Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-04-25

Map

Map

Adams	Young	48.1%
	Taft	51.9%

Allen	Young	40.2%
	Taft	59.8%

Ashland	Young	38.5%
	Taft	61.5%

Ashtabula	Young	52.1%
	Taft	47.9%

Athens	Young	52.0%
	Taft	48.0%

Auglaize	Young	41.3%
	Taft	58.7%

Belmont	Young	61.7%
	Taft	38.3%

Brown	Young	54.2%
	Taft	45.8%

Butler	Young	48.6%
	Taft	51.4%

Carroll	Young	43.7%
	Taft	56.3%

Champaign	Young	43.2%
	Taft	56.8%

Clark	Young	53.2%
	Taft	46.8%

Clermont	Young	48.4%
	Taft	51.6%

Clinton	Young	40.4%
	Taft	59.6%

Columbiana	Young	48.4%
	Taft	51.6%

Coshocton	Young	47.1%
	Taft	52.9%

Crawford	Young	45.4%
	Taft	54.6%

Cuyahoga	Young	56.7%
	Taft	43.3%

Darke	Young	44.4%
	Taft	55.6%

Defiance	Young	47.3%
	Taft	52.7%

Delaware	Young	38.6%
	Taft	61.4%

Erie	Young	46.4%
	Taft	53.6%

Fairfield	Young	47.1%
	Taft	52.9%

Fayette	Young	46.0%
	Taft	54.0%

Franklin	Young	44.2%
	Taft	55.8%

Fulton	Young	33.0%
	Taft	67.0%

Gallia	Young	39.2%
	Taft	60.8%

Geauga	Young	42.9%
	Taft	57.1%

Greene	Young	46.4%
	Taft	53.6%

Guernsey	Young	48.2%
	Taft	51.8%

Hamilton	Young	45.7%
	Taft	54.3%

Hancock	Young	34.7%
	Taft	65.3%

Hardin	Young	44.2%
	Taft	55.8%

Harrison	Young	49.2%
	Taft	50.8%

Henry	Young	38.4%
	Taft	61.6%

Highland	Young	44.9%
	Taft	55.1%

Hocking	Young	56.4%
	Taft	43.6%

Holmes	Young	42.5%
	Taft	57.5%

Huron	Young	42.2%
	Taft	57.8%

Jackson	Young	48.4%
	Taft	51.6%

Jefferson	Young	60.5%
	Taft	39.5%

Knox	Young	47.0%
	Taft	53.0%

Lake	Young	48.5%
	Taft	51.5%

Lawrence	Young	50.5%
	Taft	49.5%

Licking	Young	48.8%
	Taft	51.2%

Logan	Young	40.9%
	Taft	59.1%

Lorain	Young	53.1%
	Taft	46.9%

Lucas	Young	59.2%
	Taft	40.8%

Madison	Young	41.2%
	Taft	58.8%

Mahoning	Young	59.8%
	Taft	40.2%

Marion	Young	47.4%
	Taft	52.6%

Medina	Young	41.7%
	Taft	58.3%

Meigs	Young	40.9%
	Taft	59.1%

Mercer	Young	49.9%
	Taft	50.1%

Miami	Young	44.0%
	Taft	56.0%

Monroe	Young	54.8%
	Taft	45.2%

Montgomery	Young	51.0%
	Taft	49.0%

Morgan	Young	42.3%
	Taft	57.7%

Morrow	Young	41.2%
	Taft	58.8%

Muskingum	Young	48.7%
	Taft	51.3%

Noble	Young	43.6%
	Taft	56.4%

Ottawa	Young	52.1%
	Taft	47.9%

Paulding	Young	43.7%
	Taft	56.3%

Perry	Young	54.9%
	Taft	45.1%

Pickaway	Young	47.6%
	Taft	52.4%

Pike	Young	61.7%
	Taft	38.3%

Portage	Young	51.5%
	Taft	48.5%

Preble	Young	44.7%
	Taft	55.3%

Putnam	Young	45.8%
	Taft	54.2%

Richland	Young	47.7%
	Taft	52.3%

Ross	Young	44.4%
	Taft	55.6%

Sandusky	Young	46.4%
	Taft	53.6%

Scioto	Young	53.3%
	Taft	46.7%

Seneca	Young	45.4%
	Taft	54.6%

Shelby	Young	48.8%
	Taft	51.2%

Stark	Young	49.6%
	Taft	50.4%

Summit	Young	51.5%
	Taft	48.5%

Trumbull	Young	54.5%
	Taft	45.5%

Tuscarawas	Young	55.4%
	Taft	44.6%

Union	Young	34.8%
	Taft	65.2%

Van Wert	Young	42.0%
	Taft	58.0%

Vinton	Young	49.0%
	Taft	51.0%

Warren	Young	45.4%
	Taft	54.6%

Washington	Young	42.3%
	Taft	57.7%

Wayne	Young	38.5%
	Taft	61.5%

Williams	Young	38.9%
	Taft	61.1%

Wood	Young	45.1%
	Taft	54.9%

Wyandot	Young	41.8%
	Taft	58.2%

National DataGraph for 1964 - Ohio Results for 1964

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved