Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-07-24

Map

Map

Adams	Schoettler	58.9%
	Sargent	40.1%
	Other	1.0%

Alamosa	Schoettler	54.3%
	Sargent	44.2%
	Other	1.5%

Arapahoe	Schoettler	44.2%
	Sargent	54.9%
	Other	0.9%

Archuleta	Schoettler	38.6%
	Sargent	60.0%
	Other	1.4%

Baca	Schoettler	48.7%
	Sargent	50.4%
	Other	0.9%

Bent	Schoettler	55.7%
	Sargent	43.4%
	Other	0.9%

Boulder	Schoettler	54.9%
	Sargent	44.2%
	Other	0.9%

Chaffee	Schoettler	47.7%
	Sargent	51.3%
	Other	1.0%

Cheyenne	Schoettler	39.4%
	Sargent	59.6%
	Other	1.0%

Clear Creek	Schoettler	50.5%
	Sargent	48.3%
	Other	1.2%

Conejos	Schoettler	55.8%
	Sargent	43.1%
	Other	1.1%

Costilla	Schoettler	72.6%
	Sargent	26.5%
	Other	1.0%

Crowley	Schoettler	51.6%
	Sargent	47.8%
	Other	0.5%

Custer	Schoettler	36.8%
	Sargent	61.9%
	Other	1.3%

Delta	Schoettler	46.3%
	Sargent	52.4%
	Other	1.3%

Denver	Schoettler	65.0%
	Sargent	34.0%
	Other	1.0%

Dolores	Schoettler	44.3%
	Sargent	53.7%
	Other	1.9%

Douglas	Schoettler	41.1%
	Sargent	58.3%
	Other	0.7%

Eagle	Schoettler	47.7%
	Sargent	51.5%
	Other	0.8%

Elbert	Schoettler	45.3%
	Sargent	54.0%
	Other	0.7%

El Paso	Schoettler	39.5%
	Sargent	59.7%
	Other	0.8%

Fremont	Schoettler	51.8%
	Sargent	46.9%
	Other	1.4%

Garfield	Schoettler	48.7%
	Sargent	50.4%
	Other	0.9%

Gilpin	Schoettler	55.1%
	Sargent	43.5%
	Other	1.5%

Grand	Schoettler	39.1%
	Sargent	60.2%
	Other	0.7%

Gunnison	Schoettler	48.6%
	Sargent	50.2%
	Other	1.2%

Hinsdale	Schoettler	35.5%
	Sargent	64.2%
	Other	0.3%

Huerfano	Schoettler	71.2%
	Sargent	28.1%
	Other	0.7%

Jackson	Schoettler	36.0%
	Sargent	63.0%
	Other	1.1%

Jefferson	Schoettler	47.4%
	Sargent	51.8%
	Other	0.9%

Kiowa	Schoettler	42.5%
	Sargent	56.9%
	Other	0.7%

Kit Carson	Schoettler	38.9%
	Sargent	60.1%
	Other	0.9%

Lake	Schoettler	66.9%
	Sargent	31.4%
	Other	1.8%

La Plata	Schoettler	45.1%
	Sargent	53.7%
	Other	1.2%

Larimer	Schoettler	47.7%
	Sargent	51.3%
	Other	1.0%

Las Animas	Schoettler	70.8%
	Sargent	27.4%
	Other	1.8%

Lincoln	Schoettler	42.6%
	Sargent	56.7%
	Other	0.7%

Logan	Schoettler	48.5%
	Sargent	50.2%
	Other	1.3%

Mesa	Schoettler	49.9%
	Sargent	49.0%
	Other	1.1%

Mineral	Schoettler	50.7%
	Sargent	49.0%
	Other	0.3%

Moffat	Schoettler	42.8%
	Sargent	55.7%
	Other	1.5%

Montezuma	Schoettler	40.7%
	Sargent	57.8%
	Other	1.5%

Montrose	Schoettler	47.5%
	Sargent	51.2%
	Other	1.4%

Morgan	Schoettler	43.6%
	Sargent	54.7%
	Other	1.7%

Otero	Schoettler	52.1%
	Sargent	47.0%
	Other	0.9%

Ouray	Schoettler	35.1%
	Sargent	64.2%
	Other	0.6%

Park	Schoettler	45.5%
	Sargent	52.6%
	Other	2.0%

Phillips	Schoettler	45.9%
	Sargent	53.4%
	Other	0.7%

Pitkin	Schoettler	54.2%
	Sargent	45.1%
	Other	0.7%

Prowers	Schoettler	47.8%
	Sargent	50.7%
	Other	1.5%

Pueblo	Schoettler	68.9%
	Sargent	30.0%
	Other	1.1%

Rio Blanco	Schoettler	40.6%
	Sargent	58.5%
	Other	0.9%

Rio Grande	Schoettler	42.9%
	Sargent	55.2%
	Other	1.9%

Routt	Schoettler	51.4%
	Sargent	47.5%
	Other	1.1%

Saguache	Schoettler	56.4%
	Sargent	42.9%
	Other	0.6%

San Juan	Schoettler	51.4%
	Sargent	48.3%
	Other	0.3%

San Miguel	Schoettler	60.0%
	Sargent	38.8%
	Other	1.2%

Sedgwick	Schoettler	43.4%
	Sargent	56.0%
	Other	0.7%

Summit	Schoettler	50.7%
	Sargent	48.4%
	Other	0.9%

Teller	Schoettler	41.0%
	Sargent	57.8%
	Other	1.2%

Washington	Schoettler	39.8%
	Sargent	59.2%
	Other	1.0%

Weld	Schoettler	47.4%
	Sargent	51.5%
	Other	1.1%

Yuma	Schoettler	45.8%
	Sargent	53.2%
	Other	0.9%

National DataGraph for 1986 - Colorado Results for 1986

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved