Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adams	Mathern	20.6%
	Hoeven	76.7%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Barnes	Mathern	24.3%
	Hoeven	73.4%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Benson	Mathern	35.9%
	Hoeven	62.3%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Billings	Mathern	13.8%
	Hoeven	83.3%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Bottineau	Mathern	18.9%
	Hoeven	79.7%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Bowman	Mathern	15.7%
	Hoeven	81.8%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Burke	Mathern	14.6%
	Hoeven	83.7%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Burleigh	Mathern	20.1%
	Hoeven	77.7%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Cass	Mathern	27.7%
	Hoeven	70.3%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Cavalier	Mathern	18.9%
	Hoeven	79.8%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Dickey	Mathern	23.0%
	Hoeven	75.3%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Divide	Mathern	22.0%
	Hoeven	77.2%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Dunn	Mathern	19.9%
	Hoeven	77.4%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Eddy	Mathern	26.9%
	Hoeven	71.5%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Emmons	Mathern	21.9%
	Hoeven	75.8%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Foster	Mathern	18.9%
	Hoeven	79.3%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Golden Valley	Mathern	14.5%
	Hoeven	83.3%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Grand Forks	Mathern	23.8%
	Hoeven	74.1%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Grant	Mathern	20.3%
	Hoeven	77.5%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Griggs	Mathern	24.0%
	Hoeven	74.8%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Hettinger	Mathern	19.8%
	Hoeven	78.5%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Kidder	Mathern	25.4%
	Hoeven	71.8%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.8%

LaMoure	Mathern	28.7%
	Hoeven	68.2%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Logan	Mathern	23.9%
	Hoeven	74.1%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.0%

McHenry	Mathern	23.4%
	Hoeven	74.5%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.0%

McIntosh	Mathern	18.3%
	Hoeven	80.3%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.4%

McKenzie	Mathern	19.4%
	Hoeven	78.3%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.3%

McLean	Mathern	23.1%
	Hoeven	74.4%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Mercer	Mathern	21.6%
	Hoeven	76.0%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Morton	Mathern	23.0%
	Hoeven	74.6%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Mountrail	Mathern	30.3%
	Hoeven	66.2%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Nelson	Mathern	25.0%
	Hoeven	73.7%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Oliver	Mathern	20.3%
	Hoeven	76.7%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Pembina	Mathern	18.3%
	Hoeven	80.5%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Pierce	Mathern	21.5%
	Hoeven	77.0%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Ramsey	Mathern	21.7%
	Hoeven	76.9%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Ransom	Mathern	34.9%
	Hoeven	63.5%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Renville	Mathern	18.4%
	Hoeven	79.0%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Richland	Mathern	23.3%
	Hoeven	74.7%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Rolette	Mathern	57.7%
	Hoeven	40.2%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Sargent	Mathern	33.6%
	Hoeven	65.3%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Sheridan	Mathern	18.4%
	Hoeven	79.2%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Sioux	Mathern	47.6%
	Hoeven	50.2%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Slope	Mathern	15.5%
	Hoeven	80.9%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Stark	Mathern	17.7%
	Hoeven	80.3%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Steele	Mathern	35.5%
	Hoeven	63.3%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Stutsman	Mathern	22.2%
	Hoeven	75.8%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Towner	Mathern	24.9%
	Hoeven	72.7%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Traill	Mathern	25.9%
	Hoeven	72.9%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Walsh	Mathern	19.7%
	Hoeven	79.2%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Ward	Mathern	18.1%
	Hoeven	79.8%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Wells	Mathern	21.2%
	Hoeven	76.5%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Williams	Mathern	15.8%
	Hoeven	82.4%
	Boyer	0.0%
	Other	1.9%

National DataGraph for 2008 - North Dakota Results for 2008

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved