A better system would be to open a thread (for each) based on each proposal for a new government and debate each one individually, not decide right out of the gate which one we're focusing on.
I have to agree. While I am very keen on Smid's proposal and won't hide that. I feel we are perhaps moving a bit too fast. We can't pick a model then try and create a system of government that fits into it. It is better to work out the system before we determine the model. For me the real issue is simply -
do we move towards a parliamentary model yes or no? If no what are the alternatives. If yes, that's where we go and we than build a system from there.
On the whole, there has to be further discussion of alternatives.
