1932 German Presidency without Hindenburg
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 05:08:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  International What-ifs (Moderator: Dereich)
  1932 German Presidency without Hindenburg
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1932 German Presidency without Hindenburg  (Read 3960 times)
rob in cal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,982
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 28, 2009, 03:19:03 PM »

Lets assume President Hindenburg dies two years early, in 1932, and thus we have no Hitler vs. Hindenburg election.  What do the pro-Republic Center and Social Democrat Parties do for a candidate to stand against Hitler?  Personally I have no idea, as I haven't found any literature on the subject of even a fallback strategy that the pro-Weimar Republic Parties had for the 1932 election without Hindenburg.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2009, 08:21:47 PM »

Even if you have to restore Kaiser Wilhelm II to prevent the rise of the Antichrist, you do so.



Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2009, 03:18:04 PM »

Even if you have to restore Kaiser Wilhelm II to prevent the rise of the Antichrist, you do so.





Uh. What?
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2009, 11:55:08 PM »

Even if you have to restore Kaiser Wilhelm II to prevent the rise of the Antichrist, you do so.
Uh. What?

I assume he meant Hitler.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 11, 2009, 03:27:29 AM »

Somebody saner, probably a Center politico.

The results would have been almost exactly identical, btw - Hindenburg's core constituency voted for Hitler in these elections.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2009, 05:39:58 AM »

Even if you have to restore Kaiser Wilhelm II to prevent the rise of the Antichrist, you do so.
Uh. What?

I assume he meant Hitler.

Obviously. But his statement makes absolutely no sense historically.
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,536
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2009, 04:14:41 PM »
« Edited: June 01, 2009, 04:17:16 PM by Dan the Roman »

Brunning likely would have been a front-runner. He was minimally acceptable to the SPD, the Liberal parties, and would of course have had the Center behind him. He also was more popular than let on by contemporaries as he was very well received in the July Reichstag Elections.

Alternatively,someone like Carl Gordealer would have been drafted. Another potentially interesting candidate would have been Interior and Defense Minister Groener. He was a former commander and chief  of the German Army and would have had a large degree of military support, but his hard line against the Nazis made him very popular with the SPD. He was also an extremely close ally of Brunning's.

In either case I doubt Hitler would have run the runoff, and given that the Nazis were a few months from total collapse in the fall of 1932, and that with no Hindenburg there would have been no election until 1934, I think its highly unlikely Hitler would have come to power in this scenario.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.218 seconds with 14 queries.