Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adams	Romer	63.5%
	Andrews	33.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Alamosa	Romer	66.8%
	Andrews	31.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Arapahoe	Romer	64.2%
	Andrews	33.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Archuleta	Romer	56.1%
	Andrews	41.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Baca	Romer	64.0%
	Andrews	34.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Bent	Romer	68.2%
	Andrews	29.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Boulder	Romer	71.5%
	Andrews	25.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Chaffee	Romer	61.5%
	Andrews	36.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Cheyenne	Romer	58.1%
	Andrews	39.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Clear Creek	Romer	63.4%
	Andrews	32.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Conejos	Romer	65.6%
	Andrews	32.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Costilla	Romer	76.0%
	Andrews	21.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Crowley	Romer	54.4%
	Andrews	43.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Custer	Romer	42.3%
	Andrews	55.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Delta	Romer	51.9%
	Andrews	44.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Denver	Romer	71.4%
	Andrews	25.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Dolores	Romer	66.9%
	Andrews	30.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Douglas	Romer	58.7%
	Andrews	38.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Eagle	Romer	71.0%
	Andrews	26.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Elbert	Romer	57.0%
	Andrews	40.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

El Paso	Romer	35.7%
	Andrews	62.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Fremont	Romer	44.9%
	Andrews	52.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Garfield	Romer	64.6%
	Andrews	33.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Gilpin	Romer	49.9%
	Andrews	42.9%
		0.0%
	Other	7.2%

Grand	Romer	60.9%
	Andrews	37.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Gunnison	Romer	68.3%
	Andrews	28.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Hinsdale	Romer	59.3%
	Andrews	40.2%
		0.0%
	Other	0.5%

Huerfano	Romer	62.8%
	Andrews	35.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Jackson	Romer	51.8%
	Andrews	46.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Jefferson	Romer	62.7%
	Andrews	34.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Kiowa	Romer	56.1%
	Andrews	43.7%
		0.0%
	Other	0.2%

Kit Carson	Romer	66.5%
	Andrews	32.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Lake	Romer	72.1%
	Andrews	24.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

La Plata	Romer	67.9%
	Andrews	29.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Larimer	Romer	66.3%
	Andrews	31.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Las Animas	Romer	67.3%
	Andrews	29.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Lincoln	Romer	61.6%
	Andrews	36.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Logan	Romer	68.7%
	Andrews	29.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Mesa	Romer	54.6%
	Andrews	43.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Mineral	Romer	74.5%
	Andrews	23.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Moffat	Romer	53.8%
	Andrews	41.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Montezuma	Romer	55.7%
	Andrews	41.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Montrose	Romer	55.9%
	Andrews	40.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Morgan	Romer	65.3%
	Andrews	32.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Otero	Romer	63.8%
	Andrews	34.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Ouray	Romer	53.8%
	Andrews	44.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Park	Romer	54.6%
	Andrews	40.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

Phillips	Romer	68.8%
	Andrews	29.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Pitkin	Romer	76.4%
	Andrews	20.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Prowers	Romer	68.9%
	Andrews	28.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Pueblo	Romer	68.5%
	Andrews	29.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Rio Blanco	Romer	55.8%
	Andrews	42.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Rio Grande	Romer	65.4%
	Andrews	33.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Routt	Romer	71.9%
	Andrews	25.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Saguache	Romer	66.6%
	Andrews	31.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

San Juan	Romer	53.4%
	Andrews	40.5%
		0.0%
	Other	6.1%

San Miguel	Romer	71.1%
	Andrews	23.1%
		0.0%
	Other	5.7%

Sedgwick	Romer	62.1%
	Andrews	36.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Summit	Romer	72.6%
	Andrews	24.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Teller	Romer	37.9%
	Andrews	58.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Washington	Romer	50.6%
	Andrews	47.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Weld	Romer	63.2%
	Andrews	35.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Yuma	Romer	64.8%
	Andrews	33.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

National DataGraph for 1990 - Colorado Results for 1990

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved