Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

1962 Gubernatorial General Election Data Graphs - Colorado

by County

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-08-01

Map

Map

Adams	McNichols	49.3%
	Love	49.8%
	Other	0.9%

Alamosa	McNichols	40.9%
	Love	58.5%
	Other	0.6%

Arapahoe	McNichols	36.3%
	Love	63.1%
	Other	0.6%

Archuleta	McNichols	52.6%
	Love	46.9%
	Other	0.5%

Baca	McNichols	32.6%
	Love	66.9%
	Other	0.5%

Bent	McNichols	44.0%
	Love	55.9%
	Other	0.1%

Boulder	McNichols	40.5%
	Love	59.1%
	Other	0.4%

Chaffee	McNichols	45.6%
	Love	54.3%
	Other	0.1%

Cheyenne	McNichols	37.5%
	Love	61.9%
	Other	0.5%

Clear Creek	McNichols	42.8%
	Love	56.8%
	Other	0.3%

Conejos	McNichols	43.4%
	Love	55.5%
	Other	1.1%

Costilla	McNichols	56.5%
	Love	42.6%
	Other	0.9%

Crowley	McNichols	36.3%
	Love	63.3%
	Other	0.4%

Custer	McNichols	28.5%
	Love	71.1%
	Other	0.4%

Delta	McNichols	36.3%
	Love	63.3%
	Other	0.3%

Denver	McNichols	49.4%
	Love	49.6%
	Other	1.0%

Dolores	McNichols	41.6%
	Love	57.6%
	Other	0.8%

Douglas	McNichols	30.6%
	Love	68.8%
	Other	0.5%

Eagle	McNichols	45.0%
	Love	54.6%
	Other	0.4%

Elbert	McNichols	29.6%
	Love	70.0%
	Other	0.3%

El Paso	McNichols	33.9%
	Love	65.7%
	Other	0.4%

Fremont	McNichols	36.3%
	Love	63.2%
	Other	0.5%

Garfield	McNichols	35.6%
	Love	64.0%
	Other	0.5%

Gilpin	McNichols	48.4%
	Love	51.4%
	Other	0.2%

Grand	McNichols	34.4%
	Love	65.1%
	Other	0.5%

Gunnison	McNichols	43.4%
	Love	56.6%

Hinsdale	McNichols	37.7%
	Love	62.3%

Huerfano	McNichols	59.4%
	Love	39.6%
	Other	1.0%

Jackson	McNichols	33.5%
	Love	65.9%
	Other	0.6%

Jefferson	McNichols	39.7%
	Love	59.7%
	Other	0.7%

Kiowa	McNichols	40.3%
	Love	59.1%
	Other	0.5%

Kit Carson	McNichols	34.8%
	Love	65.0%
	Other	0.2%

Lake	McNichols	56.4%
	Love	43.3%
	Other	0.4%

La Plata	McNichols	42.3%
	Love	57.4%
	Other	0.3%

Larimer	McNichols	35.3%
	Love	64.5%
	Other	0.3%

Las Animas	McNichols	56.2%
	Love	43.4%
	Other	0.4%

Lincoln	McNichols	35.0%
	Love	64.5%
	Other	0.6%

Logan	McNichols	36.5%
	Love	63.1%
	Other	0.3%

Mesa	McNichols	38.3%
	Love	61.4%
	Other	0.3%

Mineral	McNichols	55.1%
	Love	43.9%
	Other	1.0%

Moffat	McNichols	37.1%
	Love	62.6%
	Other	0.3%

Montezuma	McNichols	42.6%
	Love	56.8%
	Other	0.6%

Montrose	McNichols	36.7%
	Love	62.9%
	Other	0.5%

Morgan	McNichols	38.0%
	Love	61.7%
	Other	0.3%

Otero	McNichols	42.2%
	Love	57.4%
	Other	0.3%

Ouray	McNichols	38.1%
	Love	61.9%

Park	McNichols	32.7%
	Love	67.1%
	Other	0.2%

Phillips	McNichols	38.4%
	Love	61.3%
	Other	0.3%

Pitkin	McNichols	41.9%
	Love	57.7%
	Other	0.4%

Prowers	McNichols	38.9%
	Love	60.6%
	Other	0.5%

Pueblo	McNichols	42.1%
	Love	56.6%
	Other	1.2%

Rio Blanco	McNichols	32.8%
	Love	66.6%
	Other	0.6%

Rio Grande	McNichols	34.5%
	Love	64.9%
	Other	0.6%

Routt	McNichols	49.4%
	Love	50.4%
	Other	0.2%

Saguache	McNichols	42.3%
	Love	56.9%
	Other	0.7%

San Juan	McNichols	42.7%
	Love	57.1%
	Other	0.2%

San Miguel	McNichols	47.1%
	Love	52.4%
	Other	0.4%

Sedgwick	McNichols	39.6%
	Love	60.1%
	Other	0.3%

Summit	McNichols	43.5%
	Love	56.4%
	Other	0.2%

Teller	McNichols	33.5%
	Love	66.3%
	Other	0.2%

Washington	McNichols	32.4%
	Love	67.3%
	Other	0.3%

Weld	McNichols	37.8%
	Love	61.3%
	Other	0.8%

Yuma	McNichols	30.7%
	Love	68.7%
	Other	0.6%

National DataGraph for 1962 - Colorado Results for 1962

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved

Note: The advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.