Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-07-24

Map

Map

Adams	Lamm	73.1%
	Fuhr	24.5%
	Other	2.4%

Alamosa	Lamm	65.4%
	Fuhr	33.3%
	Other	1.4%

Arapahoe	Lamm	62.8%
	Fuhr	34.4%
	Other	2.7%

Archuleta	Lamm	47.0%
	Fuhr	52.4%
	Other	0.6%

Baca	Lamm	56.2%
	Fuhr	42.6%
	Other	1.2%

Bent	Lamm	62.7%
	Fuhr	35.5%
	Other	1.8%

Boulder	Lamm	71.4%
	Fuhr	25.8%
	Other	2.8%

Chaffee	Lamm	61.3%
	Fuhr	33.5%
	Other	5.2%

Cheyenne	Lamm	54.9%
	Fuhr	44.0%
	Other	1.0%

Clear Creek	Lamm	63.8%
	Fuhr	32.6%
	Other	3.6%

Conejos	Lamm	63.2%
	Fuhr	35.2%
	Other	1.5%

Costilla	Lamm	80.4%
	Fuhr	18.8%
	Other	0.8%

Crowley	Lamm	54.2%
	Fuhr	44.6%
	Other	1.2%

Custer	Lamm	49.8%
	Fuhr	46.8%
	Other	3.5%

Delta	Lamm	56.0%
	Fuhr	42.8%
	Other	1.2%

Denver	Lamm	74.8%
	Fuhr	22.1%
	Other	3.1%

Dolores	Lamm	58.4%
	Fuhr	40.6%
	Other	1.0%

Douglas	Lamm	52.4%
	Fuhr	44.8%
	Other	2.9%

Eagle	Lamm	70.4%
	Fuhr	27.3%
	Other	2.3%

Elbert	Lamm	57.1%
	Fuhr	40.3%
	Other	2.7%

El Paso	Lamm	57.6%
	Fuhr	40.2%
	Other	2.2%

Fremont	Lamm	57.3%
	Fuhr	39.8%
	Other	2.9%

Garfield	Lamm	62.3%
	Fuhr	35.3%
	Other	2.4%

Gilpin	Lamm	64.5%
	Fuhr	29.1%
	Other	6.4%

Grand	Lamm	62.3%
	Fuhr	35.5%
	Other	2.2%

Gunnison	Lamm	59.2%
	Fuhr	38.2%
	Other	2.5%

Hinsdale	Lamm	45.9%
	Fuhr	53.3%
	Other	0.9%

Huerfano	Lamm	68.8%
	Fuhr	29.4%
	Other	1.8%

Jackson	Lamm	55.0%
	Fuhr	44.0%
	Other	1.0%

Jefferson	Lamm	65.8%
	Fuhr	31.4%
	Other	2.8%

Kiowa	Lamm	54.1%
	Fuhr	45.5%
	Other	0.4%

Kit Carson	Lamm	57.3%
	Fuhr	41.7%
	Other	1.0%

Lake	Lamm	64.0%
	Fuhr	28.8%
	Other	7.3%

La Plata	Lamm	50.2%
	Fuhr	48.3%
	Other	1.5%

Larimer	Lamm	65.8%
	Fuhr	30.8%
	Other	3.4%

Las Animas	Lamm	70.7%
	Fuhr	28.2%
	Other	1.2%

Lincoln	Lamm	53.1%
	Fuhr	45.6%
	Other	1.3%

Logan	Lamm	68.3%
	Fuhr	30.4%
	Other	1.3%

Mesa	Lamm	55.4%
	Fuhr	42.7%
	Other	1.9%

Mineral	Lamm	57.1%
	Fuhr	40.7%
	Other	2.2%

Moffat	Lamm	54.3%
	Fuhr	41.6%
	Other	4.1%

Montezuma	Lamm	49.1%
	Fuhr	49.6%
	Other	1.3%

Montrose	Lamm	57.5%
	Fuhr	41.5%
	Other	1.1%

Morgan	Lamm	64.1%
	Fuhr	33.9%
	Other	2.1%

Otero	Lamm	61.5%
	Fuhr	36.3%
	Other	2.2%

Ouray	Lamm	47.4%
	Fuhr	50.8%
	Other	1.8%

Park	Lamm	63.7%
	Fuhr	28.2%
	Other	8.1%

Phillips	Lamm	66.3%
	Fuhr	32.5%
	Other	1.1%

Pitkin	Lamm	74.9%
	Fuhr	19.3%
	Other	5.8%

Prowers	Lamm	62.7%
	Fuhr	34.5%
	Other	2.8%

Pueblo	Lamm	64.4%
	Fuhr	33.3%
	Other	2.3%

Rio Blanco	Lamm	44.3%
	Fuhr	53.3%
	Other	2.4%

Rio Grande	Lamm	56.1%
	Fuhr	42.4%
	Other	1.5%

Routt	Lamm	65.9%
	Fuhr	29.8%
	Other	4.3%

Saguache	Lamm	62.2%
	Fuhr	36.2%
	Other	1.5%

San Juan	Lamm	55.8%
	Fuhr	40.1%
	Other	4.1%

San Miguel	Lamm	64.7%
	Fuhr	33.0%
	Other	2.4%

Sedgwick	Lamm	61.9%
	Fuhr	37.5%
	Other	0.6%

Summit	Lamm	72.1%
	Fuhr	25.5%
	Other	2.4%

Teller	Lamm	61.0%
	Fuhr	35.5%
	Other	3.5%

Washington	Lamm	55.0%
	Fuhr	43.3%
	Other	1.6%

Weld	Lamm	61.7%
	Fuhr	36.0%
	Other	2.4%

Yuma	Lamm	59.1%
	Fuhr	39.4%
	Other	1.5%

National DataGraph for 1982 - Colorado Results for 1982

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved