2008 Secretary of State General Election Data Graphs - North Carolina
by CountyData for this Contest was Contributed by on 2008-11-20Alamance | Marshall | 51.3% | |
Sawyer | 48.7% | |
Alexander | Marshall | 41.6% | |
Sawyer | 58.4% | |
Alleghany | Marshall | 55.3% | |
Sawyer | 44.7% | |
Anson | Marshall | 74.5% | |
Sawyer | 25.5% | |
Ashe | Marshall | 49.0% | |
Sawyer | 51.0% | |
Avery | Marshall | 32.5% | |
Sawyer | 67.5% | |
Beaufort | Marshall | 53.2% | |
Sawyer | 46.8% | |
Bertie | Marshall | 77.3% | |
Sawyer | 22.7% | |
Bladen | Marshall | 70.3% | |
Sawyer | 29.7% | |
Brunswick | Marshall | 49.0% | |
Sawyer | 51.0% | |
Buncombe | Marshall | 60.3% | |
Sawyer | 39.7% | |
Burke | Marshall | 50.5% | |
Sawyer | 49.5% | |
Cabarrus | Marshall | 46.3% | |
Sawyer | 53.7% | |
Caldwell | Marshall | 44.3% | |
Sawyer | 55.7% | |
Camden | Marshall | 46.7% | |
Sawyer | 53.3% | |
Carteret | Marshall | 43.0% | |
Sawyer | 57.0% | |
Caswell | Marshall | 62.0% | |
Sawyer | 38.0% | |
Catawba | Marshall | 43.4% | |
Sawyer | 56.6% | |
Chatham | Marshall | 62.1% | |
Sawyer | 37.9% | |
Cherokee | Marshall | 40.7% | |
Sawyer | 59.3% | |
Chowan | Marshall | 60.8% | |
Sawyer | 39.2% | |
Clay | Marshall | 40.0% | |
Sawyer | 60.0% | |
Cleveland | Marshall | 52.3% | |
Sawyer | 47.7% | |
Columbus | Marshall | 67.5% | |
Sawyer | 32.5% | |
Craven | Marshall | 51.1% | |
Sawyer | 48.9% | |
Cumberland | Marshall | 66.2% | |
Sawyer | 33.8% | |
Currituck | Marshall | 42.6% | |
Sawyer | 57.4% | |
Dare | Marshall | 52.3% | |
Sawyer | 47.7% | |
Davidson | Marshall | 40.6% | |
Sawyer | 59.4% | |
Davie | Marshall | 36.7% | |
Sawyer | 63.3% | |
Duplin | Marshall | 60.8% | |
Sawyer | 39.2% | |
Durham | Marshall | 78.3% | |
Sawyer | 21.7% | |
Edgecombe | Marshall | 76.6% | |
Sawyer | 23.4% | |
Forsyth | Marshall | 58.8% | |
Sawyer | 41.2% | |
Franklin | Marshall | 61.3% | |
Sawyer | 38.7% | |
Gaston | Marshall | 44.7% | |
Sawyer | 55.3% | |
Gates | Marshall | 61.4% | |
Sawyer | 38.6% | |
Graham | Marshall | 43.0% | |
Sawyer | 57.0% | |
Granville | Marshall | 65.9% | |
Sawyer | 34.1% | |
Greene | Marshall | 63.0% | |
Sawyer | 37.0% | |
Guilford | Marshall | 62.1% | |
Sawyer | 37.9% | |
Halifax | Marshall | 74.9% | |
Sawyer | 25.1% | |
Harnett | Marshall | 58.0% | |
Sawyer | 42.0% | |
Haywood | Marshall | 55.3% | |
Sawyer | 44.7% | |
Henderson | Marshall | 42.3% | |
Sawyer | 57.7% | |
Hertford | Marshall | 79.0% | |
Sawyer | 21.0% | |
Hoke | Marshall | 67.7% | |
Sawyer | 32.3% | |
Hyde | Marshall | 68.3% | |
Sawyer | 31.7% | |
Iredell | Marshall | 43.2% | |
Sawyer | 56.8% | |
Jackson | Marshall | 58.8% | |
Sawyer | 41.2% | |
Johnston | Marshall | 51.8% | |
Sawyer | 48.2% | |
Jones | Marshall | 58.3% | |
Sawyer | 41.7% | |
Lee | Marshall | 62.3% | |
Sawyer | 37.7% | |
Lenoir | Marshall | 61.9% | |
Sawyer | 38.1% | |
Lincoln | Marshall | 42.4% | |
Sawyer | 57.6% | |
McDowell | Marshall | 45.9% | |
Sawyer | 54.1% | |
Macon | Marshall | 46.5% | |
Sawyer | 53.5% | |
Madison | Marshall | 56.6% | |
Sawyer | 43.4% | |
Martin | Marshall | 70.3% | |
Sawyer | 29.7% | |
Mecklenburg | Marshall | 62.6% | |
Sawyer | 37.4% | |
Mitchell | Marshall | 33.1% | |
Sawyer | 66.9% | |
Montgomery | Marshall | 56.0% | |
Sawyer | 44.0% | |
Moore | Marshall | 45.3% | |
Sawyer | 54.7% | |
Nash | Marshall | 60.6% | |
Sawyer | 39.4% | |
New Hanover | Marshall | 53.4% | |
Sawyer | 46.6% | |
Northampton | Marshall | 76.7% | |
Sawyer | 23.3% | |
Onslow | Marshall | 48.0% | |
Sawyer | 52.0% | |
Orange | Marshall | 73.6% | |
Sawyer | 26.4% | |
Pamlico | Marshall | 53.7% | |
Sawyer | 46.3% | |
Pasquotank | Marshall | 64.7% | |
Sawyer | 35.3% | |
Pender | Marshall | 48.8% | |
Sawyer | 51.2% | |
Perquimans | Marshall | 53.0% | |
Sawyer | 47.0% | |
Person | Marshall | 61.6% | |
Sawyer | 38.4% | |
Pitt | Marshall | 61.5% | |
Sawyer | 38.5% | |
Polk | Marshall | 48.8% | |
Sawyer | 51.2% | |
Randolph | Marshall | 35.9% | |
Sawyer | 64.1% | |
Richmond | Marshall | 67.5% | |
Sawyer | 32.5% | |
Robeson | Marshall | 74.3% | |
Sawyer | 25.7% | |
Rockingham | Marshall | 53.4% | |
Sawyer | 46.6% | |
Rowan | Marshall | 47.0% | |
Sawyer | 53.0% | |
Rutherford | Marshall | 47.2% | |
Sawyer | 52.8% | |
Sampson | Marshall | 59.1% | |
Sawyer | 40.9% | |
Scotland | Marshall | 68.5% | |
Sawyer | 31.5% | |
Stanly | Marshall | 42.3% | |
Sawyer | 57.7% | |
Stokes | Marshall | 42.2% | |
Sawyer | 57.8% | |
Surry | Marshall | 47.9% | |
Sawyer | 52.1% | |
Swain | Marshall | 57.9% | |
Sawyer | 42.1% | |
Transylvania | Marshall | 48.8% | |
Sawyer | 51.2% | |
Tyrrell | Marshall | 70.0% | |
Sawyer | 30.0% | |
Union | Marshall | 40.0% | |
Sawyer | 60.0% | |
Vance | Marshall | 76.1% | |
Sawyer | 23.9% | |
Wake | Marshall | 61.0% | |
Sawyer | 39.0% | |
Warren | Marshall | 78.2% | |
Sawyer | 21.8% | |
Washington | Marshall | 71.9% | |
Sawyer | 28.1% | |
Watauga | Marshall | 54.2% | |
Sawyer | 45.8% | |
Wayne | Marshall | 57.3% | |
Sawyer | 42.7% | |
Wilkes | Marshall | 41.0% | |
Sawyer | 59.0% | |
Wilson | Marshall | 63.5% | |
Sawyer | 36.5% | |
Yadkin | Marshall | 36.4% | |
Sawyer | 63.6% | |
Yancey | Marshall | 53.8% | |
Sawyer | 46.2% | |