Who would you have voted for... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:37:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Who would you have voted for... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ... in the 2004 election for US Senate in Oklahoma?
#1
Tom Coburn (Republican)		  
#2
Brad Carson (Democratic)		  
#3
Sheila Bilyeu (Independent)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 38

Author Topic: Who would you have voted for...  (Read 2668 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607
« on: June 06, 2009, 09:43:49 PM »
I was happy with both Coburn and Carson. I would have voted for the former.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2009, 04:26:07 PM »
Quote from: Nym90 on June 10, 2009, 04:18:03 PM
so called "social issues" are primarily meant to distract attention away from economic issues (by special interest groups on both sides, admittedly).


Why can't people just accept that social issues (I have no idea why they're "so called 'social issues'" by the way) mean as much or more to some people? Why do economic issues have to be everyone's top priority? Why are we just "distracted" into believing they are more important?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.