Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-01-25

Map

Map

Aitkin	Hammar	46.9%
	Bjornson	53.1%

Anoka	Hammar	57.2%
	Bjornson	42.8%

Becker	Hammar	49.8%
	Bjornson	50.2%

Beltrami	Hammar	48.6%
	Bjornson	51.4%

Benton	Hammar	47.3%
	Bjornson	52.7%

Big Stone	Hammar	54.7%
	Bjornson	45.3%

Blue Earth	Hammar	37.3%
	Bjornson	62.7%

Brown	Hammar	34.8%
	Bjornson	65.2%

Carlton	Hammar	60.5%
	Bjornson	39.5%

Carver	Hammar	31.7%
	Bjornson	68.3%

Cass	Hammar	42.2%
	Bjornson	57.8%

Chippewa	Hammar	46.3%
	Bjornson	53.7%

Chisago	Hammar	43.5%
	Bjornson	56.5%

Clay	Hammar	45.8%
	Bjornson	54.2%

Clearwater	Hammar	59.6%
	Bjornson	40.4%

Cook	Hammar	36.7%
	Bjornson	63.3%

Cottonwood	Hammar	34.1%
	Bjornson	65.9%

Crow Wing	Hammar	46.0%
	Bjornson	54.0%

Dakota	Hammar	53.3%
	Bjornson	46.7%

Dodge	Hammar	34.9%
	Bjornson	65.1%

Douglas	Hammar	44.6%
	Bjornson	55.4%

Faribault	Hammar	35.2%
	Bjornson	64.8%

Fillmore	Hammar	31.9%
	Bjornson	68.1%

Freeborn	Hammar	46.9%
	Bjornson	53.1%

Goodhue	Hammar	33.0%
	Bjornson	67.0%

Grant	Hammar	47.1%
	Bjornson	52.9%

Hennepin	Hammar	44.1%
	Bjornson	55.9%

Houston	Hammar	39.4%
	Bjornson	60.6%

Hubbard	Hammar	39.7%
	Bjornson	60.3%

Isanti	Hammar	49.5%
	Bjornson	50.5%

Itasca	Hammar	58.9%
	Bjornson	41.1%

Jackson	Hammar	49.0%
	Bjornson	51.0%

Kanabec	Hammar	45.6%
	Bjornson	54.4%

Kandiyohi	Hammar	52.0%
	Bjornson	48.0%

Kittson	Hammar	52.8%
	Bjornson	47.2%

Koochiching	Hammar	60.9%
	Bjornson	39.1%

Lac Qui Parle	Hammar	45.3%
	Bjornson	54.7%

Lake	Hammar	62.0%
	Bjornson	38.0%

Lake of the Woods	Hammar	54.8%
	Bjornson	45.2%

Le Sueur	Hammar	47.9%
	Bjornson	52.1%

Lincoln	Hammar	47.2%
	Bjornson	52.8%

Lyon	Hammar	42.4%
	Bjornson	57.6%

McLeod	Hammar	33.1%
	Bjornson	66.9%

Mahnomen	Hammar	62.3%
	Bjornson	37.7%

Marshall	Hammar	64.3%
	Bjornson	35.7%

Martin	Hammar	30.7%
	Bjornson	69.3%

Meeker	Hammar	40.2%
	Bjornson	59.8%

Mille Lacs	Hammar	42.9%
	Bjornson	57.1%

Morrison	Hammar	54.2%
	Bjornson	45.8%

Mower	Hammar	48.8%
	Bjornson	51.2%

Murray	Hammar	42.8%
	Bjornson	57.2%

Nicollet	Hammar	38.2%
	Bjornson	61.8%

Nobles	Hammar	45.9%
	Bjornson	54.1%

Norman	Hammar	51.6%
	Bjornson	48.4%

Olmsted	Hammar	37.6%
	Bjornson	62.4%

Otter Tail	Hammar	33.5%
	Bjornson	66.5%

Pennington	Hammar	56.0%
	Bjornson	44.0%

Pine	Hammar	52.6%
	Bjornson	47.4%

Pipestone	Hammar	39.4%
	Bjornson	60.6%

Polk	Hammar	55.5%
	Bjornson	44.5%

Pope	Hammar	44.7%
	Bjornson	55.3%

Ramsey	Hammar	55.0%
	Bjornson	45.0%

Red Lake	Hammar	68.6%
	Bjornson	31.4%

Redwood	Hammar	32.7%
	Bjornson	67.3%

Renville	Hammar	41.0%
	Bjornson	59.0%

Rice	Hammar	39.5%
	Bjornson	60.5%

Rock	Hammar	32.0%
	Bjornson	68.0%

Roseau	Hammar	56.4%
	Bjornson	43.6%

St. Louis	Hammar	61.4%
	Bjornson	38.6%

Scott	Hammar	53.5%
	Bjornson	46.5%

Sherburne	Hammar	43.4%
	Bjornson	56.6%

Sibley	Hammar	30.4%
	Bjornson	69.6%

Stearns	Hammar	47.1%
	Bjornson	52.9%

Steele	Hammar	35.5%
	Bjornson	64.5%

Stevens	Hammar	40.9%
	Bjornson	59.1%

Swift	Hammar	54.8%
	Bjornson	45.2%

Todd	Hammar	44.1%
	Bjornson	55.9%

Traverse	Hammar	54.8%
	Bjornson	45.2%

Wabasha	Hammar	37.7%
	Bjornson	62.3%

Wadena	Hammar	38.3%
	Bjornson	61.7%

Waseca	Hammar	32.5%
	Bjornson	67.5%

Washington	Hammar	47.7%
	Bjornson	52.3%

Watonwan	Hammar	38.8%
	Bjornson	61.2%

Wilkin	Hammar	46.0%
	Bjornson	54.0%

Winona	Hammar	42.4%
	Bjornson	57.6%

Wright	Hammar	42.6%
	Bjornson	57.4%

Yellow Medicine	Hammar	45.9%
	Bjornson	54.1%

National DataGraph for 1960 - Minnesota Results for 1960

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved