That's the whole reason that an idea that the terrorist would commit an act to some how cause an effect in the vote is rediculous. It would cause turmoil but it would be impossible to predict how the electorate would react.
The terrorists really don't care who wins. I'm certain they would prefere Kerry, but there main cause is to destroy us. That stays constant no matter who is in office. The question is, who is more prepared to deal with the threats and the after-math of
future attacks that are
certain to happen. An interesting treand has developed in the polls. A majority of people believe that we are losing the War on Terror, but a majority still prefere Bush, indicating that they realize that this thing is for the long haul and any negative things that happen are not nessesarily Bush's fault and certain attacks cannot be prevented. For that reason I believe that another attack would probably help Bush.