Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adams	Bayh	62.7%
	Pearson	36.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Allen	Bayh	59.9%
	Pearson	38.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Bartholomew	Bayh	61.0%
	Pearson	38.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Benton	Bayh	57.4%
	Pearson	40.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Blackford	Bayh	66.7%
	Pearson	32.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Boone	Bayh	50.4%
	Pearson	49.2%
		0.0%
	Other	0.3%

Brown	Bayh	64.6%
	Pearson	34.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Carroll	Bayh	58.3%
	Pearson	41.2%
		0.0%
	Other	0.5%

Cass	Bayh	56.9%
	Pearson	42.8%
		0.0%
	Other	0.3%

Clark	Bayh	71.5%
	Pearson	28.2%
		0.0%
	Other	0.4%

Clay	Bayh	66.9%
	Pearson	32.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Clinton	Bayh	44.1%
	Pearson	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	0.7%

Crawford	Bayh	62.8%
	Pearson	36.9%
		0.0%
	Other	0.3%

Daviess	Bayh	56.1%
	Pearson	43.3%
		0.0%
	Other	0.6%

Dearborn	Bayh	54.7%
	Pearson	44.5%
		0.0%
	Other	0.7%

Decatur	Bayh	62.0%
	Pearson	36.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

DeKalb	Bayh	54.1%
	Pearson	45.5%
		0.0%
	Other	0.4%

Delaware	Bayh	66.1%
	Pearson	32.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Dubois	Bayh	65.6%
	Pearson	34.2%
		0.0%
	Other	0.2%

Elkhart	Bayh	54.8%
	Pearson	43.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Fayette	Bayh	62.1%
	Pearson	37.5%
		0.0%
	Other	0.4%

Floyd	Bayh	68.0%
	Pearson	31.8%
		0.0%
	Other	0.2%

Fountain	Bayh	59.3%
	Pearson	38.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Franklin	Bayh	59.3%
	Pearson	38.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Fulton	Bayh	57.8%
	Pearson	40.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Gibson	Bayh	69.5%
	Pearson	29.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Grant	Bayh	59.4%
	Pearson	39.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Greene	Bayh	65.7%
	Pearson	33.9%
		0.0%
	Other	0.4%

Hamilton	Bayh	50.8%
	Pearson	48.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Hancock	Bayh	56.1%
	Pearson	42.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Harrison	Bayh	70.8%
	Pearson	27.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Hendricks	Bayh	50.9%
	Pearson	47.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Henry	Bayh	62.2%
	Pearson	36.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Howard	Bayh	60.1%
	Pearson	38.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Huntington	Bayh	55.1%
	Pearson	44.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Jackson	Bayh	61.0%
	Pearson	38.6%
		0.0%
	Other	0.3%

Jasper	Bayh	48.8%
	Pearson	49.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Jay	Bayh	62.2%
	Pearson	36.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Jefferson	Bayh	60.8%
	Pearson	38.5%
		0.0%
	Other	0.6%

Jennings	Bayh	55.3%
	Pearson	44.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.7%

Johnson	Bayh	55.6%
	Pearson	42.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Knox	Bayh	62.0%
	Pearson	36.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Kosciusko	Bayh	50.1%
	Pearson	48.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

LaGrange	Bayh	54.4%
	Pearson	45.5%
		0.0%
	Other	0.0%

Lake	Bayh	68.7%
	Pearson	30.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

LaPorte	Bayh	65.5%
	Pearson	32.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Lawrence	Bayh	58.1%
	Pearson	41.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Madison	Bayh	65.2%
	Pearson	33.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Marion	Bayh	61.5%
	Pearson	38.1%
		0.0%
	Other	0.5%

Marshall	Bayh	56.6%
	Pearson	43.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.4%

Martin	Bayh	63.4%
	Pearson	36.3%
		0.0%
	Other	0.4%

Miami	Bayh	57.1%
	Pearson	42.5%
		0.0%
	Other	0.4%

Monroe	Bayh	67.3%
	Pearson	30.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Montgomery	Bayh	54.7%
	Pearson	43.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Morgan	Bayh	50.3%
	Pearson	48.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Newton	Bayh	52.6%
	Pearson	45.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Noble	Bayh	57.8%
	Pearson	40.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Ohio	Bayh	59.0%
	Pearson	39.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Orange	Bayh	54.3%
	Pearson	44.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Owen	Bayh	62.2%
	Pearson	36.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Parke	Bayh	63.0%
	Pearson	35.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Perry	Bayh	69.0%
	Pearson	30.8%
		0.0%
	Other	0.3%

Pike	Bayh	67.5%
	Pearson	31.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Porter	Bayh	59.5%
	Pearson	38.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Posey	Bayh	69.0%
	Pearson	29.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Pulaski	Bayh	59.3%
	Pearson	40.4%
		0.0%
	Other	0.3%

Putnam	Bayh	58.6%
	Pearson	40.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Randolph	Bayh	58.7%
	Pearson	39.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Ripley	Bayh	56.7%
	Pearson	42.8%
		0.0%
	Other	0.5%

Rush	Bayh	59.8%
	Pearson	39.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

St. Joseph	Bayh	70.3%
	Pearson	29.4%
		0.0%
	Other	0.3%

Scott	Bayh	69.9%
	Pearson	29.6%
		0.0%
	Other	0.4%

Shelby	Bayh	59.1%
	Pearson	40.1%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Spencer	Bayh	61.5%
	Pearson	38.4%
		0.0%
	Other	0.1%

Starke	Bayh	64.7%
	Pearson	34.7%
		0.0%
	Other	0.6%

Steuben	Bayh	56.6%
	Pearson	42.9%
		0.0%
	Other	0.5%

Sullivan	Bayh	74.6%
	Pearson	24.8%
		0.0%
	Other	0.5%

Switzerland	Bayh	64.2%
	Pearson	35.4%
		0.0%
	Other	0.5%

Tippecanoe	Bayh	60.3%
	Pearson	37.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Tipton	Bayh	57.9%
	Pearson	41.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Union	Bayh	51.4%
	Pearson	47.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Vanderburgh	Bayh	71.0%
	Pearson	27.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Vermillion	Bayh	76.0%
	Pearson	22.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Vigo	Bayh	74.6%
	Pearson	24.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Wabash	Bayh	57.0%
	Pearson	42.7%
		0.0%
	Other	0.3%

Warren	Bayh	60.7%
	Pearson	37.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Warrick	Bayh	68.2%
	Pearson	30.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Washington	Bayh	60.7%
	Pearson	38.7%
		0.0%
	Other	0.6%

Wayne	Bayh	57.1%
	Pearson	41.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Wells	Bayh	56.0%
	Pearson	42.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

White	Bayh	59.1%
	Pearson	39.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Whitley	Bayh	57.5%
	Pearson	40.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

National DataGraph for 1992 - Indiana Results for 1992

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved