PredictionsEndorse2010 Senatorial Predictions - Liberalrocks (D-CA) ResultsPolls
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Date of Prediction: 2010-11-01 Version:71

Prediction Map
Liberalrocks MapPrediction Key

* = Pickup via defeat of incumbent; ^ = Pickup of an open seat

Confidence Map
Liberalrocks MapConfidence Key

Prediction States Won
19 |
37 |
37 |
Dem11
 
pie
Rep26
 
Ind0
 
Non0
 

Confidence States Won
19 |
37 |
37 |
Dem9
 
pie
Rep21
 
Ind0
 
Tos7
 
Non0
 

State Pick-ups

Gain Loss Hold Net Gain
Inc. Open Total Inc. Open Total Inc. Open Total
Dem000-4-4-88311-8
Rep+4+4+800010818+8
Ind0000000000


Predicted Senate Control (112th Congress):
Party Seats Up Seats Not Up Total Seats
Democratic113849
Republican262349
Independent022
pie

Prediction Score (max Score = 74)

ScoreState WinsState Percentages
593425
piepiepie

Analysis

Connecticut: This state began as a tossup but Blumenthal appears to have a substantial lead at this point. Assuming the state polling is accurate.

West Virginia: Still going to be a close race but I believe Manchin will win by at least 2 pts.

NY: Both Schumer and Gillibrand will win with strong margins.

Pennsylvania: Still a tossup but at the end of the day and in this climate I believe Sestak will come up short. He was a good candidate and closed very strong but I just dont think it will be enough. (I sincerily hope I'm wrong)

Ohio: Strong Portman! I believe he will win by a stronger margin then polls are suggesting.

Illinois: Very tight could border on recount territory but I think Kirk will pull it out with strong suburban and down state margins. I think the voter enthusiasm will be felt the heaviest in Cook County (Chicago) despite other speculations of possible voter fraud.

Wisconsin: Feingold is toast and has been for quite sometime. This state is going republican across the board. The GOP will clean up in this strong Obama state.

Colorado: Bennett is closing very strong and has erased much of Bucks leads from a couple of months ago. Will it be enough? I just dont think so. However if there is a democratic suprise win I believe it will appear here before Nevada, Pennsylvania and even Illinois. I am however siding on caution and going with Buck with a slim 1 to 2 pt margin.

Nevada: Despite the Reid money being spent he has unfortunately been unable to close the slight gap in polling in the closing days. Angle has consistently lead by 3 pts or so in the averaged polling. I think that with his high negatives has him defeated here. However its still the perpetual tossup state.

California: Boxer has closed strong as she normally does in her senate bids. Polling shows her breaking out of the tossup category ever so slightly. This coupled with Brown leading substantially in the governors race bodes well for her chances. If the republicans win the senate it will go first through Washington state before California.

Washington: This state appears to have tightened up in the closing days However due to a variety of polls showing the incumbent up and based on the demographics of the state I still give the ever so slight edge to multiple term incumbent
Patty Murray.


States to Watch:
CT
WV
PA
IL
CO
NV
CA
WA

In addition to congressional races in most of the midwest early on should indicate the size or lack there of in the expected GOP wave.


Prediction History
Prediction Graph


Comments History - hide

Version: 65

PA : Two polls out of Pennsylvania now show a tighter race. At first because it was PPP I wrote it off as bias but today a second poll actually has Sestak up. It remains to be seen in this year with the current GOP climate if this race truly will be a tossup at the end of the day. I still give the clear advantage to Toomey however I must also change the status of the state to reflect the most recent polling.

West Virginia: Move back to Raese for the time being still consider this one very tight and could easily flip back to Manchin...time will tell on this one.


Version: 49

Wisconsin: Could also be tossup Republican at this point. However since the only polling firm to poll the state for the last two months has been Rasmussen, I will leave the state with 18 year incumbent Feingold by a razor thin margin. If another polling firm besides Rasmussen commissions a poll showing him behind I will move the state to Johnson.


Version: 45

Assuming Tea Party candidates prevail tonight in the primary elections of Delaware and New Hampshire.


Version: 39

If Murray in Washington, Boxer in California, Feingold in Wisconsin lose the senate will likely go to the GOP.


Version: 38

Things are not looking good for the democrats with current polling in the midwest in particuliar. Republicans have recently increased their leads in Pennsylvania, Ohio which now appear to be out of the the tossup category. They also show leads in Illinois, Missouri and Wisconsin.

Out west may be a slightly better picture for democrats but still not a great one. Colorado is a pure toss up at this point as is Nevada with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's seat in jeopardy. Polls show him with a slight edge possibly in part to the fact his opponent Sharron Angle is a nutty bitch. Still a tossup nonetheless due to his high negatives.

Washington state also appears to be headed into the tossup category with Patty Murray in the fight of her political life against two time failed GOP gubernatorial candidate Dino Rossi
California my home state is also a tossup this year with Barbara Boxer fighting off a strong challenge from former failed HP executive Carly Fiorina. Two polls have shown Fiorina ahead but they are from the same firm so I still give the edge to Boxer, however if another poll from an alternate firm comes out with Fiorina ahead I will place my state in her column.

Again non of this is good news for the democrats. However a week is a lifetime in politics and some of the trajectory in these races could and might change. However this is still appears to be a GOP wave year. The signs have pointed to this for months. Now the polls are clearly headed in that direction for the time being.


Version: 34

Economy tanks even further and we have a "Double Dip" recession.

A few incumbents make some gaffes on top of economy woes and we have one of the best case scenarios for the GOP.


Version: 32

Faye's map inspired me to have a little fun in this version...again nothing to serious here with scenario (unless polling were to change in the future?...?)I would like to see this outcome but not confident of that at this point.

KS21- Notice how Missouri is a Carnahan victory..dont get use to it being a norm in my other versions just yet.
Miles- North Carolina is a Marshall win just for you.

I hope I don't give CR a heart attack with this scenario...


Version: 30

Colorado:
This scenario assume's that Ken Buck secure's the GOP nomination in Colorado against the more mainstream Jane Norton. Both candidates are conservative but Norton has not made the outlandish statements that Buck has. Buck while not as extreme as Angle in Nevada, is not the strongest candidate for the nomination in my opinion. He may be easier to brand as "too extreme for colorado". However, the democrats dont have the money in this race as Reid does in Nevada. If Romanoff secures the democratic nomination he can more easily run as a washington outsider then Bennett could and thus would be more competitive in my mind.


Version: 29

In this scenario many of these states share something in common. Elected women. This scenario represents the most opportunities to elect women to the senate body in the current races of 2010. Currently there are 17 women serving in the United States Senate. This year presents an opportunity to elect more women to that body.It is to be noted that a record number of republican women are running this year. A grand total of 24 female senators out of 100 is possible by the number of women running this year. Based on the various states of the races, I predict a more likely outcome number of between 15-21. This year could also be dubbed as the "the year of the republican woman." if many are successful.

Alaska: Lisa Murkowski(R inc) incumbent is favored to win
California: Barbara Boxer(D inc)vs Carly Fiorina(R)two women
Washington: Patty Murray(D inc) vs Dino Rossi (R)likely nominee
Nevada: Harry Reid (D inc) vs Sharron(insane)Angle (R)
Colorado: Micheal Bennett(D inc) or Andrew Romanoff(D) vs Gail Norton(R) (if she is nominee)
Iowa: Chuck Grassley(R inc) vs Roxanne Conlin(D)
Missouri: Robin Carnahan (D) vs Roy Blunt (R)
Arkansas: Blanche Lincoln (D inc) vs John Boozman (R)
North Carolina: Richard Burr (R inc) vs Elaine Marshall (D)
Maryland: Barbara Milkulski(D inc)highly favored to win
New York: Kirsten Gillibrand (D inc) vs (R) Candidate
New Hampshire: Paul Hodes(D)vs Kelly Ayotte(if she is nominee)
Connecticut: Richard Blumenthal(D)vs Linda McMahon(R)if nominee

These races in addition to the other women serving in the senate who are not up for re-election give me a count of 24 possible female senators at this point. This map above would reflect 24 women in the next senate. Again I predict the body will have between 16-20 when all the votes are counted.

Of these possibilities on the above map :
16 Would be Democratic
8 Would be Republican


If its a Republican Sweep Woman Year the Breakdown could be
as follows. (Which I highly Doubt)
11 Democratic Women
9 Republican Women

I believe this years results will be somewhere in between the two above stated possibilities. Still great progress towards that "glass ceiling" for women.


Version: 27

Ok this version is back to reality from my last enhanced version.

This is where I believe the races to be today if the elections were held...


Version: 26

I could imagine the outcry and the blame being tossed around in the GOP if this were actually a reality in November.Certain Death for the Tea Party???

Even if the GOP only pickup up one to three seats its still technically a failure in as much as this is a year in which everything on paper should favor them. However, with tea party additions in Kentucky, Nevada and possibly Colorado races that should have been their's outright look more competitive then they should.


Version: 25

Illinois:
from Toss Up Kirk to Toss Up Giannoulias. The Obama Chicago operation will be out in full force for Giannoulias which will give him an advantage in GOTV efforts. If Kirk isnt a couple of points ahead a few days before the actual vote I say its advantage Giannoulias in this democratic state. Still the democrats should pause at the fact the race is so close in President Obama's home state. A state that has more registered democrats and has a strong recent democratic voting record definetly fertile ground for them in any other year.

Wisconsin and Washington:
I will keep these races as tossups but Im not yet prepared to give the republican candidates the advantage in states where the incumbents are still farely powerful. I do conceed that these races are tighter then they should be and that eithier Murray or Feingold could easily be defeated if the tides turn quickly in these races...


Version: 24

Most races at present time are tossups as polling has been up and down in many races between the two major party candidates.

Nevada:
From Lean Angle to Toss up Reid.
I will preface my statements first as,I am no staunch fan of Harry Reid in particuliar. However it is clear to me Sharron Angle's lead is shrinking fast. Her once solid double digit to high single digit leads are now down to around 3pts. Averaged with other polls she is down to an 8pt lead. At one point her polling average had also been in double digits. I believe this is a result of her extreme views being aired so vividly. One such view being her view and treatment of the my LGBT community. As a openly homosexual male I would be afraid of her being elected if I lived in Nevada. Her statements toward my community go beyond disapproval and into the hostile category. I in particuliar dont take kindly to her suggesting a quarantine of people carrying non publically contagious (sexually) transmitted illnesses such as HIV. I have friends in Nevada and they dont need to be quarantined and are not a "threat" to the general public because they are HIV positive. I also dont believe in gutting social services such as peoples Unemployment Benefits (I am unemployed at present). Nor do I believe in gutting the Department of Education and EPA. I dont feel there was a "government conspiracy" to force people into using floride toothpaste. However I do feel that its a senators job to promote a healthy economy via job creation or promotion of an environment that is job friendly. Somewhat contrary to Ms Angle's statement " it wouldnt be my job as senator to create jobs if I were senator" Yet she attacks Reid for Nevada job losses? Her general job statement will not be percieved well...imo.
I believe the closing in of Reid at such an early stage in the campaign cant be good news for Angle. Angle should be running away with this race based on Reid's negatives. Reid has not spent 1/4 of his war chest just yet, and is closing in. This could be percieved a sign that Angles public perception is not being recieved well based on her social positions and non-conventional views.

Michelle Bachmann(Rep MN) has nothing on Sharron Angle in terms of the label "out of the mainstream" extreme's.
I personally would be concerned for Nevada if this woman becomes senator.

Florida:
Crist as an Independent is currently polling stronger then I thought he would, considering his ties to Obama. Still early but I'm moving the state back into his column solidly.

Pennsylvania:
Tossup Toomey to Tossup Sestak. This race is a tossup in every sense of the word at the present time. I dont see anyone running away with it just yet. Pennsylvania is usually a battleground state. Sestak may still be more appealing for his impressive victory over Specter in the primary. Toomey would be wise to not underestimate him.

California:
As I suspected the SUSA poll may have been a fluke because the Rasmussen poll has Boxer up by 7. However with these two polls averaged its still a tossup. I do believe Boxer will pull away ever so slightly as both women begin their respective advertising in the state. They have not been advertising for the general election just yet up to this point. Boxer also has a record of closing and posting stronger in later polls and has in all three of her previous races





Version: 23

Most races at present time are tossups as polling has been up and down in many races between the two major party candidates.

Nevada:
From Lean Angle to Toss up Angle.
I will preface my statements first as,I am no staunch fan of Harry Reid in particuliar. However it is clear to me Sharron Angle's lead is shrinking fast. Her once solid double digit to high single digit leads are now down to around 3pts. Averaged with other polls she is down to an 8pt lead. At one point her polling average had also been in double digits. I believe this is a result of her extreme views being aired so vividly. One such view being her view and treatment of the my LGBT community. As a openly homosexual male I would be afraid of her being elected if I lived in Nevada. Her statements toward my community go beyond disapproval and into the hostile category. I in particuliar dont take kindly to her suggesting a quarantine of people carrying non publically contagious (sexually) transmitted illnesses such as HIV. I have friends in Nevada and they dont need to be quarantined and are not a "threat" to the general public because they are HIV positive. I also dont believe in gutting social services such as peoples Unemployment Benefits (I am unemployed at present). Nor do I believe in gutting the Department of Education and EPA. I dont feel there was a "government conspiracy" to force people into using floride toothpaste. However I do feel that its a senators job to promote a healthy economy via job creation or promotion of an environment that is job friendly. Somewhat contrary to Ms Angle's statement " it wouldnt be my job as senator to create jobs if I were senator" Yet she attacks Reid for Nevada job losses? Her general job statement will not be percieved well...imo.
I believe the closing in of Reid at such an early stage in the campaign cant be good news for Angle. Angle should be running away with this race based on Reid's negatives. Reid has not spent 1/4 of his war chest just yet, and is closing in. This could be percieved a sign that Angles public perception is not being recieved well based on her social positions and non-conventional views.

Michelle Bachmann(Rep MN) has nothing on Sharron Angle in terms of the label "out of the mainstream" extreme's.
I personally would be concerned for Nevada if this woman becomes senator.

Florida:
Crist as an Independent is currently polling stronger then I thought he would, considering his ties to Obama. Still early but I'm moving the state back into his column solidly.

Pennsylvania:
Tossup Toomey to Tossup Sestak. This race is a tossup in every sense of the word at the present time. I dont see anyone running away with it just yet. Pennsylvania is usually a battleground state. Sestak may still be more appealing for his impressive victory over Specter in the primary. Toomey would be wise to not underestimate him.

California:
As I suspected the SUSA poll may have been a fluke because the Rasmussen poll has Boxer up by 7. However with these two polls averaged its still a tossup. I do believe Boxer will pull away ever so slightly as both women begin their respective advertising in the state. They have not been advertising for the general election just yet up to this point. Boxer also has a record of closing and posting stronger in later polls and has in all three of her previous races



Version: 22

California to tossup Boxer based on current SUSA polling. I seriously doubt the validity of an actual Fiorina lead but am willing to conceed the race is tighter.

Interesting to note that neithier senatorial candidates have been running ads since Fiorina won her parties nomination. This could be seen as a bounce and remains to be seen if its a real polling trend.

I also studied the makeup of the participants in the SUSA poll and feel they did not accurately poll the Los Angeles or San Francisco Bay area. I also am lead to wonder if the latino and african american communities was accurately polled.

These communities will no doubt support Boxer and Jerry Brown overwhelmingly.


Version: 21

Change from previous map: Florida from Independent Crist to Republican Rubio.


Version: 20

Updates from previous versions:

Pennsylvania: From Democrat Sestak to Republican Toomey. Very narrowly. This will be a hard fought race.

Wisconsin: From Lean Feingold to Toss Up Feingold based on recent tight polling.

Washington: Lean Murray to Tossup Murray again based on tight polling.

The high unemployment rate and the lack luster response to the oil spill from the Obama administration is a drag on many of these races. Improvement in these issues is critical to democratic chances this fall. Yes races will be fought on local issues but people can not ignore these large national issues. Demographics and voter turnout will also be key in determining a winner.

(PS:) Sharron Angle is a lunatic and I really hope that Reid(as much as I dislike him) can beat her.


Version: 18

Update from last version:

Nevada: Although I still give Reid a good chance of pulling out an upset against Tea Party Queen Sharron Angle she is currently ahead in the polls so thus I will give her the state in the current version of my map. However her previous past positions I believe will come to haunt her in the fall campaign. She has already back pedaled and tried to be seen as more mainstream.

Florida: I believe Marco Rubio may have a razor thin edge at this moment in time but I havent written Crist off for dead this will be a tough campaign and I expect him to do well and possibly upseat Rubio in that race.


Version: 17

New Map based a little more in reality then my previous two scenarios.Notes on a few of the races from Tuesday.Party Nominees were decided in 4 races I was watching closely:

Arkansas: Blanche Lincoln strongely and bravely held out a challenge by liberal state Lt Governor Bill Halter. Unfortunately I still dont see how she is able to hold this seat this year and polling had both democrats losing to Boozman the republican nominee by double digits.

Iowa: While I believe multiple term GOP incumbent Senator Chuck Grassley will win by a comfortable margin I also expect this race to be closer then previously expected. Possible sleeper race that I believe Roxann Conlin will be a tougher opponent then many expect. Conlin is a tough attorney and has a pretty neutral to likeable public image statewide from my research. One recent poll had her only 8pts behind the multiple term incumbent in the perpetual battleground state.

Nevada: In a suprise I had not anticipated months ago, The nevada race of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid may just be competitive this fall. Why? The state nominated far right tea party favorite Sharron Angle as the Republican nominee. She has made such bold statements as being in favor of getting rid of various departments of education. Reid may be able to successfully paint her as out of the mainstream Nevada electorate. Nevada is not a far right state.rnThis race should be a cake walk for republicans but Reid may just luck out with a razor thin win as I also believe there is likely to be a down ballot independent that my siffon votes away from Angle.

California: The more moderate and electable candidate Campbell lost to former failed CEO Carly Fiorina (aka Demon sheep woman for her respectively titled ad against campbell) While the race will still be somewhat competitive I bet Boxer is breathing a sigh of relief with Fiorina as her opponent in progressive california. Fiorina is pro-life, pro-gun and anti gun control and anti-gay marriage in a state where the republican party splits on the issue and democrats favor marriage rights. (Prop 8 narrowly passed) She is also against the idea of climate change and feels Boxer is out of step with California regarding global warming. Fiorina is also already being hit on her record at HP and the over 15,000 jobs lost and the many more outsourced to other countries.She was subsequently fired/forced to resign as CEO and many are coming out of the woodwork to speak out against her rein.

Fiorina has demostrated that she can be a bit of a loose cannon with various remarks that will not bode well in a race against Boxer. No apology tours are accepted in California. Once you misspeak your burned. This is not Connecticut.


Version: 16

As stated on my previous map...Heres the Best Case Landslide Scenario for Republicans at this time. Assuming a scenario in which everything went their way. Which will *not* likely happen in the fall!

Connecticut: The states ability to vote republican this year is questionable in a even in a republican landslide scenario. Even after Blumenthals multiple verbal blunders in the state he still maintains double digit leads at present day. So while this would assume everything went right for the republicans and a tidal wave of support went their way Connecticut might still hold out support based on present day polling.

California: Ive still listed it as a tossup even in a landslide scenario as the popular vote would still be close even if republicans are able to pick it up in the fall. 40% of the states electorate are registered democrats so the losing candidate would likely recieve at least 41% just from their base support. The republican would have to trounce the democrats with independents in order to reach a large plurality as Swartzenegger had. So this map might forsee an outcome in California in the range 52-48% win for the republican candidate Fiorina. Which I highly doubt will come to pass.


Version: 15

Best Case Landslide Scenario For the Democrats...This ofcourse will *not* happen but this is just the upward limitation of what a democratic lanslide win could yield if everything went their way. This would be under a tidal wind of good news for democrats and a split in republican ranks.My next map will be a best case scenario for republicans.


Version: 14

This is where I believe the races to be today if a vote were taken. Ofcourse many of these states still have yet to select a nominee, such as my home state. A nominee would effect the outcome in a few. California might toss Boxer out with the right republican for instance. Reid may be more competitive in Nevada if Angle is the nominee as she has run a pretty eratic campaign quite recently as has Fiorina here in California.


Version: 13

Updated California to reflect new polling.
However I am unsure as to the republican candidate in the slew of new polls out showing Boxer's lead increasing. Since California has yet to have secure a republican nominee this race truly is a tossup despite the polling out. I still believe the race could tighten with the right GOP nominee. Ms Boxer is still polling well below the 50% mark that a successful incumbent usually needs to be reelected.

Also have noticed that the Pennsylvania race has tightened up after Sestak won his parties nomination.

Florida Mr Rubio has seemed to take a slight albeit tight and narrow lead over Independent Florida Governor Charlie Crist.
I expect this race to be very interesting.


Version: 12

Back to a prediction map.

Connecticut: to a toss-up possibility for republicans in lew of the recent false statements of military service made by Richard Blumenthal the democrats candidate. I believe he should step down for the sake of his party. I would not trust him with my vote after such a lie.

Pennsylvania: moved back to democrats after the Sestak win. I admire Joe Sestaks story of service to his country as a decorated Admiral. I believe his service will play well in a state with a high veteran population. I also think he will put up more of a fight against Toomey then Specter would have. Toomey's social positions may not play well in the Philadelphia suburbs home to Joe Sestak and the swing districts of the state. Time will tell and we really will need to see polls within a few weeks to see where the race sits here.


Version: 11





Version: 10

Updating my map after developements in the race for Florida senate. Crist is running as an independent and is polling suprising well against Republican Marco Rubio and the weaker Kendrick Meek. Will he take it?...remains to be seen with such a split electorate in a battleground state I think he could. Recently polling has him up anywhere from 3-8pts.


Version: 9

Recent polling shows Republican Mark Kirk polling better then I expected in Illinois. Perhaps a result of his more moderate stances on social issues while maintaining fiscal conservative stances to keep the republican base on board. As is Republican Tom Campbell in my home state of California. Both races will be close eithier way and could tip the balance of the chamber.


Version: 7





Version: 5

Best Case Scenario for the republicans at this point.


Version: 4

Massachusetts should be a warning to any democrat incumbent who thinks they are "safe"


Polling out recently have not been very positive for many democratic incumbents with years of experience.

Some Key Races to Watch:


Very Likely Republican Pickups:

Nevada-No Brainer...Reid is the most vulnerable democratic incumbent. I have not seen a poll showing him competitive in many months, Unless somehow Sharron Angle is the nominee then its advantage Reid.

Arkansas- Blanche Lincoln hails from a state that has been trending republican despite it being Bill Clintons home state. Many in Arkansas are unhappy with her rubber stamping of the obama agenda.

Colorado- Polls showing republicans doing very well in a state that went to obama by 9 pts.

Delaware- Castle is known and very popular. Hunky Beau Biden has decided not to challenge him.

Ohio- Ever the competitive state. People are dissatisfied with Obama and the lack of job creation. The same could be said in Indiana where once safe Bayh is now vulnerable.

New Hampshire...A state where independents dominant a group that is running away from obama and his agenda or lack of one on new jobs.

Competitive Races or slight lean republican:

Missouri- Although I believe it will be leaning republican by november.

New York- Gillibrand is vulnerable if a moderate runs. IF she goes up against Pataki I say advantage Pataki who is the popular ex republican governer.

Pennsylvania- Specter is now vulnerable despite running against Toomey who at one point looked too conservative to win in a battleground state.

Illinois: The republicans have set their sites on the presidents home state. Rep Kirk is a moderate and could be very electable in the democratic state. After the fiasco that was Blago people are ready for new leadership even in Illinois!

Toss Ups:

California: Lean Boxer especially if Fiorina is the nominee.

Wisconsin: Another state that is traditionally a battleground state. It all depends on the popularity of the liberal Feingold in the state. Obama did very well here in 2008 Im not sure if that was situational or if the state is truly up for grabs. I will wait for more polling out of the state.

Indiana: Bayh should NOT be polling just a few points ahead or behind he -should- be up by double digits. This is just a sign of the toxic banner that is obama. Indiana has been traditionally a republican state in the past and has the demographics to flip faster then other states. Toss up republican is my call.---Now that Coats has announced he will challenge Bayh I am convinced this will turn into a toss up race.


Lean to Safe Democrat:
(If any democrat can safely be titled as such?)

New York: Schumer is safe for now.

Maryland: Milkulski is safe in a very blue state with years of experience first elected in 1986.

Connecticut: Blumenthal is the very popular state attorney general and leads by double digits in all polling out of CT.

Oregon:Ron Wyden is very popular and Oregon is still very liberal and receptive to Obama.Unemployment is not as bad in oregon as in other states.

Washington: Patty Murray soccer mom turned politician is still popular in liberal washington state. She is a classic liberal but is very skilled at running moderate campaigns and staying away from hot button issues.

At this point I do believe it is possible for republicans to win control of the senate.
I also believe if it is a tidal wave of 1994 porportions Nancy Pelosi could be retitled Minority Leader in the house which would thrill me!












Massachusetts should be a warning to any democrat incumbent who thinks they are "safe"
This is early on but the sense of a tidal wave is pretty clear.

Polling out recently have not been very positive for many democratic incumbents with years of experience.

Some Key Races to Watch:


Very Likely Republican Pickups:

Nevada-No Brainer...Reid is the most vulnerable democratic incumbent. I have not seen a poll showing him competitive in many months.

Arkansas- Blanche Lincoln hails from a state that has been trending republican despite it being Bill Clintons home state. Many in Arkansas are unhappy with her rubber stamping of the obama agenda.

Colorado- Polls showing republicans doing very well in a state that went to obama by 9 pts.

Delaware- Castle is known and very popular. Hunky Beau Biden has decided not to challenge him.

Ohio- Ever the competitive state. People are dissatisfied with Obama and the lack of job creation. The same could be said in Indiana where once safe Bayh is now vulnerable.

New Hampshire...A state where independents dominant a group that is running away from obama and his agenda or lack of one on new jobs.

Competitive Races or slight lean republican:

Missouri- Although I believe it will be leaning republican by november.

New York- Gillibrand is vulnerable if a moderate runs. IF she goes up against Pataki I say advantage Pataki who is the popular ex republican governer.

Pennsylvania- Specter is now vulnerable despite running against Toomey who at one point looked too conservative to win in a battleground state.

Illinois: The republicans have set their sites on the presidents home state. Rep Kirk is a moderate and could be very electable in the democratic state. After the fiasco that was Blago people are ready for new leadership even in Illinois!

Toss Ups:

California: Although I have it as a toss up only because I believe by november Boxer will be vulnerable It all depends on her challenger and the situation for democrats abroad. Boxer is running in a democratic state, but has always carried a liberal banner and is easily branded as such. She is one of the easiest politicians to tie to supporting obama and support of his failed agenda. She will also be running in a state where unemployment is at 13% or could be even higher come november. I call it a toss up where as others classify her as safe or lean democrat.

Wisconsin: Another state that is traditionally a battleground state. It all depends on the popularity of the liberal Feingold in the state. Obama did very well here in 2008 Im not sure if that was situational or if the state is truly up for grabs. I will wait for more polling out of the state. I definetly would not put if out of the realm of possibility if a republican such as Ryan ran.

Indiana: Bayh should NOT be polling just a few points ahead or behind he -should- be up by double digits. This is just a sign of the toxic banner that is obama. Indiana has been traditionally a republican state in the past and has the demographics to flip back to one before other states. The fact that massachusetts elected a republican means that yes Indiana is in play. Toss up republican is my call.


Lean to Safe Democrat:
(If any democrat can safely be titled as such?)

New York: Schumer is safe for now.

Maryland: Milkulski is safe in a very blue state with years of experience first elected in 1986.

Connecticut: Blumenthal is the very popular state attorney general and leads by double digits in all polling out of CT.

Oregon:Ron Wyden is very popular and Oregon is still very liberal and receptive to Obama.Unemployment is not as bad in oregon as in other states.

Washington: Patty Murray soccer mom turned politician is still popular in liberal washington state. She is a classic liberal but is very skilled at running moderate campaigns and staying away from hot button issues.

At this point I do believe it is possible for republicans to win control of the senate.
I also believe if it is a tidal wave of 1994 porportions Nancy Pelosi could be retitled Minority Leader in the house which would thrill me!

Massachusetts should be a warning to any democrat incumbent who thinks they are "safe"
This is early on but the sense of a tidal wave is pretty clear.

Polling out recently have not been very positive for many democratic incumbents with years of experience.

Some Key Races to Watch:


Very Likely Republican Pickups:

Nevada-No Brainer...Reid is the most vulnerable democratic incumbent. I have not seen a poll showing him competitive in many months.

Arkansas- Blanche Lincoln hails from a state that has been trending republican despite it being Bill Clintons home state. Many in Arkansas are unhappy with her rubber stamping of the obama agenda.

Colorado- Polls showing republicans doing very well in a state that went to obama by 9 pts.

Delaware- Castle is known and very popular. Hunky Beau Biden has decided not to challenge him.

Ohio- Ever the competitive state. People are dissatisfied with Obama and the lack of job creation. The same could be said in Indiana where once safe Bayh is now vulnerable.

New Hampshire...A state where independents dominant a group that is running away from obama and his agenda or lack of one on new jobs.

Competitive Races or slight lean republican:

Missouri- Although I believe it will be leaning republican by november.

New York- Gillibrand is vulnerable if a moderate runs. IF she goes up against Pataki I say advantage Pataki who is the popular ex republican governer.

Pennsylvania- Specter is now vulnerable despite running against Toomey who at one point looked too conservative to win in a battleground state.

Illinois: The republicans have set their sites on the presidents home state. Rep Kirk is a moderate and could be very electable in the democratic state. After the fiasco that was Blago people are ready for new leadership even in Illinois!

Toss Ups:

California: Although I have it as a toss up only because I believe by november Boxer will be vulnerable It all depends on her challenger and the situation for democrats abroad. Boxer is running in a democratic state, but has always carried a liberal banner and is easily branded as such. She is one of the easiest politicians to tie to supporting obama and support of his failed agenda. She will also be running in a state where unemployment is at 13% or could be even higher come november. I call it a toss up where as others classify her as safe or lean democrat.

Wisconsin: Another state that is traditionally a battleground state. It all depends on the popularity of the liberal Feingold in the state. Obama did very well here in 2008 Im not sure if that was situational or if the state is truly up for grabs. I will wait for more polling out of the state. I definetly would not put if out of the realm of possibility if a republican such as Ryan ran.

Indiana: Bayh should NOT be polling just a few points ahead or behind he -should- be up by double digits. This is just a sign of the toxic banner that is obama. Indiana has been traditionally a republican state in the past and has the demographics to flip back to one before other states. The fact that massachusetts elected a republican means that yes Indiana is in play. Toss up republican is my call.


Lean to Safe Democrat:
(If any democrat can safely be titled as such?)

New York: Schumer is safe for now.

Maryland: Milkulski is safe in a very blue state with years of experience first elected in 1986.

Connecticut: Blumenthal is the very popular state attorney general and leads by double digits in all polling out of CT.

Oregon:Ron Wyden is very popular and Oregon is still very liberal and receptive to Obama.Unemployment is not as bad in oregon as in other states.

Washington: Patty Murray soccer mom turned politician is still popular in liberal washington state. She is a classic liberal but is very skilled at running moderate campaigns and staying away from hot button issues.

At this point I do believe it is possible for republicans to win control of the senate.
I also believe if it is a tidal wave of 1994 porportions Nancy Pelosi could be retitled Minority Leader in the house which would thrill me!






























Version: 3



Polling out recently have not been very positive for many democratic incumbents with years of experience.

Some Key Races to Watch:


Very Likely Republican Pickups:

Nevada-No Brainer...Reid is the most vulnerable democratic incumbent. I have not seen a poll showing him competitive in many months. Unless somehow Sharron Angle is the nominee then its advantage Reid.

Arkansas- Blanche Lincoln hails from a state that has been trending republican despite it being Bill Clintons home state. Many in Arkansas are unhappy with her rubber stamping of the obama agenda.

Colorado- Polls showing republicans doing very well in a state that went to obama by 9 pts.

Delaware- Castle is known and very popular. Hunky Beau Biden has decided not to challenge him.

Ohio- Ever the competitive state. People are dissatisfied with Obama and the lack of job creation. The same could be said in Indiana where once safe Bayh is now vulnerable.

New Hampshire...A state where independents dominant a group that is running away from obama and his agenda or lack of one on new jobs.

Competitive Races or slight lean republican:

Missouri- Although I believe it will be leaning republican by november.

New York- Gillibrand is vulnerable if a moderate runs. IF she goes up against Pataki I say advantage Pataki who is the popular ex republican governer.

Pennsylvania- Specter is now vulnerable despite running against Toomey who at one point looked too conservative to win in a battleground state.

Illinois: The republicans have set their sites on the presidents home state. Rep Kirk is a moderate and could be very electable in the democratic state. After the fiasco that was Blago people are ready for new leadership even in Illinois!

Toss Ups:

California: Lean Boxer especially if Fiorina is the nominee.

Wisconsin: Another state that is traditionally a battleground state. It all depends on the popularity of the liberal Feingold in the state. Obama did very well here in 2008 Im not sure if that was situational or if the state is truly up for grabs. I will wait for more polling out of the state. I definetly would not put if out of the realm of possibility if a republican such as Ryan ran.

Indiana: Bayh should NOT be polling just a few points ahead or behind he -should- be up by double digits. This is just a sign of the toxic banner that is obama. Indiana has been traditionally a republican state in the past and has the demographics to flip back to one before other states. The fact that massachusetts elected a republican means that yes Indiana is in play. Toss up republican is my call.


Lean to Safe Democrat:
(If any democrat can safely be titled as such?)

New York: Schumer is safe for now.

Maryland: Milkulski is safe in a very blue state with years of experience first elected in 1986.

Connecticut: Blumenthal is the very popular state attorney general and leads by double digits in all polling out of CT.

Oregon:Ron Wyden is very popular and Oregon is still very liberal and receptive to Obama.Unemployment is not as bad in oregon as in other states.

Washington: Patty Murray soccer mom turned politician is still popular in liberal washington state. She is a classic liberal but is very skilled at running moderate campaigns and staying away from hot button issues.

At this point I do believe it is possible for republicans to win control of the senate.
I also believe if it is a tidal wave of 1994 porportions Nancy Pelosi could be retitled Minority Leader in the house which would thrill me just to get rid of her.












Version: 2

Update from last map- Many of these states are still toss up status as we are a year out from midterms. I feel with the recent retirement announcement by moderate democrat Byron Dorgan of North Dakota that state will safely go to the republican candidate due to its strong republican voting record in a year that favors their party.

Still aways out, but midterms always tend to favor the party out of power. I think the obamacare being rammed through congress on a strict party line vote will be a call to power in the base of the republican party. Obamas approval ratings are now under 50% as well.




Version: 1

Still aways out, but midterms always tend to favor the party out of power.


Version History


Member Comments
 By: Liberalrocks (D-CA) 2010-11-01 @ 17:49:38 prediction Map
This will likely be my final prediction of this cycle.

All comments encouraged and welcomed.

 By: Silent Hunter (D-GBR) 2010-11-01 @ 17:55:48 prediction Map
Good prediction. I think Boxer is pretty solid in CA. Reid is probably gone in NV; he's seen as too close to Obama in the state with the highest unemployment.

Time will tell if we're right.

 By: Liberalrocks (D-CA) 2010-11-01 @ 18:02:03 prediction Map
Agreed.

 By: dnul222 (D-MN) 2010-11-01 @ 18:17:17 prediction Map
I feel this is where I am today too...although I have slim hopes for Colorado, Nevada and Illinois all for different reasons...ground gme in Nevada for Reid, Illinois movement for DEM candidate for Governor maybe for Senattor, Colorado just plain toss up but western part of state is strong GOP this time...

peace to all who have made this a great forum this year...we will be back in two years to lament lack of progress in solving issues or commending GOP/Obama for a CLintonesque governence strategy and agreeing on things that will help us for the future...I pray for the second...but fear for the first...

ALoha!

 By: CR (--MO) 2010-11-01 @ 20:09:45 prediction Map
Here's hoping for just two more states!

 By: bonncaruso (D-DEU) 2010-11-02 @ 08:54:59 prediction Map
Our maps are almost absolutely identical.

 By: Liberalrocks (D-CA) 2010-11-10 @ 21:20:11 prediction Map
Well folks I was not able to be on much during the actual election but was suprised by a couple of states on my picks.

I was very pleased with my local results and to see Sharron Angle defeated so soundly.
I was so suprised to see Senator Reid get to a majority of the vote in Nevada.

 By: KS21 (I-KS) 2010-11-10 @ 21:43:51 prediction Map
Reid ran a great campaign, and Latinos were underestimated.

 By: Liberalrocks (D-CA) 2010-11-10 @ 22:18:01 prediction Map
Angle even lost her home city Reno and County Washoe by more then a few points. Now that has to be embarrassing.

Reid at 50% Wow who would have thought!
Also glad to see that nut Ken Buck lose.

 By: CR (--MO) 2010-11-10 @ 23:40:46 prediction Map
It is embarrassing. The GOP establishment did little to nothing to help her and in fact some at the state level endorsed Reid. That will not be forgotten so easily. Sharron ended up under preforming with some Republicans and more voters that said they had not been following the race closely and world stay home came out and voted for Reid. But Dingy Harry ran a nasty campaign and that is just the way it is.

Still got plenty of victories overall despite our looses in Nevada, Colorado, and West Virginia.

Last Edit: 2010-11-10 @ 23:42:12

 By: Liberalrocks (D-CA) 2010-11-11 @ 00:03:29 prediction Map
She also underperformed in the rural counties. Under margins needed to carry the state. So any accusation of voter fraud or ballot stuffing could not hold up.

The GOP really blew this race by nominating her. She has no buisness in politics. If one can not censor their own comments or take interviews with the media they really have no buisness as a public servant imo.


 By: CR (--MO) 2010-11-11 @ 00:23:04 prediction Map
The people choose her and she was cast aside by the political class as "unworthy." I have my own opinions about Sharron but everyone has the right to run for office. The elites in the GOP did not see it that way and Reid was a very powerful incumbent to challenge. But that's okay. The race is done. Let Reid be the face of the Senate Democrats, makes our job easier imo.

Perhaps Governor Brian Sandoval will have better luck in 2016 :)

 By: Liberalrocks (D-CA) 2010-11-11 @ 01:22:17 prediction Map
Reid was powerful but extremely vulnerable. Just look at his poll numbers from last summer.

There's no denying that this race was forfeited the minute Angle was nominated~!

 By: CR (--MO) 2010-11-11 @ 23:26:15 prediction Map
Didn't have to be that way with or without Angle but that is just the way it was.

 By: KS21 (I-KS) 2010-11-12 @ 08:07:53 prediction Map
Angle cost Republicans this race.

 By: MilesC56 (I-VA) 2010-11-12 @ 09:33:27 prediction Map
Reid had a lot of guts to even go for reelection. He knew by passing the stimulus he'd have to to pay a heavy political price back home, but I'm glad it worked out for Reid in the end.

 By: KS21 (I-KS) 2010-11-12 @ 09:51:03 prediction Map
I am too, as much as I dislike him.

 By: CR (--MO) 2010-11-12 @ 20:15:33 prediction Map
Perhaps Brian Sandoval can put an end to Harry once and for all in 2016.

 By: Liberalrocks (D-CA) 2010-11-12 @ 23:10:06 prediction Map
Harry may very well decide to retire then. With his age this may be his last term. However if Ensign couldn't do it and now Angle I think he is more powerful then people realize.

 By: MilesC56 (I-VA) 2010-11-13 @ 01:43:20 prediction Map
I hope Rory Reid gets his dad's seat in 2016.

 By: CR (--MO) 2010-11-13 @ 02:10:52 prediction Map
Gag, I dislike dynasties.

 By: bonncaruso (D-DEU) 2010-11-14 @ 03:47:18 prediction Map
I have some catching up to do here:

CR wrote:

"It is embarrassing. The GOP establishment did little to nothing to help her and in fact some at the state level endorsed Reid. That will not be forgotten so easily. Sharron ended up under preforming with some Republicans and more voters that said they had not been following the race closely and world stay home came out and voted for Reid. But Dingy Harry ran a nasty campaign and that is just the way it is."

Those republicans who defected from Angle did so because they knew that she is absolutely batshit crazy. It says a hell of a lot when members of your own party refused to support the nominated candidate in the face of a massive wave FOR your party and especially concerning the seat that would put the current Senate Majority Leader out of business. You are right: people will not forget it, namely, respected republicans who feel burned by Sarah Palin for supporting such an obviously unqualified whacko. And Harry did not run as nasty a campaign as you think, not one bit more nasty than Angle did. But he used her own words against her, and she deserved it. I personally think that the GOP in NV did your party a favor by not allowing Angle, Buck or O'Donell to get a chance for the world to see who absolutely klingon they are.

And this also proves that NV will be tough territory for the GOP in a Prez election in 2012.

Last Edit: 2010-11-14 @ 03:49:02

 By: KS21 (I-KS) 2010-11-14 @ 09:06:40 prediction Map
"Gag, I dislike dynasties."

If I remember correctly, you voted for Roy Blunt.

 By: CR (--MO) 2010-11-14 @ 14:35:00 prediction Map
Nevada is always tough ground for presidential races Bonn. But keep in mind, while Angle lost there, we did keep the governorship were Brian Sandoval won comfortably against Reid's son. I think that Nevada in 2012 will be all about the presidential race and we can't know much about that until the GOP selects a nominee.

As to Angle herself, yes she did make a lot of strange remarks. I said so during the campaign. The fact that Reid had to struggle against her says a lot too. I don't think that the GOP there did us any favors. Undermining party unity is never good. And it was principally the Tea Party Express that pushed Angle along with Palin, DeMint, and many other conservative groups. Reid proved he could kill Lowden in the primaries and Tarkanian came in third.

So the race is what it is. Maybe Governor Sandoval can put an end to Reid in 2016.

Yes KS I dislike dynasties. But I took the Blunt dynasty over the Carnahan one so not much choice.

 By: Liberalrocks (D-CA) 2010-11-14 @ 17:02:34 prediction Map
"As to Angle herself, yes she did make a lot of strange remarks. I said so during the campaign."

What an understatement!

 By: Liberalrocks (D-CA) 2010-11-14 @ 17:08:34 prediction Map
Bonn is correct all Harry Reid did was use Angle's direct quotes against her. All are completely available to reference and are on record. Many she has even said on film. So there were no distortions.

Angle on the other hand decided to race bait in an attempt to drive up her caucasian base. What back fired was a larger then expected Hispanic turnout. Not only did she lose Las Vegas (Clark county) decisively, she also lost her home city of Reno and Washoe County by more then a few points. That is truely embarrasing.
People were disgusted with those race baiting ads in addition to viewing her as out of the mainstream and too extreme. People proably also noted that she rarely did interviews which Reid challenged.

Last Edit: 2010-11-14 @ 17:12:32

 By: KS21 (I-KS) 2010-11-18 @ 07:58:48 prediction Map
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/11/17/extra_bonus_quote_of_the_day.html

 By: Liberalrocks (D-CA) 2010-11-19 @ 15:25:13 prediction Map
Well this appears to be the appropriate time for my exit remarks on this election cycle. As I have noted the departure of two of my fellow respected posters.

I have enjoyed chatting with and making additional friends on the forum this year. In addition to familiar names whom I have developed much respect for. While not entirely happy with many of the results there were several victories that have left me personally satisfied this cycle. I was happy with election results in my home state and the Pacific region of the country. In addition to tea party candidates who I felt were far too extreme to hold office being defeated in their respective senate bids in DE,CO,NV,AK.

I did not have as much personally invested feelings in many of these races which was a different perspective for me. 2012 may be a different story depending on whom the parties nominate for their candidate. I hope I am able to chat with many of you then and that this forum remains open as it has for the last few election cycles.

I will personally say goodbye to friends who I have chatted and debated a lot and have grown to respect. Doniki80, Faye, ConservRep, Colin, Miles, KS21, Albaleman, Nkpatel,Dnul, Liberallover and a few other prominent posters.
These posters seem to have given the most thoughtful insight this year and were more then fully engaged in this process. When I was at a loss I often looked to their views for much of my personal analysis.

I will infact miss the suspenseful lead up to the election that engulfs the forum each year. However understanding politics as I do the race is never truly over, just further out perhaps. 2012 has already begun for the republicans as it had for the democrats in 2006/7.

With this said, I leave you my friends.
Best Wishes for a better economy and future for all of America! Together We Will Achieve This.

Brandon
aka Liberalrocks.

Last Edit: 2010-11-19 @ 15:28:14

 By: CR (--MO) 2010-11-19 @ 19:56:57 prediction Map
Best wishes good friend and see you in 2011 Brandon!

 By: KS21 (I-KS) 2010-11-19 @ 20:32:10 prediction Map
Best wishes, LR!!!!!!

 By: KS21 (I-KS) 2010-11-23 @ 16:22:56 prediction Map
Did you just get a forum account?

 By: Liberalrocks (D-CA) 2010-11-23 @ 21:20:57 prediction Map
Yes you all can find me over on the forum! Im a newbie, but I suppose you gotta start somewhere.


User's Predictions

Prediction Score States Percent Total Accuracy Ver #D Rank#Pred
P 2024 President /56 /56 /112 % pie 246
P 2022 Senate 34/35 26/35 60/70 85.7% pie 1 4 48T305
P 2022 Governor 32/36 27/36 59/72 81.9% pie 1 4 88T272
P 2020 President 50/56 36/56 86/112 76.8% pie 9 6 529T684
P 2020 Senate 29/35 19/35 48/70 68.6% pie 1 4 337T423
P 2020 Governor 11/11 7/11 18/22 81.8% pie 1 5 51T293
P 2018 Senate 30/35 17/35 47/70 67.1% pie 5 0 334T483
P 2018 Governor 33/36 25/36 58/72 80.6% pie 3 2 56T372
P 2016 President 48/56 29/56 77/112 68.8% pie 14 0 369T678
P 2016 Senate 30/34 17/34 47/68 69.1% pie 7 0 213T362
P 2016 Governor 9/12 6/12 15/24 62.5% pie 5 0 47T279
P 2014 Senate 33/36 24/36 57/72 79.2% pie 60 0 82T382
P 2014 Governor 29/36 17/36 46/72 63.9% pie 53 0 123T300
P 2012 President 55/56 46/56 101/112 90.2% pie 97 1 77T760
P 2012 Senate 32/33 22/33 54/66 81.8% pie 48 0 40T343
P 2012 Governor 11/11 7/11 18/22 81.8% pie 12 0 24T228
P 2012 Rep Primary 44/52 26/52 70/104 67.3% pie 67 - 5T231
P 2010 Senate 34/37 25/37 59/74 79.7% pie 71 1 63T456
P 2010 Governor 35/37 21/37 56/74 75.7% pie 44 5 106T312
P 2008 President 51/56 42/56 93/112 83.0% pie 53 1 139T1,505
P 2008 Senate 31/33 15/33 46/66 69.7% pie 4 24 227T407
P 2008 Governor 8/11 5/11 13/22 59.1% pie 2 17 232T264
P 2008 Dem Primary 49/52 18/52 67/104 64.4% pie 24 - 23T271
P 2008 Rep Primary 33/49 16/49 49/98 50.0% pie 7 - 55T235
Aggregate Predictions 751/845 493/845 1244/1690 73.6% pie



Back to 2010 Senatorial Prediction Home - Predictions Home


Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved