Which institutions would you prefer for France? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 09:01:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  International What-ifs (Moderator: Dereich)
  Which institutions would you prefer for France? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Which institutions would you prefer for France?  (Read 4826 times)
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« on: July 25, 2009, 05:14:46 PM »

Abolish regions in all but name; redraw them roughly along the lines of the old provinces. Keep departments as administrative divisions only. Grant provinces far-reaching powers. Elect regional legislatures every three years, through straight PR. Elect regional Governors every four years through IRV. Grant Governors same powers as the President.

Unicameral Parliament, elected through straight PR to term of four years. Five-year Presidential term, elected through IRV. President mostly figurehead, but with power to appoint/dismiss ministers and dissolve Parliament.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2009, 04:44:08 PM »

800 members is impossibly large. I dono't think there's a legislature in the world that large.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2009, 11:34:35 AM »

800 members is impossibly large. I dono't think there's a legislature in the world that large.

European Parliament had 785 members sometimes ago.

Yes, but it's Europe. 27 countries, not one country.

The population of a State has very few to do with the number of members of its parliament. USA are five times more populous than France, but have only 435 representatives !

And that is because a smaller legislature functions better.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2009, 01:09:39 PM »

Hardly. In India, the Lok Sabha has only 552 members, because larger parliaments do not work.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2009, 03:49:06 PM »

http://icon.cat/util/elections/UvuGokJDFn

My god...

800 people like this are less dangerous than 400, and 400 are still less dangerous than 1.
More people, more democracy.

And with enough democracy comes idiocracy. France has enough idiots with their own party already...
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2009, 03:23:59 PM »

Now Hashemite will get mad and call you a Jacobin.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2009, 03:35:13 PM »

Honestly, though, I agree with him. Absent of a clear reason to break with tradition and split Brittany, we should not do so. I am Bengali, and bureaucrats in New Delhi and Islamabad have tried to suppress our language in favor of Hindustani. Linguistic cleansing is not something that appeals to me.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.