O.K then here we go:
The only reason why she used the oil money to balance the budget is because she made a mess of the economy. Oil was used to paper over the cracks of economic stupidity.
Well... seeing as her goal was monetarism, she failed. Her vision of 19th centuary economic liberalism sans the social side, was never implimented. She Failed.
BTW it's absurd to say she made the U.K's economy strong. Check out some statistical yearbooks etc and don't believe what the media tells you.
Not true.
The Poll Tax was UNFAIR and morally wrong.
Good for you.
What she did to the Mining communities was pure evil.
No other argument is viable(and I'm not defending "King Arthur", I think he's an arsehole. He was right but he went about it completely the wrong way)
Her "reforms" acheived nothing but a credit "boom" and a huge recession. 3 Million. I'm going to repeat that until it sinks in.
And? What's that prove?
So did every British P.M during the Cold War.
Although it was her idiotic decision to remove the patrol boat that left an open goal for the Argentinians to start with...
I see no reason to insult you.
I will insult the Grantham Ripper though.