Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Source: LA Times (url)
Obama with statistically insignificant lead in NH over Clinton By: Miamiu1027 (D-NY) - 2007-12-27 @ 20:38:24 Question I realize that the Democratic presidential caucuses and primaries for the 2008 election are weeks away. But... Q8. If the Democratic [primary/caucus] for president were being held in your state today and the candidates were New York Senator Hillary Clinton, Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd, former North Carolina Senator John Edwards, Delaware Senator Joe Biden, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, Illinois Senator Barack Obama, Ohio Representative Dennis Kucinich and former Alaska Senator Mike Gravel, for whom would you vote: Clinton, Dodd, Edwards, Biden, Richardson, Obama, Kucinich or Gravel? (INCLUDES LEANERS) DEMVTR LKLYVTR Biden 2 1 Clinton 30 30 Dodd - - Edwards 18 20 Kucinich 2 1 Obama 32 32 Richardson 5 4 Don't Know 11 12 About this Poll The Times/Bloomberg Poll was conducted by telephone among adults with landline telephone numbers, and numbers ported to cell phones, in the states of Iowa and New Hampshire. The survey began December 20th through the 23rd , was on hiatus over the 24th and 25th, and resumed on the 26th. Multiple attempts were made to contact each number over the entire survey period. The Poll interviewed 1,459 adults in the state of New Hampshire via telephone in a random sample of landline phone numbers which includes numbers ported to cell phones, statewide. Included are 1,279 registered voters (+/-3) 519 Democratic primary voters (+/-4), 361 likely Democratic primary voters, 442 Republican primary voters (+/-5), and 318 Republican likely voters (+/-6). New Hampshire primary voters and likely voters were also screened for their intention to vote, intensity of commitment, and past voting history. Login to Post Comments |
Back to 2008 Presidential Polls Home - Polls Home
© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved