Will there ever be a Democratic landslide again? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 11:59:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Will there ever be a Democratic landslide again? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 130

Author Topic: Will there ever be a Democratic landslide again?  (Read 32191 times)
No more McShame
FuturePrez R-AZ
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,083


« on: October 16, 2004, 01:18:53 AM »

Putting Democrats in the same sentence as social libertarianism is laughable.

Democrats love to legislate based on questionable science; 2nd hand smoke, global warming, etc.  The national party would just assume overturn the 2nd Amendment.  Today's Democrat party is run by feminists that would shut you up if they disagree with you.  Let's not forget the Kerry campaign's threats towards book stores that dare carry "Unfit for Command" and towards Sinclair Broadcasting.  Reeks of censorship to me!

The Republican Party isn't perfect, but I do believe most Republicans are stronger on social libertarian issues than most Democrats are.  Don't get me started on economic issues. Smiley
Logged
No more McShame
FuturePrez R-AZ
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,083


« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2004, 12:02:00 AM »

A regime like Hussein's could very easily pass a nuke on to Al Qaeda to be used in an American city.

Saddam Hussein would almost certainly having nuclear weapons by now. The reason he didn't get them is because we've been containing him for ten years since the first Gulf War ended. (You know, the one Kerry was against)

It is more dangerous to chose our leaders based on world opinion than it is to have rigid ideologues hate us.
So could a regime like Kadhafi's have done something like that.  There's someone who actually did commit terrorism against the US, yet he's not considered a bad guy anymore.  Amazing.  Iran is closer to developing nukes than Iraq was, yet we're not very eager to go to war with it.  There was never a Saddam-al Qaeda connection.  Saddam was never involved in terrorism against America.  Why was he an OK guy from 1979 onward but when he goes into Kuwait he's suddenly a crazy monster?  He had some legitimate gripes against Kuwait, as it was slant drilling under the border.  And Saddam thought that our ambassador April Glaspie had given him a green light to go it.  So Kerry voting against the 1991 war was his greatest moment.

In an effort to prevent all sorts of theoreticals, such and such might happen, this could happen, we are making a mess.

Quadafi gave up his weapons to us knowing that Bush was keeping his eye on him.  I'm sure he knows how to reacquire in case of a Kerry victory.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.