Atlasia v. JewishConservative

[bgwah]

He has two accounts registered.

[Sam Spade]

Jesus, could you:

1) List the two accounts he is accused of having;
2) State please the exact clauses of the CCJA that you are bringing prosecution under (technical thingy)

Thanks.

[Sam Spade]

bumping - this is pretty important actually.

[bgwah]

CCJA, Section 1 Clause 3

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=4713
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=3695

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

He has two accounts registered.

Isa, one is banned, you know?

If so, you can presecute some other Atlasians.

[Franzl]

He has two accounts registered.

Isa, one is banned, you know?

If so, you can presecute some other Atlasians.

That would be irrelevant.

[Sam Spade]

We've decided to take this case.

The justice assigned for the trial will be announced shortly.

[Mechaman]

He has two accounts registered.

Isa, one is banned, you know?

If so, you can presecute some other Atlasians.

That would be irrelevant.

Oh come on!
YOu pretty much said that any poster who is trying to turn over a new leaf by starting an entirely new account is liable to be taken to court?
WTF?

[Хahar 🤔]

He has two accounts registered.

Isa, one is banned, you know?

If so, you can presecute some other Atlasians.

That would be irrelevant.

Oh come on!
YOu pretty much said that any poster who is trying to turn over a new leaf by starting an entirely new account is liable to be taken to court?
WTF?

That be the law.

[Mechaman]

He has two accounts registered.

Isa, one is banned, you know?

If so, you can presecute some other Atlasians.

That would be irrelevant.

Oh come on!
YOu pretty much said that any poster who is trying to turn over a new leaf by starting an entirely new account is liable to be taken to court?
WTF?

That be the law.

That is so ritard.

[Sam Spade]

Well, well, well, looks like I'm running this trial...

{{bangs gavel}}

Preliminary questions for the Defendant.  They don't necessarily need to be answered in order, though the Court would suggest that you obtain counsel

1) Do you have defense counsel or wish to request that defense counsel be appointed for you?
2) How do you plead?
3) Do you wish to waive your right to a jury trial?

For the Prosecution.

1) You gave the court the two accounts.  In which two Regions were the accounts registered in? (which will go towards selecting a jury, if we have one)

I think that's all for now.

[Peter]

Has the defendant been read his rights?

[Sam Spade]

Has the defendant been read his rights?

Ain't got no clue.  I'm sending the defendant notice of this trial now.

[Sam Spade]

Just FYI - defendant(s) have not been on the forum since Feb 27, 2010 at 5:38 PM

[Conservative frontier]

Whoa. Alright then...

Just to get this over with, I plead Guilty. I have no time to log on, so yea.

[Sam Spade]

Whoa. Alright then...

Just to get this over with, I plead Guilty. I have no time to log on, so yea.

So noted.  Would you like to make a plea of leniency or exercise your right of allocution before the Court delivers sentence.

[segwaystyle2012]

Can he change his plea ?

[Conservative frontier]

Just deliver my sentence. I won't be active for awhile anyways.

[Sam Spade]

Ok, JC.  Probably not until tomorrow, though.

[Conservative frontier]

ok.

[President Mitt]

Was Pogo-Stick banned? Or was his password forgotten?

[minionofmidas]

If his previous account is banned, and this is public knowledge, doesn't the SoFA have a statutory duty to remove it from the voter rolls? If so, can JC really be criminally charged with what is essentially the DoFA's neglect? Is that constitutional?

Just food for thought...

[Sam Spade]

Opinion

On February 25, 2010, AG bgwah charged JewishConservative under Section 1, Clause 3 of the CCJA.  On March 3, 2010, JewishConservative plead guilty to the crime.  He has not asked for any leniency in punishment, rather saying "Just deliver my punishment.  I won't be active for a while anyway."

The Court notes that JewishConservative's account was banned prior to the second registration and subsequent charge.  Neither statute nor Constitution imposes a duty on the SoFA to remove those citizens who are banned from the voter rolls and one can imagine many good reasons why this is the case.  First and foremost, of course, this allows the SoFA and the AG to track new registrations and assure that new registrants are not retreads, and if so, can be charged for their crimes. 

We have addressed a similar issue before (see Atlasia v. Giovanni) and, likewise, do not believe that the circumstances that cause the creation of the second account determine the availability or scope of punishment against the creator.

With that in mind, the Court delivers the following punishment:

1) 90-day ban from voting in any Atlasian elections;
2) 180-day ban holding any office under the Republic of Atlasia.

So ordered.