million in fines. Mr. Rapanos cleared and graded 200 acres of fallow farmland that he had owned since 1950 with the intention of constructing a shopping center. When the shopping center deal fell through, he leased the land to a local grain farmer. What was his crime?
Under the Clean Water Act, no person may discharge, dredge or put fill material into the navigable waters of the U.S. without a permit. The closest navigable waters to Mr. Rapanos' land is Saginaw Bay some 20 miles away. Mr. Rapanos' crime in the eyes of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was that he filled in depressions on his land without permission. According to his defense at the California-based Pacific Legal Foundation, "the Corps has argued that isolated pools and puddles were magically transformed into 'navigable waters', and subject to regulations, merely by the stopover of 'migratory' birds." With the Corps reasoning, you could go to jail if you had a tree stump ground out and filled the hole.


 
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2004, 05:10:34 PM »

This is one of the reason we need to bring state nullification back.
Logged
Posterity
Rookie
**
Posts: 129


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2004, 05:17:11 PM »
« Edited: September 30, 2004, 05:39:37 PM by Posterity »

No, the government should not have the power to do this.  I can understand certain restrictions that protect rivers, lakes, etc. from damaging actions, but that does not sound like it's applicable in this case.

I bet there is more to this story that explains the government's abuse of power.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2004, 05:37:14 PM »

That's so ridiculously stupid.
Logged
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2004, 06:31:27 PM »

No, the government should not have the power to do this.  I can understand certain restrictions that protect rivers, lakes, etc. from damaging actions, but that does not sound like it's applicable in this case.

I bet there is more to this story that explains the government's abuse of power.

Unfortunately this story is not unique. Following are other examples of abuse by government agencies:

http://www.albrightseed.com/safe_harbor.htm

http://www.nationalcenter.org/ph18.html

http://realtytimes.com/rtcpages/19990902_clash.htm

http://www.fee.org/vnews.php?nid=213
Logged
Dave from Michigan
9iron768
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2004, 10:08:09 PM »

anyone ever read the book,  Mugged by the state
It's full of this kind of stuff.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.