Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Appling		32.9%
		65.5%
	Other	1.5%

Atkinson		35.4%
		62.8%
	Other	1.8%

Bacon		34.9%
		63.7%
	Other	1.3%

Baker		59.1%
		39.5%
	Other	1.4%

Baldwin		47.2%
		51.1%
	Other	1.7%

Banks		31.5%
		66.4%
	Other	2.1%

Barrow		31.8%
		64.6%
	Other	3.7%

Bartow		35.4%
		61.8%
	Other	2.8%

Ben Hill		46.2%
		52.1%
	Other	1.7%

Berrien		38.2%
		60.2%
	Other	1.6%

Bibb		51.3%
		47.2%
	Other	1.5%

Bleckley		25.3%
		73.7%
	Other	1.0%

Brantley		23.1%
		74.1%
	Other	2.8%

Brooks		51.1%
		47.3%
	Other	1.6%

Bryan		32.8%
		65.8%
	Other	1.4%

Bulloch		41.3%
		57.1%
	Other	1.6%

Burke		52.3%
		46.3%
	Other	1.4%

Butts		39.7%
		58.0%
	Other	2.3%

Calhoun		61.8%
		37.3%
	Other	1.0%

Camden		41.8%
		56.1%
	Other	2.1%

Candler		38.8%
		59.3%
	Other	1.8%

Carroll		33.2%
		64.4%
	Other	2.4%

Catoosa		35.6%
		62.6%
	Other	1.8%

Charlton		36.8%
		61.7%
	Other	1.6%

Chatham		54.1%
		44.6%
	Other	1.2%

Chattahoochee		59.6%
		39.4%
	Other	1.0%

Chattooga		42.7%
		54.7%
	Other	2.6%

Cherokee		28.1%
		68.6%
	Other	3.2%

Clarke		58.2%
		38.3%
	Other	3.6%

Clay		70.0%
		29.0%
	Other	1.0%

Clayton		69.6%
		27.8%
	Other	2.6%

Clinch		50.9%
		47.8%
	Other	1.4%

Cobb		44.4%
		52.1%
	Other	3.5%

Coffee		38.7%
		59.8%
	Other	1.5%

Colquitt		34.4%
		63.8%
	Other	1.8%

Columbia		31.7%
		67.1%
	Other	1.2%

Cook		45.1%
		52.9%
	Other	2.0%

Coweta		32.8%
		64.8%
	Other	2.4%

Crawford		39.5%
		59.0%
	Other	1.5%

Crisp		42.9%
		55.7%
	Other	1.5%

Dade		41.1%
		56.9%
	Other	2.1%

Dawson		25.8%
		70.7%
	Other	3.5%

Decatur		50.9%
		47.1%
	Other	1.9%

DeKalb		73.8%
		23.5%
	Other	2.8%

Dodge		33.1%
		65.4%
	Other	1.5%

Dooly		49.2%
		49.2%
	Other	1.6%

Dougherty		62.9%
		36.1%
	Other	1.0%

Douglas		39.5%
		58.1%
	Other	2.4%

Early		51.8%
		46.9%
	Other	1.4%

Echols		35.4%
		61.9%
	Other	2.7%

Effingham		31.4%
		67.1%
	Other	1.5%

Elbert		47.5%
		50.4%
	Other	2.1%

Emanuel		40.2%
		58.4%
	Other	1.5%

Evans		43.5%
		54.8%
	Other	1.7%

Fannin		33.8%
		63.2%
	Other	3.0%

Fayette		33.7%
		64.1%
	Other	2.2%

Floyd		38.1%
		59.2%
	Other	2.7%

Forsyth		21.9%
		74.9%
	Other	3.2%

Franklin		37.6%
		59.6%
	Other	2.8%

Fulton		62.5%
		35.0%
	Other	2.5%

Gilmer		31.8%
		65.7%
	Other	2.5%

Glascock		30.8%
		68.1%
	Other	1.1%

Glynn		36.2%
		62.5%
	Other	1.2%

Gordon		35.4%
		62.0%
	Other	2.6%

Grady		53.1%
		45.4%
	Other	1.5%

Greene		45.6%
		53.1%
	Other	1.4%

Gwinnett		36.7%
		59.8%
	Other	3.5%

Habersham		30.9%
		66.6%
	Other	2.5%

Hall		29.3%
		68.1%
	Other	2.6%

Hancock		78.6%
		20.0%
	Other	1.3%

Haralson		34.2%
		62.7%
	Other	3.1%

Harris		39.8%
		58.8%
	Other	1.4%

Hart		45.0%
		52.8%
	Other	2.2%

Heard		42.6%
		54.7%
	Other	2.7%

Henry		35.3%
		62.0%
	Other	2.7%

Houston		31.6%
		67.2%
	Other	1.2%

Irwin		40.0%
		59.0%
	Other	1.1%

Jackson		30.2%
		67.2%
	Other	2.7%

Jasper		38.6%
		59.1%
	Other	2.3%

Jeff Davis		32.6%
		65.7%
	Other	1.8%

Jefferson		55.7%
		43.0%
	Other	1.3%

Jenkins		45.4%
		53.4%
	Other	1.2%

Johnson		31.8%
		66.8%
	Other	1.4%

Jones		38.3%
		60.2%
	Other	1.5%

Lamar		44.6%
		53.2%
	Other	2.2%

Lanier		47.6%
		50.7%
	Other	1.8%

Laurens		38.6%
		60.0%
	Other	1.4%

Lee		32.5%
		66.2%
	Other	1.3%

Liberty		57.9%
		40.2%
	Other	1.9%

Lincoln		44.3%
		54.5%
	Other	1.2%

Long		42.8%
		55.7%
	Other	1.6%

Lowndes		45.9%
		52.6%
	Other	1.5%

Lumpkin		31.7%
		64.8%
	Other	3.6%

McDuffie		42.3%
		56.4%
	Other	1.3%

McIntosh		55.7%
		42.7%
	Other	1.6%

Macon		60.8%
		38.0%
	Other	1.2%

Madison		28.1%
		68.9%
	Other	3.0%

Marion		50.6%
		47.3%
	Other	2.0%

Meriwether		51.3%
		46.9%
	Other	1.8%

Miller		45.1%
		53.5%
	Other	1.4%

Mitchell		55.7%
		43.1%
	Other	1.2%

Monroe		37.3%
		60.9%
	Other	1.8%

Montgomery		31.2%
		67.3%
	Other	1.6%

Morgan		37.9%
		59.8%
	Other	2.3%

Murray		34.4%
		62.4%
	Other	3.2%

Muscogee		60.8%
		37.9%
	Other	1.3%

Newton		40.6%
		56.6%
	Other	2.8%

Oconee		31.5%
		66.0%
	Other	2.5%

Oglethorpe		37.6%
		59.3%
	Other	3.1%

Paulding		29.8%
		67.4%
	Other	2.7%

Peach		44.9%
		53.8%
	Other	1.4%

Pickens		30.2%
		66.9%
	Other	2.8%

Pierce		23.7%
		75.4%
	Other	0.9%

Pike		29.8%
		68.2%
	Other	2.1%

Polk		38.6%
		58.7%
	Other	2.6%

Pulaski		33.2%
		65.9%
	Other	0.9%

Putnam		38.8%
		59.4%
	Other	1.8%

Quitman		70.8%
		25.6%
	Other	3.7%

Rabun		41.9%
		55.9%
	Other	2.1%

Randolph		64.2%
		34.4%
	Other	1.4%

Richmond		61.0%
		37.7%
	Other	1.3%

Rockdale		39.7%
		57.0%
	Other	3.3%

Schley		37.6%
		60.4%
	Other	2.0%

Screven		46.2%
		52.5%
	Other	1.2%

Seminole		47.9%
		49.5%
	Other	2.6%

Spalding		37.4%
		60.7%
	Other	1.9%

Stephens		40.1%
		58.0%
	Other	1.9%

Stewart		67.6%
		31.2%
	Other	1.2%

Sumter		55.2%
		43.2%
	Other	1.6%

Talbot		67.3%
		31.4%
	Other	1.3%

Taliaferro		68.4%
		30.7%
	Other	0.9%

Tattnall		35.8%
		63.0%
	Other	1.2%

Taylor		44.7%
		53.0%
	Other	2.3%

Telfair		40.3%
		58.6%
	Other	1.1%

Terrell		54.2%
		45.1%
	Other	0.7%

Thomas		45.1%
		53.3%
	Other	1.7%

Tift		36.5%
		62.0%
	Other	1.5%

Toombs		30.2%
		68.3%
	Other	1.5%

Towns		41.8%
		56.3%
	Other	1.9%

Treutlen		39.4%
		59.0%
	Other	1.5%

Troup		37.9%
		60.5%
	Other	1.5%

Turner		42.4%
		56.5%
	Other	1.1%

Twiggs		50.0%
		48.0%
	Other	1.9%

Union		37.4%
		60.4%
	Other	2.2%

Upson		41.4%
		57.1%
	Other	1.6%

Walker		36.2%
		61.5%
	Other	2.2%

Walton		30.5%
		66.8%
	Other	2.8%

Ware		32.2%
		66.7%
	Other	1.1%

Warren		56.1%
		42.3%
	Other	1.6%

Washington		49.4%
		49.4%
	Other	1.3%

Wayne		36.1%
		62.5%
	Other	1.5%

Webster		50.1%
		48.8%
	Other	1.1%

Wheeler		40.5%
		59.1%
	Other	0.4%

White		34.1%
		63.7%
	Other	2.2%

Whitfield		28.6%
		69.4%
	Other	2.0%

Wilcox		36.5%
		62.4%
	Other	1.1%

Wilkes		52.1%
		46.4%
	Other	1.5%

Wilkinson		51.2%
		47.4%
	Other	1.4%

Worth		38.1%
		60.4%
	Other	1.6%

National DataGraph for 2002 - Georgia Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved